Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2024 Feb 15;18(2):e0011822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011822

Old tools, new applications: Use of environmental bacteriophages for typhoid surveillance and evaluating vaccine impact

Yogesh Hooda 1, Shuborno Islam 1, Rathin Kabiraj 1, Hafizur Rahman 1, Himadree Sarkar 1, Kesia E da Silva 2, Rajan Saha Raju 1, Stephen P Luby 2, Jason R Andrews 2, Samir K Saha 1,3, Senjuti Saha 1,*
Editor: Elsio A Wunder Jr4
PMCID: PMC10868810  PMID: 38358956

Abstract

Typhoid-conjugate vaccines (TCVs) provide an opportunity to reduce the burden of typhoid fever, caused by Salmonella Typhi, in endemic areas. As policymakers design vaccination strategies, accurate and high-resolution data on disease burden is crucial. However, traditional blood culture-based surveillance is resource-extensive, prohibiting its large-scale and sustainable implementation. Salmonella Typhi is a water-borne pathogen, and here, we tested the potential of Typhi-specific bacteriophage surveillance in surface water bodies as a low-cost tool to identify where Salmonella Typhi circulates in the environment. In 2021, water samples were collected and tested for the presence of Salmonella Typhi bacteriophages at two sites in Bangladesh: urban capital city, Dhaka, and a rural district, Mirzapur. Salmonella Typhi-specific bacteriophages were detected in 66 of 211 (31%) environmental samples in Dhaka, in comparison to 3 of 92 (3%) environmental samples from Mirzapur. In the same year, 4,620 blood cultures at the two largest pediatric hospitals of Dhaka yielded 215 (5%) culture-confirmed typhoid cases, and 3,788 blood cultures in the largest hospital of Mirzapur yielded 2 (0.05%) cases. 75% (52/69) of positive phage samples were collected from sewage. All isolated phages were tested against a panel of isolates from different Salmonella Typhi genotypes circulating in Bangladesh and were found to exhibit a diverse killing spectrum, indicating that diverse bacteriophages were isolated. These results suggest an association between the presence of Typhi-specific phages in the environment and the burden of typhoid fever, and the potential of utilizing environmental phage surveillance as a low-cost tool to assist policy decisions on typhoid control.

Author summary

The WHO prequalified two typhoid conjugate vaccines for use to reduce the burden of typhoid fever. As policymakers design vaccination strategies, accurate, high-resolution estimates of typhoid burden are crucial for efficient use of the vaccines. Typhoid burden can vary widely; for example, in Bangladesh, burden is high in the urban capital city Dhaka, but is 100-fold lower in the rural site, Mirzapur. Optimal local data rely on traditional blood-culture-based surveillance, which is expensive and often unavailable. With the knowledge that Salmonella Typhi, cause of typhoid fever, is a water-borne pathogen, we tested an environmental surveillance tool that detects bacteriophages (viruses) against Salmonella Typhi in environmental water bodies using simple assays. Testing of 303 water samples from Dhaka and Mirzapur showed a 10-fold lower abundance of bacteriophages in Mirzapur, depicting a correlation with typhoid burden in the community. This low-cost surveillance can be employed in different regions to generate rapid data on typhoid burden for evidence-based introduction of vaccines and tracking their impact upon rollout.

Introduction

Typhoid fever is a systemic infection caused by the water-borne pathogen Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. This pathogen is common in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) causing an estimated 135,000 deaths and 14 million infections globally [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the use of typhoid conjugate vaccines in settings with high burden of typhoid fever [2,3]. Countries have begun implementing these suggestions, and several countries have performed large-scale clinical trials to demonstrate that these vaccines exhibit 80–85% efficacy in preventing infections [46]. Typhoid-conjugate vaccines are currently being utilized to tackle an extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Salmonella Typhi outbreak in Hyderabad, Pakistan, where vaccine effectiveness has been demonstrated to be high [7].

Decisions are currently being made to roll out typhoid-conjugate vaccines in other endemic countries, however, accurate and high-resolution spatial data regarding the burden of typhoid is required for optimal use of the available vaccines. The current estimates of burden of typhoid fever in countries have primarily come from modelling studies based on limited surveillance data and do not provide the geographical and temporal resolution within local communities and countries to design effective preventive and treatment measures. The paucity of the data is in large part because traditional blood culture surveillance is resource extensive, requires clinical laboratory infrastructure and trained health and research professionals. Consequently, very few LMICs routinely conduct these studies, and a few that do, tend to focus on high-risk urban settings, and are not able to sustain these studies as a regular part of health infrastructure. This has led to search for low-cost and sustainable methods to supplement traditional clinical surveillance systems [8,9]. To this end, environmental surveillance strategies that can identify Salmonella Typhi in different water supply have been proposed. In recent years, environmental wastewater surveillance has been used for early detection and monitoring the spread of SARS-CoV-2 [10,11] and poliovirus [12] among others.

