Table 4. Performance of the Nucleic Transformer across Human and Mouse Species Compared to Previous Results.
organism | model | accuracy | precision | recall | F1 | MCC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
human TATA | DeePromoter | 0.9732 | 0.943 | 0.9785 | 0.9604 | 0.94 |
Nucleic Transformer | 0.9775 | 0.9621 | 0.9706 | 0.9663 | 0.9494 | |
human non-TATA | DeePromoter | 0.8373 | 0.8575 | 0.9592 | 0.9055 | 0.363 |
Nucleic Transformer | 0.8829 | 0.9064 | 0.9544 | 0.9298 | 0.585 | |
mouse TATA | DeePromoter | 0.9751 | 0.9513 | 0.9779 | 0.9644 | 0.9456 |
Nucleic Transformer | 0.9776 | 0.958 | 0.9779 | 0.9678 | 0.9508 | |
mouse non-TATA | DeePromoter | 0.8342 | 0.8518 | 0.954 | 0.9 | 0.4497 |
Nucleic Transformer | 0.9015 | 0.9271 | 0.9487 | 0.9378 | 0.7037 |