Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 14;44(7):e1528232023. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1528-23.2023

Table 1.

Results of two-way ANOVA testing for effects of sex and stimulation treatment on cortical motor map representations

Two-way ANOVA
psex [Fsex] pstim [Fstim] pinteraction [Finteraction]
Total map area (mm2) 0.172 [1.96] 0.074 [2.39] 0.186 [1.66]
Posterior body area (mm2) 0.038 [4.72] 0.089 [2.24] 0.167 [1.74]
Anterior body area (mm2) 0.300 [1.11] 0.074 [2.39] 0.175 [1.71]
DFL area (mm2) 0.956 [0.0] 0.079 [2.34] 0.511 [0.84]
PFL area (mm2) 0.891 [0.02] 0.000 [15.52] 0.938 [0.2]

ICMS-evoked movements at threshold amplitudes were classified as posterior body (trunk, hindlimb, or tail), anterior body (vibrissa, jaw, or neck), distal forelimb (DFL), or proximal forelimb (PFL) movements. Consistent with prior reports, sex-specific effects were found in the posterior body map area. Stimulation-specific effects were found only for the task-relevant PFL representation. Bold denotes statistical significance (p < 0.05).