Table 1 -.

Statistical analyses of data in Fig. 2: CFA-induced latent sensitization

group	Fig. 2 panel	n	data analyzed	time	side	time x side
control	A	8	CFA in the paw, days −4 to 35	p = 0.0006 F(5, 35) = 5.7	p = 0.0386 F(1, 16) = 45	p < 0.0001 F(5, 35) = 11
	B	8	day 28: vehicle i.th. then NTX i.th.	p < 0.0001 F(4, 28) = 10.3	p = 0.203 F(1, 7) = 1.97	p = 0.305 F(4, 28) = 1.27
	C	8	day 35: NTX i.th.	p < 0.0001 F(4, 28) = 18	p = 0.051 F(1, 7) = 5.5	p = 0.273 F(4, 28) = 1.36
RP67580	D	8	CFA in the paw, days −4 to 35	p = 0.0003 F(5, 35) = 6.33	p = 0.0027 F(1, 7) = 20	p < 0.0001 F(5, 35) = 8.9
	E	8	day 28: RP67580 i.th. then NTX i.th.	p = 0.330 F(4, 28) = 1.20	p = 0.015 F(1, 7) = 10.3	p = 0.56 F(4, 28) = 0.75
	F	8	day 35: NTX i.th.	p = 0.0044 F(4, 28) = 4.8	p = 0.0089 F(1, 7) = 12.9	p = 0.0175 F(4, 28) = 3.59

Data in the panels of Fig. 2 were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA, repeated-measures by both variables: time of von Frey measures and side (ipsilateral vs. contralateral). n is the sample size.