Skip to main content
Clinical Microbiology Reviews logoLink to Clinical Microbiology Reviews
. 2023 Nov 28;36(4):e00156-22. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00156-22

Diagnosis and management of cryptococcal meningitis in HIV-infected adults

Thomas C McHale 1,, David R Boulware 1, John Kasibante 2, Kenneth Ssebambulidde 2, Caleb P Skipper 1,#, Mahsa Abassi 1,#
Editor: Graeme N Forrest3
PMCID: PMC10870732  PMID: 38014977

SUMMARY

Cryptococcal meningitis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, especially in people with advanced HIV disease. Cryptococcal meningitis is responsible for nearly 20% of all deaths related to advanced HIV disease, with the burden of disease predominantly experienced by people in resource-limited countries. Major advancements in diagnostics have introduced low-cost, easy-to-use antigen tests with remarkably high sensitivity and specificity. These tests have led to improved diagnostic accuracy and are essential for screening campaigns to reduce the burden of cryptococcosis. In the last 5 years, several high-quality, multisite clinical trials have led to innovations in therapeutics that have allowed for simplified regimens, which are better tolerated and result in less intensive monitoring and management of medication adverse effects. One trial found that a shorter, 7-day course of deoxycholate amphotericin B is as effective as the longer 14-day course and that flucytosine is an essential partner drug for reducing mortality in the acute phase of disease. Single-dose liposomal amphotericin B has also been found to be as effective as a 7-day course of deoxycholate amphotericin B. These findings have allowed for simpler and safer treatment regimens that also reduce the burden on the healthcare system. This review provides a detailed discussion of the latest evidence guiding the clinical management and special circumstances that make cryptococcal meningitis uniquely difficult to treat.

KEYWORDS: cryptococcal meningitis, cryptococcal antigen, amphotericin, flucytosine, fluconazole, lumbar puncture, antiretroviral therapy, HIV/AIDS

INTRODUCTION

Cryptococcus neoformans is the primary etiologic agent of cryptococcal meningitis, which is a leading cause of meningitis globally, with a disproportionate burden of disease in sub-Saharan Africa (1). In a recent analysis of UNAIDS data published through 2020, Rajasingham et al. found that cryptococcal disease was responsible for 19% of all global AIDS-related deaths (2). Despite advancements in screening, therapeutics, and access to antiretroviral therapy (ART), the proportion of AIDS-related deaths caused by cryptococcosis was essentially unchanged from a similar analysis of data through 2014 (3). While cryptococcal meningitis is the most recognizable clinical disease, C. neoformans causes disseminated infection throughout the body including the brain parenchyma (4). This understanding of the infection distribution has led many countries to develop screening programs to identify early cryptococcal disease using cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) testing and prevent the progression to meningitis. Cryptococcal meningitis occurs most commonly in HIV-infected persons with a CD4+ T-cell count <100 cells/µL (3). Even when appropriate therapy is available, mortality during the acute manifestation of the disease is high but starkly disproportionate by geographic region, ranging from 10% to 15% in resource-rich countries to 60% in resource-poor countries (57). Furthermore, long-term complications can be debilitating including blindness, deafness, and neurocognitive impairment (8). In recent years, there have been exciting new developments in both diagnostics and treatment modalities that have led the WHO to revise their guidelines for cryptococcal meningitis management (9, 10).

DIAGNOSIS OF CRYPTOCOCCAL MENINGITIS

Diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis has changed dramatically over time. Fungal culture of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has historically been the gold standard for diagnosis with India ink being an essential adjunctive modality for decades. However, people with lower fungal burdens present a significant challenge to diagnosis. Typical CSF findings, which include a white blood cell count <50 cells/µL with a mononuclear predominance, slightly elevated protein and low to normal glucose, can be suggestive of cryptococcosis if suspicion is high, and classic diagnostic tests are negative (11, 12). However, with the advent of antigen testing, the sensitivity and specificity for cryptococcal meningitis can approach 100%, even with costs that are feasible in low-income settings and require minimal laboratory expertise (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Overview of diagnostic modalities for cryptococcal meningitis

