Table 1.
Detailed descriptions and key references corresponding to each of the 12 paths in the conceptual framework shown in Fig. 1
Path | Description | Relationships | Key references |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Plants with larger genome sizes are less likely to succeed in invasion. | ↘ | 14,25 |
2 | Plants with larger genome sizes tend to have narrow native range sizes. | ↘ | 18 |
3 | Various relationships between plant genome size and a diversity of functional traits relevant to invasion success have been reported. | → | 15,25 |
4 | Relationships between plant genome size and adaptative strategies (i.e., Grime’s CSR framework, Grime and Pierce 2012) remain unknown. | ||
5 | Relationships between plant genome size and their economic use remain unknown. | ||
6 | Various relationships between plant species’ traits and their native range size are reported. | → | 29,55 |
7 | Plants with certain traits are more frequently used by humans. | → | 11,34 |
8 | Plants with wider native ranges are more frequently used by humans. | ↗ | 34,43 |
9 | Plants with wider native ranges are more likely to succeed in invasion. | ↗ | 34,40 |
10 | Various trait-invasion relationships are reported. | → | 27,28,34,35 |
11 | Plants which have economic uses are more likely to become naturalized and invasive. | ↗ | 11 |
12 | Grime’s CSR strategies represent plants’ overall adaptation to environmental conditions. | 31,37 |
Up-right arrows, down-right arrows, and horizontal arrows, respectively, represent positive, negative and variable relationships.