Skip to main content
. 2023 May 4;42(2):253–264. doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01758-z

Fig. 2. AAV-mediated in vivo prime editing efficiency is dependent on the type of edit.

Fig. 2

a, Editing activity of PE2 and PE4 in N2a cells by plasmid transfection for four different edits at Dnmt1. N2a cells were transfected with either PE2 and pegRNA or PE4 (PE2 + MLH1dn) and pegRNA. Three days later, gDNA was harvested and analyzed by HTS. Dots represent values, and bars represent means of n = 2 biological replicates. b, In vivo editing activity of v1 PE3-AAV9 delivered to neonatal C57BL/6 pups on P0 by ICV at a total dose of 1 × 1011 vg (5 × 1010 vg per half). Cortex (neocortex and hippocampus) was harvested, nuclei were isolated and sorted by FACS into bulk and GFP+ populations, and gDNA was analyzed by HTS. Dots represent individual mice, and error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. of n = 3–4 mice; each condition includes both male and female mice. c, In vivo editing activity of PE3 delivered via v1 PE3-AAV9 by RO injection to 6–8-week-old C57BL/6 mice at a total dose of 1 × 1012 vg. Three weeks after injection, bulk tissues were harvested and gDNA was isolated and analyzed by HTS. Dots represent individual mice, and error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. of n = 3 mice; each condition includes both male and female mice.