Methodology Sensitivity Specificity Limitations
CSF culture 82.4–94.2% 100% Time to diagnosis ~1–2 weeks. Limited sensitivity, especially in low fungal burden
Blood culture 50% 100% Poor sensitivity
India ink staining 42–86% 100% Requires laboratory expertise. Limited sensitivity, especially in low fungal burden
CSF cryptococcal antigen 99.1–100% 99.1%-100% Prozone effect can reduce sensitivity in very high fungal burden cases. Test characteristics depend on the manufacturer.
Serum/plasma cryptococcal antigen 92–100% 86–100% Prozone effect can reduce sensitivity in very high fungal burden cases. Test characteristics depend on the manufacturer.
CSF 1,3-β-D-glucan 89% 85% Sensitivity reduced by low-level production in the fungal cell wall. Non-specific marker, limited specificity.
Molecular testing 50–96% 96–99% Poor sensitivity especially in low fungal burden, high cost, requires technical laboratory skills

Cryptococcal culture

Historically, the gold standard for cryptococcal meningitis diagnosis has been the isolation of the Cryptococcus organism on fungal culture from the infected fluid or tissue. Sabouraud dextrose agar is the most commonly used culture medium for isolating the yeast. However, growth can take 3–7 days, and the sensitivity is limited by false-negatives, which are common in individuals with low fungal burden (13). In one large cohort, culture sensitivity was related to the input volume, where sensitivity was 82.4% with 10 µL of CSF increasing to 94.2% when 100 µL of CSF was used (6, 14). Blood cultures can also be useful as they are highly specific but are limited by a sensitivity of ~50% (15). While the time to result limits its utility for medical decision-making in the acute setting, CSF culture remains an important tool in confirming microbiologic control of Cryptococcus during induction therapy. CSF culture is also important in differentiating between meningitis relapse versus paradoxical immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) after initial therapy (16). Furthermore, quantitative cryptococcal culture utilizes a specialized technique that can be useful in the research setting. Serial quantitative cultures have a linear log10 clearance rate, which can be used to calculate the early fungicidal activity (EFA) of different antifungal regimens. EFA has been shown to reliably predict cryptococcal-related mortality and has been used in numerous clinical trials to establish the utility of new drugs or evaluate various combinations of therapies for Cryptococcus (Table 2) (17, 18). The FDA has allowed for the use of surrogate endpoints in clinical trials in order to reduce the time and resources needed to conduct trials and identify new therapies (17). In a recent pooled cohort study evaluating data from three clinical trials, EFA < 0.2 log10 CFU/mL/day was shown to be an independent predictor of 18-week mortality (17). The use of EFA as a surrogate endpoint has allowed for much greater advancements in our understanding of cryptococcal disease through smaller, less resource-intensive studies that can be done within a shorter time scale (17).

TABLE 2.

