Table 1.
A landscape of antibacterial performance of CTiO2@NPs against different pathogens.
| Plant species | Bacterial strain | Zone of inhibition (mm) | Bioactivity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trigonella foenum-graecum | Enterococcus faecalis | 11.4 ± 0.5 | Antimicrobial32 |
| Staphylococcus aureus | 11.2 ± 0.4 | ||
| Streptococcus faecalis | 11.6 ± 0.3 | ||
| Bacillus subtilis | 10.5 ± 0.4 | ||
| Yersinia enterocolitica | 10.6 ± 0.5 | ||
| Proteus vulgaris | 8.5 ± 0.4 | ||
| Escherichia coli | 10.8 ± 0.3 | ||
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 10.3 ± 0.4 | ||
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | 10.2 ± 0.8 | ||
| Mentha arvensis | Proteus vulgaris | 15 | Antibacterial, antifungal65 |
| Psidium guajava | Staphylococcus aureus | 25 | Antibacterial, antioxidant66 |
| Escherichia coli | 23 | ||
| Azadirachta indica | Staphylococcus aureus | 20.83 | Antibacterial67 |
| K. pnuemoniae | 16.66 | ||
| B. subtilis | 25 | ||
| S. typhi | 10.42 | ||
| Escherichia coli | 10.42 | ||
| Acorus calamus | Escherichia coli | 6 ± 0.3 | Antimicrobial68 |
| Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 8 ± 0.6 | ||
| Bacillus subtilis | 8 ± 0.4 | ||
| Staphylococcus aureus | 11 ± 0.6 | ||
| Amomum subulatum | Staphylococcus aureus | 19.5 ± 0.5 | Antibacterial, anticancer, antioxidant, antifungal (present work) |
| Bacillus subtilis | 19 ± 0.4 | ||
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | 17 ± 0.8 | ||
| Escherichia coli | 18 ± 0.3 | ||
| Candida albicans | 10.2 ± 0.5 |