Previous studies have shown that high detectable levels of Salmonella Typhi in the water supply overlaps with areas of disease burden, suggesting sampling water could be utilized as a preliminary surveillance proxy [8,13]. While it has not been possible to reproducibly culture Salmonella Typhi directly from environmental water, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) has been proposed to detect Salmonella Typhi DNA [9,14]. However, qPCR-based methods cannot be replicated in most settings with typhoid burden, due to the lack of infrastructure (machines, molecular techniques etc.) and the associated high costs. To address this gap, we investigated if the presence of bacteriophages in the environmental water samples could be used as a proxy to estimate the prevalence of Salmonella Typhi in water bodies.

Bacteriophages (or phages) are viruses that infect bacteria and bacterial abundance, phenotypic characteristics, and long-term evolutionary trajectory. Bacteriophages are very specific to their host bacterial species and often able to discriminate between different sub-populations based on minor genetic differences in host receptor and surface epitopes [15]. Bacteriophages against Salmonella Typhi (Typhi phages) were first reported in the 1940’s [16]. Typhi phages were extensively used for bacterial typing in the 1940s-80s before the advent of molecular diagnostic methods such as PCR and genomic sequencing [17]. However, little has been done in the last 50 years and there is a lack of contemporary literature regarding Typhi phages from typhoid-endemic countries. This motivated us to initiate a pilot study to determine the feasibility of detecting Salmonella Typhi-specific phages in water bodies and typhoid burden at two geographic regions: Dhaka, a city of 9 million people with a high typhoid burden and Mirzapur, a rural district with 340,000 people that has low typhoid burden. Overall, our work serves as a pilot study aimed at investigating the potential correlation between the prevalence of Typhi bacteriophages and the local typhoid burden.

Methods

Ethics statement

The protocols of this study were approved by the ethics review committee of the Bangladesh Institute of Child Health, BSHI. For the hospitalized cases, informed written consent were taken from parents/legal guardians of all participants.

Data from clinical surveillance and ethical considerations

The clinical laboratories of Bangladesh Shishu Hospital and Institute [BSHI], Shishu Shasthya Foundation Hospital [SSFH], and Kumudini Women Medical College and Hospital [KWMCH] are part of the laboratory network of Child Health Research Foundation CHRF, where all data are stored electronically. These laboratories are part of the WHO-supported Invasive Bacterial Vaccine Preventable Surveillance conducted at the CHRF and has been described earlier [18]. Data on blood culture surveillance was obtained from these electronic records.

Environmental sample collection and bacteriophage isolation

Water samples were collected from sewage drains, rivers, ponds, lakes, and stagnant water bodies selected based on accessibility. Stagnant water bodies are defined as temporary water bodies that form after flooding or rainfall that cannot be used for livestock or human use, often due to poor water quality. A sterile cup, attached to a rope, was used to collect >10 ml of water sample from each source. Maintaining sterile techniques, the sample was transferred into a sterile bottle for transportation. Ten ml of the sample was centrifuged at 500x g for 5 minutes in a 15 ml conical tube to pellet large soil debris. The supernatant was passed through a 0.22 μm PES syringe filter into a new tube. The filtered sample was stored at 4°C up to 72 hours before use for further experiments.

A total of 500 μl of the filtered water sample was mixed with 450 μl of LB broth and 50 μl of overnight liquid Salmonella Typhi strain BRD948 culture in a 2 ml microcentrifuge tube. Salmonella Typhi strain BRD948 is an attenuated strain derived from the laboratory strain Ty2, allowing for processing of the samples in a Biosafety Level-2 facility. The strain does not contain any antibiotic resistance plasmids and is thus susceptible to most antibiotics. This mixture was incubated at 37°C for 2 hours followed by the addition of 2–3 drops of chloroform and vortexing to lyse and kill all bacteria in the mixture without affecting bacteriophages. The mixture was then centrifuged at 10,000x g for 10 minutes and 750 μl of the supernatant potentially containing enriched Salmonella Typhi bacteriophages was transferred to a new tube.

Bacteriophage detection & propagation

For bacteriophage detection, the enriched sample was tested using the double-layer agar method described earlier [19]. In brief, 100 μl of the sample was incubated with 200 μl of overnight culture of Salmonella Typhi strain BRD948 for 20 minutes. The entire 300 μl was mixed with 4 ml of molten soft agar (0.7% agar) and poured over solid hard agar plates (1.5% agar). These plates were incubated at 37°C for 14–16 hours and the appearance of plaques the next day indicated the presence of bacteriophages in the sample. For each plaque morphology, a plaque was picked using a 100 μl pipette tip and resuspended in 100 μl of tryptic soy broth. Two drops of chloroform were added to the resuspension followed by 10 minutes of incubation, and a final centrifugation at 10,000x g for 10 minutes. 70 μl of the supernatant was transferred to a new tube which contained a clone of phages of a single morphology. To calculate phage titers for each isolated phage (in plaque forming units or pfu), we spotted 2 μl of the supernatant at 100, 102, 104 and 106 dilutions on a lawn of Salmonella Typhi strain BRD948.