Summary of clinical trials for induction therapy regimensa

Setting Regimen 10 -week mortality EFA N Reference
Vietnam AMB monotherapy (28 days) 44.4% 0.31 99 (19)
AMB + 5FC 30% 0.42 100
AMB + fluconazole (800 mg/day) 33% 0.32 99
South Africa AMB + 5 FC 30% 0.41 21 (20)
AMB + fluconazole (800 mg/day) 33.3% 0.38 22
AMB + fluconazole (1,200 mg/day) 27.3% 0.41 23
AMB + voriconazole 25% 0.44 13
Uganda AMB (5 days) + fluconazole (1,200 mg/day) 28% 0.30 30 (21)
South Africa AMB + 5FC 32% 0.49 30 (22)
AMB + 5 FC + IFN-γ 30% 0.64 60
Malawi AMB (7 days) + fluconazole (1,200 mg/day) 37.5% 0.38 19 (23)
AMB (7 days) + fluconazole (1,200 mg/day) + 5FC 46.2% 0.50 18
Uganda Fluconazole (1,200 mg/day) 48% 0.18 30 (24)
Fluconazole (800 mg/day) 60% 0.07 30
Uganda AMB + fluconazole (800 mg/day) + sertraline 40%
(18 weeks)
0.43 128 (25)
Malawi Fluconazole (1,200 mg/day) 58% 0.11 20 (26)
Fluconazole (1,200 mg/day) + flucytosine 43% 0.28 21
Malawi, Zambia, Tanzania, Cameroon AMB 1 week + either 5FC or fluconazole 36.2% 0.40 179 (27)
AMB 2 week + either 5FC or fluconazole 39.7% 0.42 182
Fluconazole (1,200 mg/day) + flucytosine 35.1% 0.26 182
AMB + 5FC 31.1% 0.46 186
AMB + fluconazole (1,200 mg/day) 45% 0.36 175
Botswana, Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, Zimbabwe Single-dose liposomal Amphotericin B + 5 FC + Fluconazole (1,200 mg/day) 24.8% 0.40 407 (28)
a

EFA = early fungicidal activity, AMB = Amphotericin B deoxycholate; 5FC = flucytosine at 100 mg/kg/day in ~4 divided doses. Amphotericin given for 2 weeks unless otherwise noted.

India ink staining

India ink staining utilizes direct visualization and can be useful in reducing the time to diagnosis which complicates the utility of traditional culture methods. India ink takes advantage of the thick polysaccharide capsule which appears translucent against the darkly stained yeast under microscopy. While India ink preparation has a strong specificity of up to 100%, it is limited by poor sensitivity, ranging from 42% to 86% for initial or relapse diagnosis, decreasing with lower CSF fungal burden (14, 29, 30). Moreover, in one study in Uganda, where the prevalence of Cryptococcus was high, the use of India ink as the only diagnostic test had the potential of missing 8.8% of cryptococcal diagnoses (14).

Cryptococcal antigen

Given the many limitations of older diagnostic tools, the detection of CrAg has emerged as the new gold standard for diagnosing cryptococcal meningitis and is recommended by the WHO as the first-line diagnostic test (10). The CrAg can be detected in the blood or CSF using latex agglutination, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), or lateral flow assay (LFA). Each of these modalities has varying utility depending on the circumstances, but all have sensitivity and specificity that range from 99.1% to 100% when testing CSF (14, 31, 32). While the ELISA and latex agglutination assays have shown major improvements in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and reduced intensity of resources, they still require a cold chain for specimen transport and technical expertise (32). The CrAg LFA (Immy Inc., Norman, OK, USA) which was first released in 2011, can be performed at the bedside and requires minimal expertise (Fig. 1) (14, 32). This CrAg LFA developed and produced by Immy is FDA-approved and has been validated in multiple clinical studies and has emerged as the new gold standard for cryptococcal diagnosis. However, there are other non-FDA-approved CrAg LFAs available internationally from a variety of manufacturers that should generally be avoided as clinical validation studies have revealed inferior performance (3335).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Instructions for cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay (CrAg LFA) screening that can be completed at the bedside or as near-patient testing. (Courtesy of Immy, Inc., reproduced with permission.)

In the largest validation study of CrAg diagnostics to date, the Immy CrAg LFA was validated in multiple clinical sites across Uganda and South Africa, which enrolled 832 persons with suspected meningitis and tested 666 CSF samples (14). Since the antigen tests have higher sensitivity than previously used diagnostics, a composite reference was used as the gold standard. This included CSF culture with positive cryptococcal growth or a negative culture with at least two other positive test results such as India ink, CrAg LFA, or CrAg latex agglutination, with no alternative diagnosis (14). When testing CSF, the CrAg LFA had a sensitivity of 99.3%, specificity of 99.1%, positive predictive value of 99.5%, and negative predictive value of 98.7% for diagnosing cryptococcal meningitis (14). The CrAg latex agglutination had a sensitivity of 97.8%, specificity of 85.9%, positive predictive value of 92.6%, and negative predictive value of 95.5% for diagnosing cryptococcal meningitis (14).

