1. |
Test for heterogeneity of treatment effect |
Confirms an adequate degree of inter-patient variation in treatment responsiveness to test phenotype-by-treatment interactions. |
2. |
Select validated phenotyping measures |
Maximizes precision in quantifying phenotypes of interest. Facilitates comparison of findings across studies (that use validated measures). |
3. |
Carefully consider sample size requirements |
Testing for phenotype-by-treatment interactions often requires large samples. Adequately powering a trial is essential in minimizing Type II error. |
4. |
Consider crossover, or N-of-1 trials |
Offers much greater power (i.e., greatly reduced sample size requirements) when examining subgroup/phenotype differences in treatment response. |
5. |
Consider stratified allocation based on phenotypes |
Maximizes power to detect phenotype-by-treatment interactions. When possible, implement 50:50 (i.e., equal group sizes) stratified allocation. |
6. |
When possible, implement back-translation approaches |
Facilitates confirmation of hypothesized treatment targets and localization of drug/treatment effects in the nervous system. |
7. |
Plan for phenotypic clustering |
Reduces concerns related to testing multiple, correlated, individual variables. Enhances power by minimizing the need for multiple comparison corrections. |
8. |
Implement dynamic measurement in trials |
Accounts for naturally-occurring phenotypic variability over time, increases reliability of phenotyping measurements. |