Activity spectra of Typhi phages

To confirm that these phages are Typhi specific, 2 μl of at least 3.5 * 103 pfu/ml of isolated phages were spotted on strains of Salmonella enterica serovars Paratyphi A (E321: 1100582310), Paratyphi B (366817) and Typhimurium LT2, and Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli (ATCC: 25922), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC: 700603 & ATCC: 9349) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC: 27853) using the double layer methodology.

To test diversity of the phages, 2 μl of at least 3.5 * 103 pfu/ml of isolated phages were also spotted on 16 Salmonella Typhi isolates collected from blood culture belonging to different genotypes previously described to be present in Bangladesh [20]. The plates were incubated overnight at 37°C for 14–16 hours and the plates were visualized for zones of clearing. Killing activities against the different genotypes were recorded and hierarchical clustering and heat map was generated using the R package gplots.

RFLP assay

To determine diversity of the phages, 20 of the 86 phages representing different killing spectra were selected for restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). First, 350 pfu/ml of each phage sample was incubated with 200 μl of overnight culture of Salmonella Typhi strain BRD948 for 20 minutes, and then mixed with 4 ml of molten soft agar and poured over solid hard agar plates to obtain confluent lysis. The plates were incubated at 37°C overnight [21]. The next day, 4 ml of LB was added to each plate and incubated at 4°C for 4 hours to elute phages from the top layer. The liquid was transferred to a 15 ml tube, followed by the addition of 4 drops of chloroform and vortexing. The mixture was centrifuged at 10,000x g for 10 minutes and the supernatant was transferred to a new tube.

To remove any residual bacterial DNA and RNA present in the lysate, 450 μl of the supernatant was incubated with 50 μl DNase I 10x buffer, 1 μl DNase I (1 U/μl), and 1 μl RNase A (10 mg/ml) for 1.5 h at 37°C without shaking. 20 μl of 0.5 M EDTA (final concentration 20 mM) was added to inactivate DNase I and RNase A after incubation. To digest phage protein capsids, 1.25 μl of Proteinase K (20 mg/ml) was added and incubated for 1.5 h at 56°C without shaking. DNA extraction was conducted using the DNAeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, 69504) using Manufacturer’s instructions. 5 μl of extracted DNA was run on a 1% agarose gel to visualize the purified phage DNA. The concentration and quality of the DNA was assessed using the Nanodrop.

200 ng DNA were digested with NheI (10 U/μl) and XbaI (15 U/μl) restriction enzymes in a single 10 μl reaction for 1 hr at 37°C, followed by heat inactivation at 65°C for 20 mins. The different DNA fragments were visualized by running 5 μl of digested DNA on a 0.8% agarose gel. The gel image was analyzed using Fiji [22] to identify different gel bands and the molecular weights of each band was estimated using a 1kb Plus DNA ladder (ThermoFisher Scientific, 10787026) as reference.

Results

Clinical typhoid surveillance

Since 2012, we have been conducting surveillance to monitor enteric fever, pneumonia, meningitis, and sepsis (as part of the Invasive Bacterial Vaccine Preventable Disease Surveillance of the WHO) in two hospitals in urban Dhaka (BSHI and SSFH), and in one hospital in Mirzapur (KWMCH), a rural district approximately 60 km north of Dhaka [18,23]. In 2021, we performed 4,620 blood cultures in BSHI and SSFH, of which 215 (4.7%) were culture-confirmed for Salmonella Typhi. In contrast, at KWMCH, during the same period 3,788 blood cultures were performed and only 2 (0.05%) were culture-confirmed for Salmonella Typhi (Table 1). The burden of culture-confirmed cases of typhoid fever in Mirzapur is 100-fold lower.

Table 1. Blood culture positivity of Salmonella Typhi in clinical surveillance, and bacteriophage positivity in environmental water samples in Dhaka and Mirzapur, Bangladesh.

Study site in Bangladesh Type of surveillance Type of sample Total no. of samples tested No. of Salmonella Typhi/phage positive samples % Positive samples
Dhaka Clinical surveillance Blood 4620 215 5%
Environmental surveillance Sewage 168 51 30%
Lake 18 10 56%
Pond 15 2 13%
River 5 2 40%
Stagnant water 5 1 20%
Total 211 66 31%
Mirzapur Clinical surveillance Blood 3788 2 0.05%
Environmental surveillance Sewage 3 1 33%
Pond 48 0 0%
River 4 0 0%
Stagnant water 37 2 5%
Total 92 3 3%

Environmental phage surveillance

Between August 2021 and December 2021, we collected 211 environmental water samples in the Dhaka region. These samples constituted of sewage water (n = 168), lake (n = 18), pond (n = 15), river (n = 5) and stagnant water (n = 5) from different sites across Dhaka (Fig 1A). Sixty-six of the 211 samples (31%) exhibited plaque formation, and in all cases, the plaques could be propagated confirming the presence of active bacteriophages. We observed at least two morphologies in 16 samples suggesting different phages in the same sample. Phages of different morphologies could be further purified during propagation bringing the total number of isolated lytic phages to 82 from 211 samples in Dhaka. The distribution of positive and negative samples showed that Typhi phages were present in all types of water bodies tested (Table 1).

