TABLE 2.
Interaction between the CETP TaqIB polymorphism and DAQS on the Gensini score, syntax score, and lipid profile.
| Variables | Model crude | p a | p c | Model adjusted | p b | p c | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CETP Taq1B genotype | CETP Taq1B genotype | |||||||||
| B1B1 (n = 47) | B1B2 (n = 328) | B2B2 (n = 78) | B1B1 (n = 47) | B1B2 (n = 328) | B2B2 (n = 78) | |||||
| Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | |||||
| HDL‐c (mg/day) | ||||||||||
| Low | 49.25 ± 3.20 | 49.65 ± 1.03 | 51.28 ± 2.12 | .76 | .93 | 49.46 ± 3.12 | 49.78 ± 1.03 | 50.68 ± 2.08 | .91 | .92 |
| High | 45.78 ± 1.78 | 47.59 ± 0.81 | 49.14 ± 1.78 | .43 | 45.87 ± 1.98 | 47.52 ± 0.80 | 49.41 ± 1.69 | .38 | ||
| LDL‐c (mg/dL) | ||||||||||
| Low | 96.62 ± 9.05 | 100.63 ± 3.37 | 100.19 ± 9.67 | .94 | .88 | 97.71 ± 10.85 | 100.58 ± 3.60 | 99.92 ± 7.24 | .96 | .87 |
| High | 86.55 ± 6.10 | 97.02 ± 2.76 | 96.88 ± 6.28 | .35 | 86.68 ± 6.86 | 96.92 ± 2.79 | 97.22 ± 5.87 | .37 | ||
| TC (mg/dL) | ||||||||||
| Low | 196.10 ± 37.22 | 204.98 ± 10.22 | 191.00 ± 14.33 | .80 | .74 | 198.59 ± 29.53 | 204.50 ± 9.81 | 191.84 ± 19.69 | .84 | .80 |
| High | 203.09 ± 23.01 | 196.53 ± 6.51 | 201.55 ± 18.07 | .91 | 203.60 ± 17.96 | 196.48 ± 7.32 | 201.39 ± 15.38 | .91 | ||
| TG (mg/dL) | ||||||||||
| Low | 148.10 ± 15.79 | 144.34 ± 6.10 | 161.24 ± 19.37 | .54 | .71 | 147.71 ± 20.56 | 144.92 ± 6.83 | 159.12 ± 13.71 | .65 | .71 |
| High | 179.47 ± 20.01 | 156.86 ± 5.29 | 166.54 ± 15.91 | .34 | 178.77 ± 15.09 | 157.02 ± 6.15 | 166.32 ± 12.92 | .37 | ||
| Gensini score | ||||||||||
| Low | 35.00 ± 10.23 | 37.20 ± 3.75 | 17.33 ± 3.86 | .03 | .01 | 36.18 ± 9.85 | 36.27 ± 3.27 | 20.50 ± 6.57 | .10 | .06 |
| High | 28.29 ± 7.71 | 34.37 ± 2.66 | 43.70 ± 7.81 | .23 | 27.15 ± 7.00 | 35.02 ± 2.85 | 41.68 ± 5.99 | .28 | ||
| Syntax score | ||||||||||
| Low | 10.66 ± 3.02 | 11.12 ± 1.06 | 6.75 ± 1.57 | .15 | .07 | 10.84 ± 2.91 | 10.85 ± 0.96 | 7.73 ± 1.94 | .35 | .18 |
| High | 8.49 ± 2.60 | 10.57 ± 0.86 | 13.15 ± 2.40 | .28 | 8.26 ± 2.26 | 10.72 ± 0.92 | 12.68 ± 1.94 | .33 | ||
Note: The degrees of adherence to DAQS are classified into two categories, “high” adherence and “low” adherence, based on the median intake. p‐Values <.05 were considered significant.
Abbreviations: DAQS, dietary antioxidant quality score; HDL‐c, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL‐c, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride.
a
p based on one‐way ANOVA.
b
p adjusted for gender, smoking status, and energy.
c
Obtained from two‐way ANOVA for both model crude and adjusted.