Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 23;64(3):590–596. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01777

Table 1. Training and Testing Scores for QSAR Models Tested on Different Parameters of Interesta.

  Data set MSE
Model AutoDock Vina train AutoDock Vina test CNS MPO train CNS MPO test Aggregation train Aggregation test
LR 0.699 0.878 0.366 0.416 0.0002 O(1011)
DT 0.009 0.359 0 0.487 0.0002 0.122
RF 0.047 0.178 0.28 0.232 0.052 0.516
DNN 0.304 0.415 0.056 0.123 0.017 0.081
a

Average mean square error (MSE) from cross validation for four different models for the AutoDock Vina scores and CNS MPO scores (training and testing on the Cayman dataset of ∼10,000 compounds) and half-times of aggregation (training and testing on the aggregation dataset of ∼300 compounds1821). LR = linear regressor, DT = decision tree, RF = random forest, and DNN = deep neural network.