Table 1.
Renal cancer biomarker types, potential clinical applications, and challenges.
| Biomarker | Clinical utility | Challenges |
|---|---|---|
| Histology: subtyping based on sarcomatoid or rhabdoid features | Prognostication and treatment consideration | Applicable only to the group of patients presenting with sarcomatoid or rhabdoid features |
| Histology: nomograms | Risk stratification | The current risk stratification based on nomograms is not sufficient |
| Tumor-centric genetic biomarkers | Prognostication | Lack of treatment options based on the targets. Lack of evidence for efficacy |
| Plasma: ctDNA | Diagnosis, evaluation of treatment options, prediction of treatment outcome, monitoring, and detection of relapse | Low level of ctDNA released from renal cancers; methods need optimization |
| Plasma: CTCs | Knowledge of cancer biology and metastatic process, prediction of therapy response, and prognostication | Technical optimization of CTC enumeration |
| TCR | Immune health | Determination of neoantigen targets |
| Microbiome | Understanding the impact on tumorigenesis, immunity and immune response in relation to immunotherapies, and new treatment options | Multiple bacterial species that may have similar agonistic/antagonistic roles. Interactions with immune and other cell types are very complex |
| Single cell/spatial omics | Characterize RCC cell populations and immune composition to discover new biomarkers | Comprehensive data analysis, high levels of technical noise, lack of good reference material, and data standardization |
| Radiomics | Diagnosis of small tumors from benign cases, grading, subtyping, prediction of treatment efficacy, and prognostication | Lack of standardization of scanning protocols and analysis tools across studies |