CrAg LFA and latex agglutination tests also performed well in diagnosing cryptococcal meningitis when testing peripheral fluid compartments including serum, plasma, and urine. Testing serum CrAg LFA had a sensitivity of 99.6% and specificity of 92%, while CrAg agglutination had a sensitivity of 98.3% in the serum (14). In the same study, plasma was retrospectively analyzed and found to have a sensitivity of 100%, but specificity was unable to be done (14). Capillary blood (i.e., fingerstick) CrAg LFA has been shown to have 100% agreement with whole blood, plasma, and serum CrAg. Fingerstick CrAg LFA also has a 100% negative predictive value for the exclusion of cryptococcal meningitis (36). The CrAg LFA had a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 85% for cryptococcal meningitis when testing urine.

One potential rare limitation of the CrAg LFA is the influence of the “prozone phenomenon” that occurs when there is an excess of antigen relative to antibodies leading to the formation of antigen-antibody complexes that hinder the agglutination reaction resulting in a false negative result. For example, a study in South Africa showed a surprisingly low sensitivity of 92%; however, when paired with Gram staining to determine the presence of yeast coupled with a dilution of samples, sensitivity improved to 100% (37). Another example of the “prozone effect” was observed at a CrAg LFA titer of 1:1,310,000, where the yeasts were obvious on a Gram stain of the CSF (38). These studies show that the prozone phenomenon occurs only at exceedingly high CrAg titers and can be mitigated with the use of gram staining or serial dilutions when suspicion for cryptococcal meningitis is high.

Quantitative CrAg titers can be useful as a prognostic marker for cryptococcal mortality. In a study in Thailand, a CrAg latex agglutination titer was shown to have a moderate positive correlation with pre-therapy quantitative cultures (R2 = 0.5) and a strong association with 2- and 10-week mortality (39). However, CrAg LFA was shown to have a strong positive association with quantitative cultures (R2 = 0.7), and an increasing 2- and 10-week mortality with each twofold increase in CrAg LFA titer (40). Because quantitative CrAg titers are more difficult to perform than the simple point-of-care testing, a semi-quantitative CrAg LFA was developed to provide rapid prognostic data (38). The semi-quantitative CrAg-SQ (Immy Inc., Norman, OK, USA) provides 1+ to 5+ grades, which corresponded to median CrAg titers of 1:10, 1:60, 1:7,680, 1:81,920, and 1:1,474,000, respectively, when performed on CSF (38). The sensitivity and specificity of the CrAg-SQ test on CSF were 100% for cryptococcal meningitis (38). CSF CrAg-SQ of 3+ or higher was associated with 100% fungal culture positivity (38). Two-week mortality for individuals with CSF CrAg-SQ grades of 1+ to 3+ was 5% compared to 21% for those individuals with grades 4+ and 5+ (38). This new CrAg-SQ test largely maintains the ease of use, arguably improves the diagnostic accuracy of CrAg testing, and provides useful prognostic information for clinicians and patients.

While the baseline CrAg titer levels have been shown to strongly correlate with clinical outcomes, including 2- and 10-week mortality, as discussed above, the use of CrAg titers to monitor response to therapy has not been shown to be useful. In 1994, Powderly et al. evaluated two clinical trials to evaluate the use of CSF CrAg to monitor response to therapy (41). They found that those who had a good response had higher rates of CSF CrAg titer decrease, but this difference failed to reach statistical significance (41). However, a rise in CSF CrAg titer was associated with cryptococcal relapse. While it is likely that persistently elevated CrAg titers indicate poorer prognosis, this has not been shown to be clearly useful in measuring treatment response (42).

