Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2024 Jan 31:2024.01.30.24302026. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2024.01.30.24302026

Table 2:

Minimally adjusted and fully adjusted estimates of intervention effects for pre-specified study outcomes.

Arm Proportion Risk Ratio (95% CI) Risk Difference (95% CI)
Minimally Adjusted Fully Adjusted Minimally Adjusted Fully Adjusted
Primary – ACTs sold to malaria test-positive clients
Control 49/558 (8.8%)
Intervention 49/626 (7.8%) 0.85 (0.34, 2.16) 0.79 (0.27, 2.33) −0.01 (−0.09, 0.07) −0.02 (−0.10, 0.07)
Secondary 1 -- Suspected malaria cases that receive a mRDT (testing uptake)
Control 226/928 (24%)
Intervention 217/958 (23%) 0.92 (0.47, 1.78) 0.95 (0.50, 1.81) −0.01 (−0.20, 0.18) 0.01 (−0.18, 0.20)
Secondary 2 – Malaria tested clients whose treatment adhered to test results
Control 167/226 (74%)
Intervention 118/217 (54%) 0.76 (0.36, 1.62) 0.77 (0.36, 1.64) −0.17 (−0.36, 0.01) −0.17 (−0.37, 0.03)
Secondary 3 – Suspected malaria cases that are managed appropriately
Control 167/928 (18%)
Intervention 118/958 (12%) 0.67 (0.33, 1.33) 0.66 (0.33, 1.31) −0.05 (−0.19, 0.10) −0.06 (−0.24, 0.11)
Secondary 4 – Untested clients taking ACT
Control 462/836 (55%)
Intervention 498/827 (60%) 1.09 (0.62, 1.90) 1.02 (0.60, 1.74) 0.05 (−0.03, 0.12) 0.01 (−0.08, 0.09)