Fig 1. Location of water sample collection and detection of Salmonella Typhi phages in water samples.

Fig 1

Water sampling was conducted in two districts in Bangladesh: urban Dhaka and rural Mirzapur, Bangladesh. The water bodies sampled where Typhi-bacteriophages were detected are shown in blue while the water bodies where no Typhi-bacteriophages were found are shown in red. The map was obtained from the database of Global Administrative Areas (GADM), a free and open-source database (license: https://gadm.org/license.html, CC BY) through the R packages maps and maptools.

In contrast, a total of 92 environmental samples were collected during the same time from the Mirzapur region (Fig 1B). These samples constituted of sewage water (n = 3), pond (n = 48), river (n = 4), and stagnant water (n = 37). A total of 3 samples showed positive phage lytic activity in the 92 samples tested (3%), the details of which are provided in Table 1. Two different plaque morphologies were noted in one sample, bringing a total of 4 isolated phages from these 92 samples (Table 1). No phages were detected in ponds or rivers; one positive sample was from sewage water (n = 1, 33%) and two from stagnant water. Overall, phage prevalence in water bodies in Dhaka (31%) was 10-fold higher than that in water bodies in Mirzapur (3%), correlating with the culture-confirmed typhoid cases in the largest hospitals of the regions.

Host range and diversity of Typhi phages

To test the specificity of phages isolated, we tested all 86 isolated phages against closely related Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium, Paratyphi A and Paratyphi B, and closely related Enterobacteriaceae species Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Another gamma-proteobacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa was also included. No cross activity was observed, depicting that these phages are highly specific to Salmonella Typhi.

Next, to understand the diversity of the phages collected, we tested the killing spectrum of the 86 phages against a panel of 16 Salmonella Typhi strains each representing a different genotype circulating in Bangladesh [20] (Fig 2). The phages showed a diverse killing spectrum and could be grouped into 48 clusters based on their killing activity. This demonstrated that the circulating Salmonella Typhi strains in Bangladesh are not equally susceptible to all environmental phages; some are more susceptible than others. In addition, phages with different plaque morphologies from the same sample often displayed (for example DK_23.1 and DK_23.2) different spectra, indicating that multiple phages can circulate in the same water body at the same time.

Fig 2. Hierarchical clustering of the activity spectra of the 86 bacteriophages isolated in the study.

Fig 2

All isolated phages were spotted on Salmonella Typhi isolates belonging to different genotypes (Y-axis) circulating in Bangladesh. Green represents activity/plaque formation, white represents no activity/no plaque formation. The phages on the X-axis are labelled based on the site of isolation. Phages from Mirzapur are labelled as MZ, and From Dhaka are labelled as DK. Multiple phages isolated from the sample are indicated with .1 and .2 at the end of the label. The heatmap was made using the R package gplots. The RFLP types determined by digestion with XbaI/NheI are also shown. Attenuated Salmonella Typhi strain Ty2, BRD948, is denoted as Ty2.

To investigate the genetic diversity of the phages, we optimized a restriction fragment length polymorphism (or RFLP) assay using NheI and XbaI on 20 different phages with different killing activity [24,25]. In total, we observed 14 RFLP types based on fragment size from 17 phages that gave a clear banding pattern (Figs 2 and S1). The fragment sizes ranged from 1,000 bp to 15,000 bp. Two phages that had similar killing spectra (DK_181 and DK_209) showed similar banding patterns in the RFLP assay. Interestingly, two pairs of phages (DK_102.1/DK_102.2; RFLP type-5 and DK_129.1/DK_129.2; RFLP type-7) showed different morphology and activity spectra but had the same RFLP type. Taken together, the distinct RFLP types observed confirmed the genetic diversity of the isolated phages.

Discussion

Our pilot study shows that detection of bacteriophages specific to Salmonella Typhi may be a rapid environmental surveillance method to understand the presence of typhoid fever in the community. 33% of environmental samples collected in Dhaka contained phages, where blood culture positivity was 5%; by comparison, 3% of environmental samples collected in Mirzapur contained phages, where blood culture positivity was 0.05%. Of all the sources of water collected, 75% (52/69) of samples were collected from sewage indicating that wastewater surveillance is well-suited for monitoring typhoid fever. In Dhaka, a city with high burden of typhoid fever, high phage positivity was also seen in water samples collected from lakes (56%) and rivers (40%).

Given the minimal resources required for undertaking environmental phage surveillance, it can be readily rolled out in resource-constrained settings and can complement existing surveillance strategies. Sample processing primarily includes collection bottles and/or tubes, syringes with 0.22 μm syringe filters, petri dishes, media for bacterial growth, an incubator, a centrifuge, pipettes, and the laboratory strain BRD948 of Salmonella Typhi (See Methods). The cost for consumables for each sample is less than USD 10 in Bangladesh (this might vary slightly based on location). Such low costs of sample collection and easy processing means that phage surveillance is more scalable than PCR-based molecular methods, which are both resource and expertise intensive. Furthermore, the stability of phages [26] in water means that samples can be collected from across the country and tested at any location without loss of quality of the results obtained. In contrast, environmental DNA degrades fast, and thus PCR based surveillance typically requires transport of refrigerated or frozen samples.

