Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 13;35(3):451–468. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06955-9

Table 4.

Additional considerations regarding the fracture risk communication by study site

All (n = 332) Canada, Hamilton (n = 31) Canada, COPN (n = 30) USA, California (n = 35) USA, Washington (n = 29) Mexico (n = 36) Argentina (n = 30) The NL (n = 19) Belgium (n = 30) UK (n = 29) Spain (n = 28) Japan (n = 35) p-value2
Add consequences of fractures
Risk of dying
  Yes 183 (55.1) 17 (54.8) 25 (83.3) 25 (71.4) 18 (62.1) 20 (55.6) 5 (16.7) 6 (31.6) 16 (53.3) 14 (48.3) 27 (96.4) 10 (28.6)  < 0.001
Unable to walk
  Yes 260 (78.3) 24 (77.4) 27 (90.0) 27 (77.1) 23 (79.3) 33 (91.7) 8 (26.7) 11 (57.9) 29 (96.7) 19 (65.5) 28 (100.0) 31 (88.6)  < 0.001
Losing independence
  Yes 262 (78.9) 25 (80.6) 27 (90.0) 27 (77.1) 23 (79.3) 31 (86.1) 12 (40.0) 11 (57.9) 29 (96.7) 21 (72.4) 28 (100.0) 28 (80.0)  < 0.001
Losing QoL
  Yes 253 (76.2) 27 (87.1) 27 (90.0) 27 (77.1) 25 (86.2) 32 (88.9) 5 (16.7) 16 (84.2) 28 (93.3) 22 (75.9) 28 (100.0) 16 (45.7)  < 0.001
Being kyphotic
  Yes 238 (71.7) 23 (74.2) 27 (90.0) 26 (74.3) 21 (72.4) 31 (86.1) 3 (10.0) 12(63.2) 28 (93.3) 19 (65.5) 27 (96.4) 21 (60.0)  < 0.001
Ranking of consequences
Ranked as the most important
  Risk of dying 72 (21.7) 6 (19.4) 10 (33.3) 16 (45.7) 7 (24.1) 7 (19.4) 6 (20.0) 1 (5.3) 5 (16.7) 4 (13.8) 7 (25.0) 4 (11.4) 0.003
  Unable to walk 71 (21.4) 6 (19.4) 2 (6.7) 3 (8.6) 4 (13.8) 9 (25.0) 5 (16.7) 6 (31.6) 9 (30.0) 5 (17.2) 1 (3.6) 21 (60.0)  < 0.001
  Losing independence 75 (22.6) 7 (22.6) 11 (36.7) 2 (5.7) 6 (20.7) 6 (16.7) 5 (16.7) 2 (10.5) 12 (40.0) 4 (13.8) 13 (46.4) 7 (20.0) 0.005
  Losing QoL 80 (24.1) 9 (29.0) 7 (23.3) 9 (25.7) 8 (27.6) 13 (36.1) 4 (13.3) 9 (47.4) 3 (10.0) 12 (41.4) 5 (17.9) 1 (2.9) 0.001
  Being kyphotic 26 (7.8) 3 (9.7) 2 (6.7) 1 (2.9) 2 (6.9) 1 (2.8) 10 (33.3) 2 (10.5) 1 (3.3) 1 (3.4) 2 (7.1) 3 (8.6)  < 0.001
Relevance of pictures
  Yes 230 (69.3) 21 (67.7) 20 (66.7) 17 (48.6) 21 (72.4) 31 (86.1) 25 (83.3) 12 (63.2) 18 (60.0) 12 (41.4) 21 (75.0) 32 (91.4)  < 0.001
  No 70 (21.1) 8 (25.8) 7 (23.3) 16 (45.7) 6 (20.7) 4 (11.1) 1 (3.3) 1 (5.3) 6 (20.0) 16 (55.2) 3 (10.7) 2 (5.7)
  Do not have opinion 32 (9.6) 2 (6.5) 3 (10.0) 2 (5.7) 2 (6.9) 1 (2.8) 4 (13.3) 6 (31.6) 6 (20.0) 1 (3.4) 4 (14.3) 1 (2.9)
Verbal explanation from caregivers (1–7)1 6.55 ± 1.13 5.97 ± 1.64 6.97 ± 0.18 6.77 ± 0.55 6.48 ± 1.15 5.92 ± 2.25 6.80 ± 0.61 6.63 ± 0.76 6.43 ± 0.73 6.86 ± 0.44 7.00 ± 0.00 6.43 ± 0.95  < 0.001
Information printed (1–7)1 6.27 ± 1.41 6.39 ± 0.99 6.97 ± 0.18 6.31 ± 1.37 6.48 ± 0.95 5.92 ± 2.26 6.40 ± 1.13 6.21 ± 1.51 5.67 ± 1.71 6.66 ± 0.55 6.11 ± 1.73 5.91 ± 1.44 0.02
Development of an online website (1–7)1 5.55 ± 1.82 5.42 ± 1.94 6.27 ± 1.62 6.37 ± 1.65 6.14 ± 1.41 5.81 ± 1.95 5.33 ± 1.83 5.00 ± 2.21 3.83 ± 1.68 6.28 ± 1.13 5.39 ± 1.55 4.97 ± 1.54  < 0.001

NB. Quantitative variables are expressed in mean ± SD; binary and categorical variables are expressed in absolute and relative frequencies, n (%)

QoL quality of life

1Scale for (1–7): Not relevant (1), very relevant (7)

2p-values assessing statistical differences between countries were obtained using a Chi2 test (or exact Fisher test) for categorical/binary variables and using a one-way ANOVA for quantitative variables