Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 14;44(7):e1528232023. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1528-23.2023

Table 2.

Results of two-way ANOVA testing for effects of sex and LC stimulation frequency on behavior

Two-way ANOVA
psex [Fsex] pstim [Fstim] pint [Fint]
Pre-stimulation baseline performance
 Percent correct 0.668 [0.19] 0.571 [0.68] 0.312 [1.26]
 Trials per session 0.436 [0.63] 0.383 [1.06] 0.931 [0.15]
 Pressing speed 0.288 [1.18] 0.498 [0.82] 0.056 [2.90]
Performance during stimulation
 Percent correct 0.682 [0.17] 0.234 [1.52] 0.115 [2.20]
 Trials per session 0.008 [8.21] 0.360 [1.12] 0.960 [0.10]
 Total stimulations 0.011 [7.58] 0.599 [0.64] 0.941 [0.13]
 Pressing speed 0.131 [2.45] 0.789 [0.35] 0.106 [2.27]
Percent change from baseline to treatment period
 Percent correct 0.341 [0.94] 0.585 [0.66] 0.685 [0.50]
 NumTrials 0.007 [8.79] 0.068 [2.71] 0.710 [0.46]
 Pressing speed 0.214 [1.63] 0.838 [0.28] 0.243 [1.49]

During the stimulation period, but not during the pre-stimulation period, a sex-specific effect was observed in the total number of trials performed per session and in the total number of stimulations received. No effects of LC-NA stimulation frequency or sex × stimulation interaction effects were observed for any performance parameter during the pre-stimulation or stimulation periods. Bold denotes statistical significance (p < 0.05).