Limited work has been done in investigating the role that phages play in the ecology of Salmonella Typhi. The abundance and diversity of Typhi phages in terms of the killing spectrum and the genetic sequences highlight that Typhi bacteriophages are likely to play an important role in determining the spread and seasonality of Salmonella Typhi. Additionally, certain genotypes of Salmonella Typhi (such as 1.2.1, 2.2 and 4.3.1.1) are more resistant to phages vs others (such as 4.3.1.2, 4.3.1 and 2.5). The molecular basis of the observed differences in phage resistance amongst different genotypes may be due to differences in receptor sequences and/or modifications, or presence of phage defense systems (such as CRISPR-Cas). Future studies addressing these questions may be helpful in determining the impact phages have on the circulating Salmonella Typhi population [27,28]. Additionally, with rising antimicrobial drug resistance, renewed research on Typhi phages might provide alternate therapeutics for clinical development.

The results in this study should be interpreted within the context of the following limitations. First, the number of samples obtained does not fully represent the number of water bodies present in Dhaka or Mirzapur. Second, no water sampling could be conducted from July-August during the study period due to monsoon-associated floods. Third, all phage amplification steps were done using Salmonella Typhi strain BRD948, and hence phages that do not infect this strain were missed. In future studies, a derivative of this strain could be developed with no restriction modification or phage defense systems. This would increase the number of phages identified. Fourth, sewage samples were underrepresented in Mirzapur due to lack of a sewage system in many rural areas. Finally, comparison with the PCR-based assays will be required to identify the specificity and sensitivity of phage detection. Expansion of this study to other regions of Bangladesh where clinical data is available will help in resolving some of these limitations. It would also be helpful to examine temporal trends in phage positivity and how these trends correlate with the seasonality of typhoid fever.

In summary, in this study, we propose a simple, cost-effective, and scalable method for conducting environmental surveillance for typhoid fever. The method uses standard microbiological laboratory infrastructure and techniques to detect Typhi-specific bacteriophages. Environmental phage surveillance can be used to estimate typhoid in other countries, including in Sub-Saharan Africa where limited epidemiological data on typhoid fever is available [29,30]. Environmental phage surveillance may be also applied to map routes of disease transmission by focusing on wastewater/sewage facilities in the region. This tool, combined with traditional blood culture surveillance [31], can generate community-level data to evaluate the impact of interventions including the introduction of TCV, water improvement projects, and sanitation and hygiene systems.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay on 20 phages.

DNA was isolated from phages and was digested with NheI/XbaI. The images before (top left) and after (top right) lane and band identification. The table (bottom) shows the predicted band sizes. Based on the band patterns, different phages were assigned a RFLP-Type.

(TIFF)

Data Availability

All data is present in the manuscript and its supporting files.