The remarkable predictive value of CrAg testing has facilitated the large-scale expansion of CrAg testing into screening programs aimed at identifying individuals with cryptococcal antigenemia, who are at higher risk for developing cryptococcal meningitis. In a study conducted in rural Uganda, individuals with CD4 counts <100 cells/µL and symptoms of meningitis were found to have a CrAg positivity of 5.8% and a population-attributable risk for mortality of 18% (43). Subsequently, multiple studies demonstrated the utility of serum CrAg screening programs in reducing HIV-associated cryptococcal disease-related mortality, as discussed in the CrAg screening section below (44, 45).

1,3-β-D-glucan

The non-specific fungal marker (1, 3),-β-D-glucan is produced by Cryptococcus and can be a useful tool in the management of cryptococcal meningitis. In a population from Uganda and South Africa, the Fungitell β-D glucan (BDG) assay (Associates of Cape Cod Inc, East Falmouth, MA, USA) had 89% sensitivity and 85% specificity in CSF for cryptococcal meningitis diagnosis (46). Serum sensitivity and specificity were poor at 79% and 61%, respectively. Individuals with high fungal burdens [>10,000 colony forming units (CFU)/mL] had markedly improved BDG CSF sensitivity of 98%. High concentrations of BDG (>500 pg/mL) were associated with threefold higher 10-week mortality. The same study showed the CSF BDG rapidly normalizes within the first week of induction therapy, which compares favorably to CrAg levels which may remain persistently elevated despite appropriate therapy. Because of this, BDG may also be useful in differentiating relapse cryptococcal meningitis from IRIS, but this has not been systematically studied (46). Another study conducted during an outbreak of meningitis, showed that BDG had a 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity for diagnosing fungal meningitis, in general (47). A common misperception, propagated by the recommended, incorrect FDA warning label for the serum BDG assay, is that BDG offers no utility for diagnosing Cryptococcus (48, 49). However, these data indicate that while BDG is not a candidate for replacing CrAg testing, it can serve as a useful marker for prognosis and response to therapy.

Molecular testing

Finally, molecular testing has emerged as an alternative diagnostic modality, especially in resource-rich environments; however, it remains limited by poor sensitivity in individuals with low fungal burdens. The CSF BioFire FilmArray (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA) has included Cryptococcus on its panel of molecular diagnostics. In a validation study in Uganda, the FilmArray had a reasonable sensitivity and specificity of 96% for detecting Cryptococcus >100 CFU/mL (50). However, this sensitivity dropped to 50% in individuals with low fungal burdens (<100 CFU/mL). Similar findings were demonstrated in Los Angeles, California, where the BioFire panel was determined to have an overall sensitivity and specificity of 96.4% and 99.6%, respectively, when compared to culture (51). When compared to CrAg LFA, the sensitivity decreased to 83.8%, while specificity remained high. However, all false-negative results on the BioFire panel were associated with recurrent cryptococcal cases, indicating that the panel remains a good diagnostic tool for the initial diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis. Still, the cost-intensive nature and failure to improve the diagnostic accuracy of simpler and cheaper tests will likely limit the usefulness of molecular testing in much of the world. Quantitative PCR is theoretically possible to estimate the quantitative CSF culture burden and predict culture sterility; however, this has not been developed.

Neuroimaging

Generally, lumbar puncture may safely be performed without prior neuroimaging in the absence of focal neurologic deficits, which may indicate a mass or space-occupying lesion (52). If focal deficits are present, neuroimaging by CT or MRI should be done prior to lumbar puncture. Mass lesions may be a contraindication to lumbar puncture in some cases and can suggest an alternative diagnosis, such as toxoplasmosis, tuberculosis, or lymphoma as neuro-cryptococcomas are relatively rare, especially in people with HIV (53). If imaging is consistent with hydrocephalus, placement of ventricular shunt may be required once the diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis has been confirmed (54).

