Table 2.
Patients | Cytokeratin % | EpCam % | Oct4a % | TET2% | 5hmC % | CSC Support | Treatment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | .85 | .085 | .09 | Not Done | Not Done | Yes | Yes |
2 | 5.92 | .03 | .02 | .2 | 4.81 | No | No |
3 | .24 | .04 | .04 | 0 | .23 | Possible | Yes |
4 | .79 | .62 | .76 | 0 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
5 | 9 | .51 | .67 | .39 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
6 | 15.1 | .39 | 6.3 | .1 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
7 | .46 | .01 | .26 | 0 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
8 | .89 | .79 | .27 | 0 | .85 | No | Yes |
Cytokeratin + cells were analyzed by gating the nucleated fraction in peripheral blood. The identified cytokeratin+ cells were further analyzed for the shown markers. CSC support was determined by analyses of the combined phenotype - EpCam and Oct4a as potential stemness, and further sustenance of CSCs with decreases in TET2 and/or 5hmC, which prevent demethylation