Funding Statement

The present study was the funded by a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV003717) to SS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Stanaway JD, Parisi A, Sarkar K, Blacker BF, Reiner RC, Hay SI, et al. The global burden of non-typhoidal salmonella invasive disease: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19: 1312–1324. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30418-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Andrews JR, Qamar FN, Charles RS, Ryan ET. Extensively Drug-Resistant Typhoid—Are Conjugate Vaccines Arriving Just in Time? N Engl J Med. 2018;379: 1493–1495. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1803926 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Saha SK, Tabassum N, Saha S. Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine: An Urgent Tool to Combat Typhoid and Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance. J Infect Dis. 2021;224: S788–S791. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shakya M, Colin-Jones R, Theiss-Nyland K, Voysey M, Pant D, Smith N, et al. Phase 3 Efficacy Analysis of a Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine Trial in Nepal. N Engl J Med. 2019;381: 2209–2218. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1905047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Qadri F, Khanam F, Liu X, Theiss-Nyland K, Biswas PK, Bhuiyan AI, et al. Protection by vaccination of children against typhoid fever with a Vi-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine in urban Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised trial. The Lancet. 2021;398: 675–684. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01124-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Patel PD, Patel P, Liang Y, Meiring JE, Misiri T, Mwakiseghile F, et al. Safety and Efficacy of a Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine in Malawian Children. N Engl J Med. 2021;385: 1104–1115. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Batool R, Tahir Yousafzai M, Qureshi S, Ali M, Sadaf T, Mehmood J, et al. Effectiveness of typhoid conjugate vaccine against culture-confirmed typhoid in a peri-urban setting in Karachi: A case-control study. Vaccine. 2021;39: 5858–5865. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Andrews JR, Yu AT, Saha S, Shakya J, Aiemjoy K, Horng L, et al. Environmental Surveillance as a Tool for Identifying High-risk Settings for Typhoid Transmission. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2020;71: S71–S78. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Saha S, Tanmoy AM, Andrews JR, Sajib MSI, Yu AT, Baker S, et al. Evaluating PCR-Based Detection of Salmonella Typhi and Paratyphi A in the Environment as an Enteric Fever Surveillance Tool. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019;100: 43–46. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Karthikeyan S, Levy JI, De Hoff P, Humphrey G, Birmingham A, Jepsen K, et al. Wastewater sequencing reveals early cryptic SARS-CoV-2 variant transmission. Nature. 2022;609: 101–108. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05049-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Karthikeyan S, Ronquillo N, Belda-Ferre P, Alvarado D, Javidi T, Longhurst CA, et al. High-Throughput Wastewater SARS-CoV-2 Detection Enables Forecasting of Community Infection Dynamics in San Diego County. mSystems. 2021;6: e00045–21. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00045-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Asghar H, Diop OM, Weldegebriel G, Malik F, Shetty S, El Bassioni L, et al. Environmental Surveillance for Polioviruses in the Global Polio Eradication Initiative. J Infect Dis. 2014;210: S294–S303. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sikorski MJ, Levine MM. Reviving the “Moore Swab”: a Classic Environmental Surveillance Tool Involving Filtration of Flowing Surface Water and Sewage Water To Recover Typhoidal Salmonella Bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86: e00060–20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00060-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu P, Ibaraki M, Kapoor R, Amin N, Das A, Miah R, et al. Development of Moore Swab and Ultrafiltration Concentration and Detection Methods for Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A in Wastewater and Application in Kolkata, India and Dhaka, Bangladesh. Front Microbiol. 2021;12: 684094. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.684094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.De Smet J, Hendrix H, Blasdel BG, Danis-Wlodarczyk K, Lavigne R. Pseudomonas predators: understanding and exploiting phage–host interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15: 517–530. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Felix A. World survey of typhoid and paratyphoid-B phage types. Bull World Health Organ. 1955;13: 109–170. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Farmer JJ, Hickman FW, Sikes JV. Automation of Salmonella typhi phage typing. Lancet Lond Engl. 1975;2: 787–790. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)80004-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Saha S, Islam M, Uddin MJ, Saha S, Das RC, Baqui AH, et al. Integration of enteric fever surveillance into the WHO-coordinated Invasive Bacterial-Vaccine Preventable Diseases (IB-VPD) platform: A low cost approach to track an increasingly important disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11: e0005999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kropinski AM, Mazzocco A, Waddell TE, Lingohr E, Johnson RP. Enumeration of Bacteriophages by Double Agar Overlay Plaque Assay. In: Clokie MRJ, Kropinski AM, editors. Bacteriophages: Methods and Protocols, Volume 1: Isolation, Characterization, and Interactions. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2009. pp. 69–76. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-164-6_7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tanmoy AM, Westeel E, Bruyne KD, Goris J, Rajoharison A, Sajib MSI, et al. Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi in Bangladesh: Exploration of Genomic Diversity and Antimicrobial Resistance. mBio. 2018;9: e02112–18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02112-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jakočiūnė D, Moodley A. A Rapid Bacteriophage DNA Extraction Method. Methods Protoc. 2018;1: 27. doi: 10.3390/mps1030027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9: 676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Saha S, Islam M, Saha S, Uddin MJ, Rahman H, Das RC, et al. Designing Comprehensive Public Health Surveillance for Enteric Fever in Endemic Countries: Importance of Including Different Healthcare Facilities. J Infect Dis. 2018;218: S227–S231. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gutiérrez D, Martín-Platero AM, Rodríguez A, Martínez-Bueno M, García P, Martínez B. Typing of bacteriophages by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR to assess genetic diversity. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2011;322: 90–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02342.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ali S, Karaynir A, Salih H, Öncü S, Bozdoğan B. Characterization, genome analysis and antibiofilm efficacy of lytic Proteus phages RP6 and RP7 isolated from university hospital sewage. Virus Res. 2023;326: 199049. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2023.199049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jończyk E, Kłak M, Międzybrodzki R, Górski A. The influence of external factors on bacteriophages—review. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2011;56: 191–200. doi: 10.1007/s12223-011-0039-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Faruque SM, Naser IB, Islam MJ, Faruque ASG, Ghosh AN, Nair GB, et al. Seasonal epidemics of cholera inversely correlate with the prevalence of environmental cholera phages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102: 1702–1707. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408992102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.LeGault KN, Hays SG, Angermeyer A, McKitterick AC, Johura F, Sultana M, et al. Temporal shifts in antibiotic resistance elements govern phage-pathogen conflicts. Science. 373: eabg2166. doi: 10.1126/science.abg2166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Carey ME, Steele AD. The Severe Typhoid Fever in Africa Program Highlights the Need for Broad Deployment of Typhoid Conjugate Vaccines. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69: S413–S416. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kim CL, Cruz Espinoza LM, Vannice KS, Tadesse BT, Owusu-Dabo E, Rakotozandrindrainy R, et al. The Burden of Typhoid Fever in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Perspective. Res Rep Trop Med. 2022;13: 1–9. doi: 10.2147/RRTM.S282461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang Y, Moe CL, Dutta S, Wadhwa A, Kanungo S, Mairinger W, et al. Designing a typhoid environmental surveillance study: A simulation model for optimum sampling site allocation. Epidemics. 2020;31: 100391. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2020.100391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011822.r001