MANAGEMENT OF CRYPTOCOCCAL INFECTION

The management of cryptococcal infection is particularly challenging given the variety of available therapeutics with different levels of efficacy and the predominance of affected persons in resource-limited parts of the world. In recent years, there have been multiple ground-breaking clinical trials that have resulted in the WHO releasing updated guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cryptococcal meningitis in 2018 and 2022 (9, 10). In addition, the development of diagnostics with the capacity to identify cryptococcosis in the subclinical phase has led to a push for better screening, surveillance, and intervention programs. Given this, we would break down the management of cryptococcal meningitis into four key phases: screening, induction, consolidation, and maintenance phases (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Outline of the four-phases of management for cryptococcal meningitis

Screening Induction Consolidation Maintenance
Goal Identify and treat individuals with undetected disseminated cryptococcosis Rapidly reduce cryptococcal burden from the CNS Control of cryptococcal organisms from the CNS Prevent relapse of cryptococcal meningitis
Population All individuals with HIV who have a CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/µL All individuals with positive plasma or CSF CrAg testing and evidence of disseminated cryptococcosis All individuals treated with induction therapy for cryptococcal infection All individuals treated with consolidation therapy for cryptococcal infection
Diagnostic Intervention Plasma CrAg ± CSF CrAg Plasma and/or CSF CrAg
Therapeutic Intervention Fluconazole 800 mg/day for 10 weeks
OR
(Under investigation)
Fluconazole 1,200 mg/day plus flucytosine 100 mg/kg/day for 14 days
OR
Single-dose liposomal amphotericin B plus fluconazole 800 mg/day for 10 weeks
Single-dose liposomal amphotericin B plus fluconazole 1,200 mg/day and flucytosine 100 mg/kg/day
OR
Amphotericin B deoxycholate 1 mg/kg/day plus flucytosine 100 mg/kg/day for 7 days
OR
Fluconazole 1,200 mg/day plus flucytosine 100 mg/kg/day for 14 days
Fluconazole 800 mg/day for 8 weeks after induction therapy Fluconazole 200 mg/day for up to 12 months or until immune system reconstitution

The screening phase is focused on identifying persons with undetected disseminated cryptococcosis, or cases when Cryptococcus is affecting multiple organ systems which may or may not include the central nervous system (CNS). The target population are persons who are asymptomatic or with mild symptoms that have not advanced enough to result in detection by the medical system. The screening phase should include persons with CD4 counts <200 cells/µL (55). As discussed above, serum or plasma CrAg testing is sufficient to identify disseminated cryptococcosis, even in asymptomatic individuals.

The induction phase occurs for those who present with acute symptoms of cryptococcal meningitis, involves hospitalization, and emphasizes the use of combination antifungal therapy to rapidly kill the fungus and management of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). The consolidation phase occurs after discharge from the hospital, when antifungal therapy is deescalated, and ART is initiated. Finally, the maintenance phase further deescalates antifungal therapy in an effort to prevent the recurrence of cryptococcal meningitis until immune recovery.

CrAg screening and treatment of high-risk persons

In two large cohorts of persons with HIV and CD4 counts <100 cells/µL in both South Africa and Uganda, despite fluconazole administration for cryptococcal antigenemia, mortality at 6 months remained high at ~25% (56, 57). Individuals with cryptococcal antigenemia had a 3.3-fold increased risk of death compared to those without antigenemia (56, 57). Similar results were found in Uganda in a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial, where a screen and treat program was implemented in a randomly selected cluster of Kampala Capital City Authority clinics every 2 months. Participants with CD4 counts <100 cells/µL and positive plasma CrAg without signs and symptoms of meningitis were treated with fluconazole 800 mg/day for 2 weeks, followed by 400 mg/day for 8 weeks (58). Of the CrAg-positive individuals who received fluconazole preemptive therapy, 7.9% developed cryptococcal meningitis, and 6-month survival was 79.6% overall. However, outcomes varied by baseline plasma CrAg LFA titer. Of CrAg-positive persons with baseline plasma CrAg titer ≥1:160, 36% failed preemptive fluconazole therapy, compared to 13% among participants with plasma CrAg titer ≤1:160. In a systematic review of all studies evaluating CrAg screening programs, Ford et al. found that 18.6% of CrAg-positive cases were identified in persons with a CD4 count of 101–200 cells/µL (55), which leads us to recommend screening in all individuals with CD4 count <200 cells/µL. Serum and plasma CrAg titers are approximately equivalent (14), yet recent CrAg screening programs have utilized plasma for CrAg testing from the leftover CD4 remnants, typically as reflexive tests when the CD4 <100 or <200 cells/µL.

