Table 5.

Data-generating parameters to illustrate the relationship between the $d_a$ (panels (a), (b), (c), (d) of Fig. 15) and $k_i$ (panels (e), (f), (g), (h) of Fig. 15) parameters and the resulting negative congruency effects predicted by the model

Subplot
	Parameters
	$A_0$	$k_c$	$k_i$	$d_a$	$d_c$	a	$T_{\mathit{er}}$
a	0.8	2	30	0.5	0.6	0.094	300
b	0.8	2	30	0.4	0.6	0.094	300
c	0.8	2	30	0.35	0.6	0.094	300
d	0.8	2	30	0.3	0.6	0.094	300
e	0.8	2	30	0.4	0.6	0.094	300
f	0.8	2	40	0.4	0.6	0.094	300
g	0.8	2	50	0.4	0.6	0.094	300
h	0.8	2	60	0.4	0.6	0.094	300

Note that panels (b) and (e) are identical. For these simulations, non-decision time variability is set such that $s_t=0$