Decision Letter 0

Elsio A Wunder Jr

15 Aug 2023

Dear Dr. Saha,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Old tools, new applications: use of environmental bacteriophages for typhoid surveillance and evaluating vaccine impact" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations. Take special consideration on comments from Reviewer #2 (Comment 3) about the use of different molecular techniques.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Elsio A Wunder Jr, DVM, Ph.D.

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: This study is well designed and its simplicity enviable. All questions and objections are clearly stated. Please see the comments to the author's for a more detailed analysis and specific recommendations and questions.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Methodology is appropriate, but need citations.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: The analysis conducted is appropriate and the results are well stated. Figure one could be more clear, see below for details.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: The results brings, in fact, surveillance strategy for typhoid surveillance, but the evaluation of vaccine impact is poorly assessed.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: The conclusions are supported by the data, the authors consider the limitations of their proposed surveillance technique, and implications and utility are thoroughly discussed.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: The conclusions are in accordance with study data.

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: Only minor changes are needed in terms of editing and data presentation. Based on my questions below, the authors may elect to provide changes not explicitly requested here.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: I recommend to check image quality/resolution.

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: Review of Hooda et al. Old tools, new applications: use of environmental bacteriophages for typhoid surveillance and evaluating vaccine impact

Critical to eradicating vaccine-preventable diseases is knowing where to deploy vaccines. This report provides a cheap, reproducible, and tractable method for monitoring the infection burden of Salmonella enterica Typhi – the causative agent of typhoid. While infectious of typhoid are globally distributed, there is a particular prevalence in lower resourced countries, furthering the need for cheap methods for monitoring regional infection burden. The techniques used in this manuscript are well explained and easily reproducible and the experiments used to validate the methods employed herein are robust and convincing.

Based on the above criteria, I support publication of this report in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases with only minor changes. Below I have provided comments and suggestions on how to improve the manuscript as well as a suggested control that would substantially increase the impact of the work.

Experimental Suggestion:

1. A negative control looking at the presence (or hopefully the absence) of S. Typhi phages from water samples in a region with no confirmed typhoid infections would substantially increase the impact of this work and make the method extremely convincing.

Major Comments and Suggestions

1. Figure one is difficult to interpret, in particular the fact that the inset maps have the same background is confusing. Does the Dhaka area include Mirpur and the other named location? Are all sampling locations found off of the N4 (assuming that’s what the pink line is)? Do the inset boxes have the same distance scaling?

2. It is the author’s intent for this method to be generalizable and used for surveillance, but they mention as a limitation that only phages that infect their isolation host (Ty2) will be isolated with this method. Therefore, it is necessary for the authors to justify using Ty2 as the sole isolation host. Is it known that a large variety of phages can infect this strain? Does this strain lack phage defenses as many other common phage isolation hosts due (e.g. E. coli C or S. aureus RN4220)? Do all the clinically relevant strains infect this strain?

Minor Comments and Suggestions

1. The introduction gives focus to wastewater surveillance. Why were only three sewage samples taken from Mirzapur? Would the same high degree of positive samples be expected should the number of samples be increased?

2. There are a few small typographical errors that would be caught by a careful re-reading such as “The burden of culture-confirmed cases of typhoid fever in Mirzapur in 100-fold lower,” on line 173.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript titled “Old tools, new applications: use of environmental bacteriophages for typhoid surveillance and evaluating vaccine impact” suggests that it is possible to detect the presence of Salmonella Typhi bacteriophages in environmental water samples as an alternative to the traditional blood culture monitoring method to determine the typhoid burden. The main aim of the study was to determine the relationship of bacteriophages to the typhoid burden in the environment and to examine the usability of this information to aid typhoid control. The authors state that the environmental bacteriophage surveillance method can also be used in other epidemiological data-deficient regions due to its easy applicability, low cost, and speed of data generation. The authors also discussed that isolated bacteriophages have potential to be used not only as a monitoring tool but also for phage therapy in the future. Overall, the article is well written and the methodology is solid. The authors detailed the methods they used to collect and analyze the water samples. The authors of the study summarized the research findings in a clear and understandable way and emphasized the practical importance of their findings. They also discuss the limitations of the study and suggest directions for future research.

