Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 14;44(7):e1528232023. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1528-23.2023

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Optogenetic LC-NA stimulation did not significantly impact behavioral performance on the well-learned lever task. A,B, Percent correct performance did not differ across sexes or LC-NA stimulation groups during the pre-stimulation period (A), nor was percent correct performance altered by LC-NA stimulation (B). C, The number of trials performed per session did not differ across sex or LC-NA stimulation groups during the pre-stimulation period. D, During stimulation, we observed a sex-specific difference in task engagement, but no significant differences across LC-NA treatment groups. #p < 0.05, sex effect, two-way ANOVA. E,F, Lever-pressing speed did not differ across sex or LC-NA stimulation group during the pre-treatment period (E) nor did LC-NA stimulation impact pressing speed (F). G, The total number of laser stimulation trains delivered did not differ significantly across LC-NA treatment groups but was higher overall in male rats compared to female rats.