Table 3. Evaluation of glycemic parameters.
HbA1c (%) | Total insulin dose (μg/mL) | C-peptide (ng/mL) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M±SD | p-value | M±SD | p-value | M±SD | p-value | |||
Wang et al. 18 ; Taiwan | Basal | I | 9.3±0.80 | 0.883 | ||||
C | 9.5±1.90 | |||||||
After 6 m | I | 8.5±0.90 | NI | |||||
C | 9.5±2.10 | |||||||
Kumar et al. 19 ; India | Basal | I | 11.7±1.63 | 0.512 | 1.0±0.45 | 0.183 | 0.3±0.35 | 0.866 |
C | 11.5±2.26 | 0.9±0.40 | 0.3±0.45 | |||||
After 3 m | I | 6.8±1.46 | 0.6±0.31 | 0.5±0.40 | ||||
C | 7.4±1.46 | 0.7±0.40 | 0.5±0.35 | |||||
Groele et al. 20 ; Poland | Basal | I | 7.7±0.41 | NI | 1.0±0.27 | NI | ||
C | 8.3±0.72 | 1.0±0.34 | ||||||
After 6m | I | 6.1±0.35 | 0.058 | 0.9±0.26 | 0.832 | |||
C | 6.5±0.39 | 0.9±0.27 | ||||||
Javid et al. 21 ; Iran | Basal | I | 8.9±1.95 | 0.270* | 6.4±6.32 | 0.810* | ||
C | 9.6±2.23 | 6.0±5.02 | ||||||
After 8 w | I | 8.6±1.85 | 0.960* | 10.9±8.20 | 0.150* | |||
C | 9.1±2.59 | 7.6±7.12 | ||||||
≠ I | -0.3±0.52 | 0.030† | 4.5±4.53 | 0.060† | ||||
≠ C | -0.5±1.36 | 1.6±5.46 | ||||||
Ho et al. 22 ; Canada | Basal | I | 8.0±0.82 | 0.854 | 0.9±0.25 | 0.928 | 0.3±0.75 | 0.928 |
C | 8.1±0.91 | 0.9±0.29 | 0.2±0.30 | |||||
After 3 m | I | 7.9±0.50 | 0.592 | NI | NI | 0.3±0.93 | 0.029 | |
C | 8.1±0.91 | 0.1±0.15 |
M±SD: mean±standard deviation; p: statistical difference; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin (%); I: intervention; C: control; ≠: difference; m: months; w: weeks; NI: not informed.
Used the independent t-test between the two groups before and after the intervention
Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed between the two post-intervention groups after adjustment for confounding factors.