Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 14;24:85. doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04343-2

Table 4.

Effect of the ethanolic bark extract (EBE) and its successive fractions (1 & 2%) of Thespesia populnea (L.) on wound area contraction in circular excision wound model (n = 10)

Groups Dose (%) Wound contraction (%)
Day 2 Day 5 Day 7 Day 11 Day 14
G(1) Normal Control
G(2) Positive control (untreated) 7.31C 14.8 g 48.6C 62.1 C 71.92d
G(3) Vehicle hydrogel base 9.13 b 27.54 d 36.60d 69.24 b 74.8C
G(4) EBE 1 8.56 bC 21.60 f 54.20c 82.98a 90.10a
G(5) Pet-B 1 7.22 c 30.13 d 57.96 c 83.73 a 94.55 b
G(6) Met-B 1 9.11b 31.48 d 53.80 c 81.58 b 87.18 b
G(7) Etac-B 1 8.54 bc 24.70 de 60.40 b 82.14 b 91.43 a
G(8) But-B 1 9.76b 16.10 g 37.71 d 53.97 d 72.94 d
G(9) EBE 2 15.40a 25.94 de 65.60a 85.90a 93.30b
G(10) Pet-B 2 9.58 b 35.42c 62.05 ab 83.70a 95.10 b
G(11) Met-B 2 9.65 b 39.30 b 61.5 b 79.23a 87.45a
G(12) Etac-B 2 9.78 b 44.30a 63.77ab 84.87 a 93.10b
G(13) But-B 2 10.95 b 24.73e 39.7 d 54.84 d 73.24C

Values are expressed as mean, values with different superscript letters (a-g) in the same column at the same interval differ significantly (P < 0.05), Normal control: healthy group, Positive control: untreated group, Vehicle: hydrogel base

Pet-B petroleum ether, Met-B methylene chloride, Etac-B ethyl acetate, But-B butanol fractions