Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 26;10(3):e25139. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25139

Table 1.

Ultimate and proximate analysis of pellet samples.

Sample Carbon [%] Ash – carbon [%] Hydrogen [%] Nitrogen [%] Sulphur [%] Moisture [%] Volatile matter dry [%] Fixed carbon dry [%] Ash dry [%] LCV [MJ/kg]
Spruce 100 47.34
±0.59
25.84
±1.36
6.30
±0.09
0.00
±0.00
0.04
±0.04
5.66
±0.12
82.02
±0.09
17.43
±0.12
0.55
±0.02
17.59
±0.08
Spruce 95 49.77
±0.27
16.94
±2.29
6.14
±0.04
0.03
±0.04
4.63
±0.05
82.14
±0.08
17.14
±0.09
0.73
±0.02
18.97
±0.17
Spruce 90 51.37
±0.24
10.16
±0.12
6.68
±0.04
0.03
±0.04
4.10
±0.04
83.28
±0.22
15.83
±0.17
0.89
±0.05
19.95
±0.14
Beech 100 45.90
±0.25
7.07
±0.25
6.93
±0.02
0.05
±0.00
5.25
±0.05
81.77
±0.14
16.64
±0.14
1.60
±0.01
16.86
±0.18
Beech 95 48.87
±0.04
6.57
±0.18
6.64
±0.03
0.01
±0.01
4.78
±0.05
83.19
±0.13
15.81
±0.12
1.00
±0.01
18.15
±0.06
Beech 90 50.97
±0.28
7.69
±0.08
7.04
±0.07
0.05
±0.01
4.60
±0.02
84.06
±0.10
14.84
±0.12
1.10
±0.02
19.78
±0.09

More detailed analysis of the energy assessment of COVID-19 medical waste as a potential fuel was realized in previous research [20]. All pellet samples were combusted in a small heat source USPOR 18 AUTOMAT with a retort burner.