Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 18;67(3):1625–1640. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c01089

Table 2. OT Analogues with OTR Preference or Selectivity over VPRs.

5.

a

RSR, receptor selectivity ratio: calculated dividing highest receptor selectivity among receptors by OTR affinity.

b

Disulfide bridge formed with substituted dibromoxylene (m-xylene bridged between residues 1 and 6).

c

thio = S–S bridge was substituted for CH2–S, with CH2 in position 6.

d

BuG, N-(n-butyl)glycine.

e

thP = trans-4-hydroxyproline.

f

L(Me) = γ-methylleucine.

g

thio = S–S bridge was substituted for CH2–S, with CH2 in position 1.

h

X′ amino acids used to form a lactam bridge.

i

zG = azaglycine.

j

G(2-ThiMe) = N-alkylated glycines with 2-thiophenylmethyl.

k

MeBzlG = N-(3methylbenzyl)glycine.

l

FBzlG = N-(4-fluorobenzyl)glycine.

m

C8 = octanoic acid.

n

Biphasic fitting (Hill coefficient for both phases was fixed to −1; “EC50 hi” refers to the high-affinity site and “EC50 lo” to the low-affinity site.178 All assay values were obtained from pharmacological testing on human isoforms of OTR, V1aR, V1bR, and V2R. *Analogues are based on OT sequence (indicates C-terminal amide). **Ki values are presented in white, EC50 values in gray. n.d. = not determined; “d” = for desamino (no N-terminal amine); d(CH2)5 = 1-[β-mercapto-β,β-cyclopentamethylene]propionic acid.