Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 12.
Published in final edited form as: Radiology. 2019 Oct 1;293(3):583–591. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190928

Table 3:

Clustering Reproducibility of All Radiomic Features, Reproducible Radiomic Features, and Reproducible Corrected Radiomic Features according to Changes in Technical Parameters

Parameter All Radiomic Features Reproducible Radiomic Features Reproducible and Corrected Radiomic Features P Value for Random Features vs Reproducible Features P Value for Corrected Random Features vs Reproducible Corrected Features

Section thickness (reference value, 3.0 mm)
 1.0 mm 0.14 (0.07, 0.2) 0.43 (0.3, 0.56) 0.59 (0.45, 0.69) <.001 <.001
 5.0 mm 0.14 (0.07, 0.22) 0.36 (0.26, 0.5) 0.71 (0.57, 0.83)  .001 <.001
Dose level (reference value, 100%)
 Dose level 25% 0.18 (0.11, 0.29) 0.32 (0.21, 0.47) 0.55 (0.41, 0.72)  .02 <.001
 Dose level 37% 0.19 (0.11, 0.28) 0.36 (0.26, 0.47) 0.47 (0.32, 0.62)  .006  .001
 Dose level 50% 0.2 (0.11, 0.3) 0.4 (0.26, 0.59) 0.51 (0.38, 0.64)  .01 <.001
 Dose level 62% 0.27 (0.19, 0.39) 0.35 (0.2, 0.49) 0.48 (0.34, 0.66)  .14  .02
 Dose level 75% 0.37 (0.25, 0.49) 0.33 (0.2, 0.49) 0.39 (0.25, 0.55)  .59  .06
 Dose level 87% 0.47 (0.34, 0.6) 0.46 (0.32, 0.59) 0.51 (0.38, 0.66)  .45  .007
Algorithm (reference, FBP)
 SAFIRE strength 1 0.28 (0.22, 0.38) 0.28 (0.18, 0.36) 0.51 (0.42, 0.6)  .46  .154
 SAFIRE strength 2 0.18 (0.1, 0.27) 0.26 (0.14, 0.4) 0.57 (0.43, 0.73)  .13  .009
 SAFIRE strength 3 0.15 (0.09, 0.23) 0.31 (0.2, 0.41) 0.5 (0.39, 0.66)  .02  .02
 SAFIRE strength 4 0.14 (0.07, 0.21) 0.29 (0.18, 0.41) 0.42 (0.32, 0.53)  .02  .01
 SAFIRE strength 5 0.13 (0.07, 0.2) 0.32 (0.21, 0.44) 0.46 (0.34, 0.62)  .003 <.001
Kernel (reference, B30)
 B20f 0.15 (0.09, 0.22) 0.32 (0.24, 0.44) 0.44 (0.34, 0.55)  .01  .023
 B35f 0.19 (0.12, 0.24) 0.4 (0.26, 0.53) 0.59 (0.47, 0.7)  .004  .001
 B40f 0.27 (0.16, 0.36) 0.55 (0.4, 0.72) 0.67 (0.53, 0.78)  .006  .001
 B41f 0.32 (0.23, 0.43) 0.58 (0.47, 0.7) 0.58 (0.47, 0.74)  .004  .003
 D30f 0.3 (0.2, 0.41) 0.54 (0.42, 0.68) 0.55 (0.45, 0.69)  .001  .004
 Br36f 0.17 (0.1, 0.25) 0.36 (0.26, 0.47) 0.59 (0.48, 0.7)  .008 <.001
 Br40f 0.26 (0.16, 0.38) 0.54 (0.37, 0.72) 0.68 (0.54, 0.81)  .01 <.001
 Bf39f 0.33 (0.23, 0.43) 0.58 (0.47, 0.7) 0.57 (0.47, 0.74)  .002  .005
 Bf42f 0.19 (0.11, 0.28) 0.44 (0.3, 0.6) 0.60 (0.48, 0.75)  .006 <.001
 Qr36f 0.17 (0.09, 0.26) 0.36 (0.24, 0.47) 0.59 (0.47, 0.69)  .006 <.001
 Qr40f 0.31 (0.22, 0.42) 0.64 (0.49, 0.8) 0.67 (0.5, 0.82) <.001 <.001

Note.—Data are nonparametric correlation values (ρ values [range, 0–1, with 1 representing perfect agreement]) between two hierarchical clusters based on radiomic features for which half of patients were scanned by using the reference CT technique and half were scanned by using an alternative technique. FBP = filtered back projection, SAFIRE = sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction. Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals; P < .05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.