Table 2 -.

Statistical analyses of data in Fig. 3: SNI-induced latent sensitization

group	Fig. 3 panel	n	data analyzed	time	side	time x side
control	A	8	SNI, days −4 to 35	p = 0.0026 F(5, 35) = 4.58	p = 0.0017 F(1, 7) = 24	p < 0.0001 F(5, 29) = 8.3
	B	8	day 28: vehicle i.th. then NTX i.th.	p < 0.0001 F(4, 28) = 16	p = 0.0085 F(1, 7) = 13	p = 0.0042 F(4, 28) = 4.8
	C	5	day 35: NTX i.th.	p = 0.0039 F(4, 16) = 6.0	p = 0.063 F(1, 4) = 27	p = 0.403 F(4, 16) = 1.07
RP67580	D	7	SNI, days −4 to 35	p = 0.0058 F(5, 30) = 4.12	p = 0.0006 F(1, 6) = 42	p < 0.0001 F(5, 30) = 9.4
	E	7	day 28: RP67580 i.th. then NTX i.th.	p = 0.0018 F(4, 24) = 5.9	p = 0.0084 F(1, 6) = 14.9	p = 0.98 F(4, 24) = 0.08
	F	7	day 35: NTX i.th.	p = 0.49 F(4, 24) = 0.88	p = 0.14 F(1, 6) = 2.88	p = 0.52 F(4, 24) =0.82

Data in the panels of Fig. 3 were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, repeated-measures by both variables: time of von Frey measures and side (ipsilateral vs. contralateral). Panel A was analyzed using mixed-effects analysis because a few baseline data were missing. n is the sample size. In row C, 3 of the 8 rats were excluded because they lost the i.th. catheter.