Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 10;40(9):624–635. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001833

Table 3.

Quality of evidence assessment for each outcome

Quality assessment Summary of findings
Outcome Limitations Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication bias Total number of participants Conclusion Quality of evidence (GRADE)
Rest pain score at 2 postoperative hours (analogue scale, 0–10) No major limitationsa Serious inconsistencyb No serious indirectnessc No serious imprecisiond No publication bias 1115 No difference between groups Moderate quality (⊕⊕⊕O)e
Rest pain score at 24 postoperative hours (analogue scale, 0–10) No major limitationsa Serious inconsistencyb No serious indirectnessc No serious imprecisiond No publication bias 1636 Reduced rest pain score in liposomal bupivacaine group Moderate quality (⊕⊕⊕O)e
Rest pain score at 48 postoperative hours (analogue scale, 0–10) No major limitationsa Serious inconsistencyb No serious indirectnessc No serious imprecisiond No publication bias 1759 Reduced rest pain score in liposomal bupivacaine group Moderate quality (⊕⊕⊕O)e
Rest pain score at 72 postoperative hours (analogue scale, 0–10) No major limitationsa Serious inconsistencyb No serious indirectnessc No serious imprecisiond No publication bias 1570 Reduced rest pain score in liposomal bupivacaine group Moderate quality (⊕⊕⊕O)e
Interval iv morphine equivalent consumption at 0–24 postoperative hours No major limitationsa Serious inconsistencyb No serious indirectnessc No serious imprecisiond No publication bias 1414 No difference between groups Moderate quality (⊕⊕⊕O)e
Interval iv morphine equivalent consumption at 24–48 postoperative hours No major limitationsa Serious inconsistencyb No serious indirectnessc No serious imprecisiond No publication bias 1153 No difference between groups Moderate quality (⊕⊕⊕O)e
Interval iv morphine equivalent consumption at 48–72 postoperative hours No major limitationsa Serious inconsistencyb No serious indirectnessc No serious imprecisiond No publication bias 1067 No difference between groups Moderate quality (⊕⊕⊕O)e
Presence of nausea or vomiting at 24 postoperative hours No major limitationsa No serious inconsistency No serious indirectnessc No serious imprecisiond No publication bias 141 No difference between groups Moderate quality (⊕⊕⊕O)f
Presence of nausea or vomiting at 48 postoperative hours No major limitationsa No serious inconsistency No serious indirectnessc No serious imprecisiond No publication bias 141 No difference between groups Moderate quality (⊕⊕⊕O)f
Presence of nausea or vomiting at 72 postoperative hours No major limitationsa No serious inconsistency No serious indirectnessc No serious imprecisiond No publication bias 314 Presence of nausea or vomiting reduced in liposomal bupivacaine group Moderate quality (⊕⊕⊕O)f
Hospital length of stay (hours) No major limitationsa Serious inconsistencyb No serious indirectnessc No serious imprecisiond No publication bias 1381 No difference between groups Moderate quality (⊕⊕⊕O)e
a

As only a limited number of studies suffered from a high-risk of bias, we estimated there is no major limitation.

b

I2 above 50%.

c

Consistent definition of the reported outcome.

d

No serious imprecision as the clinical decision would not be modified whether the upper of lower boundary limit of the confidence interval represented the truth.

e

We rated down the quality of evidence for serious inconsistency.

f

We rated down for limitations, as six trials or less reported this outcome.