However, the article could be improved in several ways. Please find my comments below:

1- Firstly, the authors can provide more information about the Salmonella Typhi strains used in the study. In particular, it should be explained in a few sentences why Salmonella Typhi strain Ty2 was selected for resource enrichment and all phage amplification steps. This information is important for the interpretation of results, as different strains of Salmonella Typhi may be more or less susceptible to bacteriophages.

a) Example sentence 1; Salmonella Typhi strain Ty2 was selected as indicator bacteria in all phage amplification steps. Because the Ty2 strain is a strain that is weak or lacking in CRISPR-Cas and/or restriction endonucleases that are associated with phage defense systems.

b) Example sentence 2; Salmonella Typhi strain Ty2 was selected as indicator bacteria in all phage amplification steps. Because Ty2 is both a laboratory strain and a strain with low pathogenicity, it was preferred in terms of work safety.

Please add a sentence or two to the methodology section or discussion section of the manuscript to explain why you chose the Salmonella Typhi strain Ty2 (as in the two examples above).

2- The Methods section describes the methods used. However, I think some steps should be explained in more detail and clearly. This may help other researchers repeat similar studies.

a) Please include the centrifuge pattern throughout the text or calculate centrifuge speed in "g" instead of "rpm".

b) What is the titer of the phages applied on the bacteria in the spot-test experiment conducted under the title of "Activity spectra of Salmonella Typhi bacteriophages"? If known, please indicate the applied phage titers in one sentence (For example, 2 µl of phage stocks with titers ranging from 108 Pfu/ml or 106-108 Pfu/ml were dropped on bacterial grass).

c) Page 8, lines 151-155: 2 µl dilutions of isolated bacteriophages were dropped onto bacteria using double layer methodology. If 2 µl dilutions in the sentence mean the direct filtrate of each phage clone, please correct the dilution expression as filtrate. If it is meant to be dilutions prepared from phage filtrate, indicate how many fold it was diluted and used.

d) Page 8, line 151 and Page 11, line 205: It is stated that 14 Salmonella Typhi strains representing different genotypes circulating in Bangladesh were used to understand the bacteriophage diversity. However, the number of bacteria tested on the X-axis of picture 2 shown in the results is more than 14. There is an inconsistency between picture 2 and the sentences. Please check and fix the incompatibility.

3- To determine the diversity of 86 bacteriophages isolated in the study, the authors tested the bacteriophages against a panel of 14 Salmonella Typhi strains, each representing a different genotype, and grouped the phages into 48 clusters according to their killing activity..

a) Adjusting different phages to the same titer and testing under a single experimental condition makes the results more reliable and comparable. This helps to more accurately assess the true killing capacity of different phages. The titer of the 86 phages tested in the study was not predetermined (or not specified in the article). For this reason, the grouping approach based on the killing spectra specified in the manuscript may offer limited perspective.

b) The lytic spectrum data indicated by the article is important in grouping isolated bacteriophages, and grouping phages based on a particular killing activity may offer a way to initially understand different activity levels. However, if the authors have the means and technical equipment, my recommendation is to use more detailed molecular techniques, such as restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis or randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR techniques, which may be helpful in grouping phages and assessing their genetic variation more precisely. .

c) Also, grouping phages with RFLP or RAPD-PCR techniques has other advantages. If the authors decide to sequence these phages for further molecular characterization in the future, phages that are identical at the genome level will be less likely to be sequenced multiple times. This will reduce the sequencing cost of the authors.

d) For the benefit of the authors, I include below the DOI numbers of two studies that performed phage typing using RFLP analysis and RAPD-PCR techniques.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02342.x

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2023.199049

Conclusion:

Overall, the article is well written, organized and provides solid evidence to support the research findings. The results of the article are interesting and important, showing that Salmonella Typhi bacteriophages can play an important role in determining the spread and seasonality of bacteria. These findings will be valuable for future research to develop new methods to monitor and control Salmonella Typhi. I believe that with the corrections to be made by paying attention to the points I mentioned above, the article will be accepted as a better understandable and valuable contribution.

Reviewer #3: The paper brings a relevant strategy for monitoring an emergent disease and could be very usefull to avoid burdens of typhoid fever burdens, specially where material and logistical resources are scarce.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Abdulkerim Karaynir

Reviewer #3: Yes: Thiago Accioly

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article's retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PNTD-D-23-00752.pdf

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011822.r003

Decision Letter 1

Elsio A Wunder Jr

27 Nov 2023

Dear Dr. Saha,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Old tools, new applications: use of environmental bacteriophages for typhoid surveillance and evaluating vaccine impact' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Elsio A Wunder Jr, DVM, Ph.D.

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Elsio Wunder Jr

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011822.r004

Acceptance letter

Elsio A Wunder Jr

22 Jan 2024

Dear Dr. Saha,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Old tools, new applications: use of environmental bacteriophages for typhoid surveillance and evaluating vaccine impact," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay on 20 phages.

    DNA was isolated from phages and was digested with NheI/XbaI. The images before (top left) and after (top right) lane and band identification. The table (bottom) shows the predicted band sizes. Based on the band patterns, different phages were assigned a RFLP-Type.

    (TIFF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PNTD-D-23-00752.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_reviewers_21112023.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All data is present in the manuscript and its supporting files.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES