Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 31;12(2):78–89. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1473

Table 2.

Patient characteristics of the study groups

Variable Adult group (n = 33 eyes) Pediatric group (n = 14 eyes) P -value
Age (y), Mean ± SD
Median (Range)
29.97 ± 5.84
31 (20 to 41)
16.36 ± 0.93
17 (14 to 17)
 < 0.001
Sex (Male / Female), n (%) 18 (54.5) / 15 (45.5) 7 (50.0) / 7 (50.0%) 0.78
Preoperative A-K KCN grading
Grade 1 (24 eyes) / Grade 2 (23 eyes), n (%)
18 (54.5) / 15 (45.5) 6 (42.9) / 8 (57.1) 0.46

Abbreviations: n, numbers; y, years; SD, standard deviation; KCN, keratoconus; µm, micrometers. Note: Adult group included patients aged ≥ 18 years with intolerance to spectacles and gas permeable contact lenses (GPCL), stable KCN for at least one year (Kmax remained < 1 diopter [D]), grade 1 and 2 Amsler – Krumeich classification (A-K; Kaverage ≤ 48 D with < - 5 D myopia and astigmatism, 48 – 53 D with 5 – 8 D myopia and astigmatism, respectively) [13]. The cone asymmetry was type 1 and type 2 (100% and 80% of the cones were on one side of the steepest meridian, respectively), and the thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) should be > 380 μm; Pediatric group included patients aged 14 – 17 years with intolerance to spectacles and GPCL, grade 1 and 2 A-K classification [13], type 1 and 2 cone asymmetry, TCT > 380 μm, and the spherical equivalent of the refractive error worse than - 4 D.