Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 8;20:59–73. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S434556

Table 1.

Demographics and Disease Characteristics of Patients with (a) ND and (b) R/R AML in the NICHE-AML Registry

(a)
Characteristic All ND AML Patients N = 853 FLT3WT N = 432 FLT3MUT N = 109 Unknown FLT3 Mutation Statusa N = 312
Follow-up duration, days 573.4 (475.9) 494.8 (364.2) 399.8 (328.1) 742.9 (592.6)
Age at diagnosis, y 42.5 (12.8) 43.1 (12.8) 44.0 (12.5) 41.3 (12.8)
Male, n (%) 448 (52.5) 244 (56.5) 51 (46.8) 153 (49.0)
Known mutation status at diagnosis, n (%) 541 (63.4) 432 (100) 109 (100) -
FLT3 109 (20.1) 0 109 (100) -
NPM1 109 (20.1) 66 (15.3) 43 (39.4) -
CEBPA 103 (19.0) 89 (20.6) 14 (12.8) -
IDH1 38 (7.0) 32 (7.4) 6 (5.5) -
 Other acquired mutation 533 (98.5) 428 (99.1) 105 (96.3) -
Cytogenetic status, n (%) 832 (97.5) 421 (97.5) 105 (96.3) 306 (98.1)
 Abnormal karyotype 416 (50.0) 235 (55.8) 42 (40.0) 139 (45.4)
FAB classification,23 n (%) 650 (76.2) 345 (79.9) 77 (70.6) 228 (73.1)
 M0 3 (0.5) 2 (0.6) 0 1 (0.4)
 M1 6 (0.9) 2 (0.6) 1 (1.3) 3 (1.3)
 M2 253 (38.9) 158 (45.8) 20 (26.0) 75 (32.9)
 M4 113 (17.4) 54 (15.7) 12 (15.6) 47 (20.6)
 M5 265 (40.8) 126 (36.5) 44 (57.1) 95 (41.7)
 M6 6 (0.9) 1 (0.3) 0 5 (2.2)
 M7 1 (0.2) 0 0 1 (0.4)
Type of AML
 De novo 849 (99.5) 428 (99.1) 109 (100) 312 (100)
 Secondary 4 (0.5) 4 (0.9) 0 0
Risk stratification7 746 (87.5) 427 (98.8) 108 (99.1) 211 (67.6)
 Favorable 283 (37.9) 200 (46.8) 82 (75.9) 1 (0.5)
 Intermediate 423 (56.7) 227 (53.2) 26 (24.1) 170 (80.6)
 Adverse 40 (5.4) 0 0 40 (19.0)
(b)
Characteristic All R/R AML Patients N = 289 FLT3WT N = 58 FLT3MUT N = 14 Unknown FLT3 Mutation Statusb N = 217
Follow-up duration, days 562.7 (438.3) 606.2 (371.7) 479.2 (261.3) 556.4 (463.2)
Age at diagnosis, y 43.6 (13.5) 43.5 (13.1) 44.4 (15.4) 43.6 (13.6)
Male, n (%) 154 (53.3) 32 (55.2) 9 (64.3) 113 (52.1)
Known mutation status at diagnosis, n (%) 183 (63.3) 45 (77.6) 9 (64.3) 129 (59.4)
FLT3 29 (15.8) 3 (6.7) 4 (44.4) 22 (17.1)
NPM1 30 (16.4) 8 (17.8) 3 (33.3) 19 (14.7)
CEBPA 45 (24.6) 20 (44.4) 1 (11.1) 24 (18.6)
IDH1 15 (8.2) 2 (4.4) 2 (22.2) 11 (8.5)
 Other acquired mutation 182 (99.5) 44 (97.8) 9 (100) 129 (100)
Cytogenetic status, n (%) 285 (98.6) 56 (96.6) 14 (100) 215 (99.1)
 Abnormal karyotype 135 (47.4) 21 (37.5) 2 (14.3) 112 (52.1)
FAB classification,23 n (%) 229 (79.2) 56 (96.6) 11 (78.6) 162 (74.7)
 M0 0 0 0 0
 M1 2 (0.9) 2 (3.6) 0 0
 M2 87 (38.0) 30 (53.6) 1 (9.1) 56 (34.6)
 M4 34 (14.8) 5 (8.9) 2 (18.2) 27 (16.7)
 M5 103 (45.0) 19 (33.9) 7 (63.6) 77 (47.5)
 M6 2 (0.9) 0 1 (9.1) 1 (0.6)
 M7 0 0 0 0
Type of AML
 De novo 287 (99.3) 58 (100) 14 (100) 215 (99.1)
 Secondary 2 (0.7) 0 0 2 (0.9)
Risk stratification7c 254 (87.9) 55 (94.8) 14 (100) 185 (85.3)
 Favorable 88 (34.6) 31 (56.4) 5 (35.7) 52 (28.1)
 Intermediate 152 (59.8) 23 (41.8) 9 (64.3) 120 (64.9)
 Adverse 14 (5.5) 1 (1.8) 0 13 (7.0)

Notes: Data are mean (SD), unless otherwise stated. aGenetic testing results were not available for patients with unknown FLT3 mutation status at initial AML diagnosis; bGenetic testing results at initial diagnosis were summarized among patients with relevant information at initial diagnosis; cEach patient was classified into only one risk category.

Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CEBPA, CCAAT enhancer binding protein alpha; FAB, French-American-British; FLT3, FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3; IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; MUT, mutated; ND, newly diagnosed; NPM1, nucleophosmin 1; R/R, relapsed or refractory; SD standard deviation, WT, wild-type, y, years.