Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 27;42(3):301–318. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01336-w

Table 4.

Costs by ambulatory-based setting and disease type

Studies
n (%)
Direct healthcare cost
n (%)
Direct non-healthcare cost
n (%)
Direct healthcare cost
Patient
n (%)
Productivity loss Patient
n (%)
Productivity loss Family/caregiver
n (%)
Setting
Mainly outpatient/ambulatory 4 (9.32) 4 (9.32) 3 (6.99) 1 (2.33) 1 (2.33)
Mainly inpatient with some home-based care 6 (13.98) 6 (13.98) 2 (4.66) 3 (6.99) 1 (2.33) 3 (6.99)
Mainly home-based care 13 (30.29) 12 (27.96) 5 (11.65) 4 (9.32) 4 (9.32)
Multiple care settingsa 20 (46.60) 20 (46,60) 3 (6.99) 4 (9.32) 1 (2.33) 2 (4.66)
Total 43 (100) 42 (97.86) 13 (30.29) 12 (27.96) 3 (6.99) 9 (20.97)
Disease type
 Only cancerb 25 (58.25) 24 (55.92) 5 (11.65) 8 (18.64) 3 (6.99) 5 (11.65)
 Cancer and other terminal conditionsc 18 (41.94) 18 (41.94) 8 (18.64) 4 (9.32) 4 (9.32)
 CHF 12 (27.91) 12 (27.96) 2 (4.66)
 COPD 12 (27.91) 12 (27.96) 2 (4.66)

 Dementia

 AD

7 (16.28) 7 (16.31)
Totalb,c 43 (100) 42 (97.86) 13 (30.29) 12 (27.96) 3 (6.99) 9 (20.97)

All n and percentages are over N = 43 (100%)

AD Alzheimer’s disease, CHF chronic heart failure, COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, PC palliative care

aMultiple settings mean patients cared for in some or all listed settings, including hospice

bData reported in studies that collected data only from patients with cancer as the condition that motivated the PC

cThese studies include data from patients with cancer AND with other terminal conditions requiring PC. CHF, COPD and dementia/AD were the most prevalent. These studies mix patients’ data and each could include, in the same consolidation, data from different patients’ PC cost to calculate the average cost of attention (i.e., PC due to cancer, CHF, COPD and dementia). That is the reason the total sum of all non-cancer patients’ studies included (12+12+7) is not 18 and the total percentage is not 100%