Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 9;10(1):e003579. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003579

Table 1.

Patient characteristics of the included studies

Study Patients (n) GPA n (%) MPA n (%) EGPA n (%) PR3+ n (%) MPO+ n (%) Age (years*) Sex (male/female) (n)
Watanabe et al11 271 34 (12.5) 183 (67.5) 15 (5.5) 0 271 (100) 73 (65–78) 106/165
Bunch et al12 54 18 (33.3)† 18 (33.3)† 0 23 (42.6) 20 (37.0) Active: 58 (48–68)
Remission: 58 (38–66)
30/24
Matsumoto et al13 29 13 (44.8) 16 (55.2) 0 7 (24.1) 21 (72.4) 70 (57–79) 13/16
Chen et al14 82 14 (17.1) 68 (82.9) 0 0 82 (100) 60±13 41/41
Gou et al15 100‡ NR NR NR 0 100 (100) Active: 55±36
Remission: 59±15
Active: 29/37
Remission: 21/33
Grayson et al16 112 87 (77.7) 25 (22.3) 0 78 (69.6) 34 (30.4) Non-responder: 51±15 Responder: 52±18 53/59
Yanaoka et al17 26 23 (88.5) 3 (11.5) 0 8 (30.8) 18 (69.2) 68 (58–75) 7/19
Monach et al18 186 139 (74.7) 46 (24.7) 0 124 (66.7) 62 (33.3) 52 (44–66) 91/95
Monach et al19 74 57 (77.0) 16 (21.6) 0 54 (73.0) 20 (27.0) 51 (40–63) 33/41
Ahn et al20 60 17 (28.3) 32 (53.3) 11 (18.3) 7 (11.7)§ 37 (61.7)§ 59±14 20/40
Yoon et al21 59 18 (30.5) 30 (50.8) 11 (18.6) 7 (11.9) 35 (59.3) 60±14 21/38
Sun et al22 32 NR NR NR 2 (6.3) 30 (93.8) 59±12 13/19
Kambas et al23 17 11 (64.7) 6 (35.3) 0 9 (52.9) 8 (47.1) 58±12 5/12
Aendekerk et al24 95 55 (57.9) 37 (38.9) 3 (3.2) 45 (47.4)§ 47 (49.5)§ NR 62/33
O’Reilly et al, inception25 177¶ 101 (57.1) 54 (30.5) 12 (6.8) NR NR 64 (range 21–90) 87/90
O’Reilly et al, validation 125 155¶ 94 (60.6) 49 (31.6) 6 (3.9) NR NR 60 (range 17–95) 97/58
O’Reilly et al, validation 225 133** 57 (42.9) 59 (44.4) 8 (6.0) NR NR 60 (range 18–91) 80/53
O’Reilly et al, Ext. validation25 39 28 (71.8) 11 (28.2) 0 NR NR 59 (range 31–82) 16/23
Dekkema et al26 154 NR NR NR 93 (60.4) 61 (39.6) Inception: 58 (47–67)
Validation: 61 (48–74)
87/67
Wu et al27 256††
 Active 173 NR NR NR 11 (6.4) 162 (93.6) 59±14 66/107
 Remission 143 NR NR NR 4 (2.8) 53 (37.1) 60±12 61/82
Gou et al28 29 NR NR NR 0 29 (100) 58±15 12/17
Sonnemann et al29 87 53 (60.9) 34 (39.1) 0 48 (55.2) 39 (44.8) 57 (48–64)‡‡
44 (38–51)§§
63 (55–71)¶¶
67 (56–73)***
50 (44–58)†††
64 (52–68)‡‡‡
54/33
Sparding et al30 47 NR NR NR 21 (44.7) 23 (48.9) 62 (55–69) 28/19
Matsuda et al31 49 0 49 (100) 0 3 (6.1)§§§ 48 (98.0)§§§ ILD: 71 (68–77)
No ILD: 76 (71–82)
25/24
Wu et al32 39 NR NR NR 0 39 (100) 58±100¶¶¶
63±14****
57±14††††
22/17

*Median (IQR) or mean±SD.

†Seven renal limited patients.

‡Twenty patients had both active and remission samples.

§One patient MPO-ANCA and PR3-ANCA positive.

¶Three anti-GBM disease patients were included.

**Five anti-GBM disease patients were included.

††Sixty patients had samples at both active disease stage and remission.

‡‡Active renal disease, inception cohort.

§§Active non-renal disease, inception cohort.

¶¶Remission, inception cohort.

***Active renal disease, validation cohort.

†††Active non-renal disease, validation cohort.

‡‡‡Remission, validation cohort.

§§§Two patients MPO-ANCA and PR3-ANCA positive.

¶¶¶Group of patients without kidney dysfunction .

****Group of patients who did not need dialysis.

††††Group of patients requiring dialysis.

ANCA, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody ; EGPA, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis; Ext., external; GPA, granulomatosis with polyangiitis; ILD, interstitial lung disease; MPA, microscopic polyangiitis; MPO, myeloperoxidase; n, number; NR, not reported; PR3, roteinase 3.