Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain. 2022 Oct 2;24(2):204–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.08.010

Table 2.

Recommendations for Precision Pain Medicine Studies

Recommendation Benefit
1. Test for heterogeneity of treatment effect Confirms an adequate degree of inter-patient variation in treatment responsiveness to test phenotype-by-treatment interactions.
2. Select validated phenotyping measures Maximizes precision in quantifying phenotypes of interest. Facilitates comparison of findings across studies (that use validated measures).
3. Carefully consider sample size requirements Testing for phenotype-by-treatment interactions often requires large samples. Adequately powering a trial is essential in minimizing Type II error.
4. Consider crossover, or N-of-1 trials Offers much greater power (i.e., greatly reduced sample size requirements) when examining subgroup/phenotype differences in treatment response.
5. Consider stratified allocation based on phenotypes Maximizes power to detect phenotype-by-treatment interactions. When possible, implement 50:50 (i.e., equal group sizes) stratified allocation.
6. When possible, implement back-translation approaches Facilitates confirmation of hypothesized treatment targets and localization of drug/treatment effects in the nervous system.
7. Plan for phenotypic clustering Reduces concerns related to testing multiple, correlated, individual variables. Enhances power by minimizing the need for multiple comparison corrections.
8. Implement dynamic measurement in trials Accounts for naturally-occurring phenotypic variability over time, increases reliability of phenotyping measurements.