Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 20;17:100312. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100312

Table 2.

Study characteristics AS.

Author, y, JBI Country Design Period Spine level Imaging Fracture assessment AS criteria Mean age (SD) % Male Disease duration years (SD) AS cases No. with VF % VF
Kim 2022, 7 [11] Korea Cross-sectional 2012–2020 T-L Radiograph NS MNY 47.6 (13.8) 66 4.1 (3.9) 219 20 9.1
Fauny 2021, 7 [12] France Cross-sectional 2009–2017 C-T-L Radiograph Genant MNY 60.3 (10.7) 89 24 (12–34)* 73 9 12.3
Beek 2019, 9 [28] Netherlands Longitudinal 2003–2014 T-L Radiograph Genant MNY 42.8 (10.2) 70 11.9 (9.5) 135 15 11.1
Maas 2017, 9 [29] Netherlands Longitudinal 2004–2012 T-L Radiograph Genant MNY 42.8 (12.5) 70 16 (8-25)* 292 59 20.0
Van der Weijden 2016, 8 [30] Netherlands Longitudinal NS T-L Radiograph Genant MNY 41.8 (9.2) 82 12.2 (9.1) 49 6 12.2
Rossini 2016, 8 [31] Italy Cross-sectional 2012–2014 T-L Radiograph Genant MNY 47 (NS) 83 11.5 (NS) 71 18 25.4
Kang 2014, 9 [32] Korea Longitudinal 2007–2013 L Radiograph Genant MNY 33.9 (10.9) 80 3.8 (5.1) 298 31 10.8
Ulu 2013, 8 [34] Turkey Cross-sectional 2007–2011 T-L Radiograph Genant MNY 34.5 (9) 80 4.8 (4.8) 86 24 27.9
Ulu 2013, 8 [35] Turkey Cross-sectional 2011–2012 T-L Radiograph Genant MNY 34.3 (9.4) 85 11.5 (7.5) 59 18 30.5
Klingberg 2012, 8 [36] Sweden Cross-sectional 2009–2009 C-T-L Radiograph Genant MNY 50 (13) 57 24 (13) 204 24 11.8
Montala 2012, 8 [33] Spain Cross-sectional NS T-L Radiograph Genant MNY 48.6 (13.1) 78 22.5 (12.6) 176 57 32.4
Arends 2011, 9 [37] Netherlands Cross-sectional 2004–2009 T-L Radiograph Genant MNY 41 (11.1) 73 14 (NS) 128 41 32
Mermerci 2010, 8 [38] Turkey Cross-sectional NS T-L Radiograph >15% any height MNY 39.9 (10.9) 75 10.5 (7.8) 100 19 19
Ghozlani 2009, 9 [39] Morocco Cross-sectional 2007–2008 T-L Radiograph Genant MNY 38.9 (11.8) 84 10.8 (6.6) 80 34 42.5
Caglayan 2007, 7 [40] Turkey Cross-sectional NS L Radiograph Genant MNY 36.8 (NS) 100 7.6 (6.8) 38 8 21.1
Jun 2006, 8 [41] Korea Cross-sectional 2004–2004 T-L Radiograph Genant MNY 30.7 (6.5) 100 7.2 (5.4) 68 11 16.2
Lange 2005, 6 [42] Germany Cross-sectional NS T-L Radiograph Genant NY 44 (NS) 63 19.5 (NS) 84 9 10.7
Baek 2004, 8 [43] Korea Cross-sectional 1997–1998 C-T-L Radiograph Genant MNY 28.1 (7.9) 100 9.4 (5.1) 76 3 3.9
Maillefert 2001, 8 [44] France Cross-sectional NS T-L Radiograph Genant MNY 37.3 (11.3) 65 12.4 (8.6) 54 2 3.7
Toussirot 2001, 7 [45] France Cross-sectional 1997–1999 L Radiograph Genant MNY 39.1 (11.5) 69 10.6 (8.3) 71 1 1.4
Mitra 2000, 7 [46] England Cross-sectional NS T-L Radiograph McCloskey MNY 37.8 (NS)* 100 9.9 (NS)* 66 11 16.7
Sivri 1996, 6 [47] Turkey Cross-sectional NS T-L Radiograph >20% for T and >15% for L NY 36.8 (6.3) 91 9.8 (6.8) 22 9 40.9
Donnelly 1994, 7 [48] England Cross-sectional NS T-L Radiograph McCloskey NY 43.9 (NS) 71 16.4 (NS) 87 8 9.2
Cooper 1994, 8 [49] USA Cross-sectional 1935–1989 T-L Radiograph Radiologist report MNY 33.8 (12.3) 77 NS 158 15 9.5
Devogelaer 1992, 6 [50] Belgium Cross-sectional NS T-L Radiograph Genant NY 38.4 (NS) 86 15.1 (NS) 70 3 4.3
Ralston 1990, 8 [51] Scotland Cross-sectional NS C-T-L Radiograph >20% for T and >15% for L MNY 41 (NS) 88 17 (NS) 111 20 18

JBI, Johanna Briggs Institute quality score; VF, vertebral fracture; SD, standard deviation; NS, not specified; C, cervical; T, thoracic; L, lumbar; MNY, modified New-York criteria; NY, New-York criteria.

median (interquartile range). Genant = Genant et al. [72]; McCloskey = McCloskey et al. [73]