Outcomes from CrAg screening programs indicate that fluconazole monotherapy is inadequate for treating disseminated cryptococcosis, even before there has been proven invasion of the CNS. Subsequent cohorts have evaluated the use of lumbar puncture to identify those with CNS involvement and found that those with CSF CrAg positivity had markedly higher mortality than those with only CrAg antigenemia (59, 60). In 2018, the WHO updated their Cryptococcus guidelines to recommend lumbar puncture for those with cryptococcal antigenemia, regardless of symptoms (9). Some experts disagree and believe that using CrAg titer to risk stratify is a better method that contains less risk and is more cost-effective.

CrAg screening programs have found that higher plasma CrAg titers predict the likelihood of CSF CrAg positivity and are independently associated with mortality, as shown in Fig. 2 and 3 (5962). For example, nearly 60% of people with plasma CrAg titers of 1:1,280 or greater are also CSF CrAg-positive (4). Still, in these cohorts, 60% of individuals with asymptomatic cryptococcal antigenemia who died had a negative CSF CrAg at baseline (4). Therefore, it is crucial to recognize that early brain parenchymal CNS infection can be present in the absence of cryptococcal infection in the CSF anatomical space. Given the independent predictability for mortality of CrAg titers ≥1:640, these persons should be managed as CNS cryptococcal infection, regardless of CSF CrAg results. In these persons with high CrAg titers, the role of lumbar puncture becomes important not for diagnosis but as an adjunctive therapeutic measure to reduce elevated intracranial pressure, if present. Since fluconazole monotherapy alone is imperfect for those with higher plasma CrAg titers ≥1:160, further clinical trials are ongoing to optimize their management. Three strategies are possible. First, we recommend at a minimum, the use of fluconazole 800 mg/day for 10 weeks in asymptomatic CrAg-positive persons, followed by secondary prophylaxis until immune reconstitution (4). A second strategy to increase antifungal therapy is to use adjunctive flucytosine with fluconazole (4, 63). Molloy et al. demonstrated that this was safe and as effective as 2 weeks of IV amphotericin in cryptococcal meningitis (27). Unfortunately, flucytosine remains widely unavailable in sub-Saharan Africa and prohibitively expensive in the United States ($425 /day) (4), although less expensive than a hospitalization. A third strategy being tested in a randomized clinical trial is giving single-dose liposomal amphotericin at 10 mg/kg, followed by standard fluconazole management for preemptive therapy of asymptomatic persons with high plasma CrAg titers (see registration no. NCT03945448 at Clinicaltrials.gov). This strategy is as effective as induction therapy in cryptococcal meningitis (28, 64). Regardless of the strategy, HIV therapy should be delayed 2 weeks after starting antifungals (65).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Survival in CrAg-positive persons by quantitative plasma cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) LFA titer. (Modified from reference 66.)

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Plasma CrAg titer predicts CSF cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) titer positivity in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Over 60% of persons with plasma titers ≥1:640 will have positive CSF titer. 19% of asymptomatic persons with plasma CrAg titer ≥1:2,560 will have positive CSF CrAg titer. (Based on data from reference 4.)

Induction antifungal therapy for cryptococcal meningitis

Prior to 2018, the WHO recommended first-line induction therapy including 14 days of intravenous amphotericin B deoxycholate (0.7–1.0 mg/kg/day) with flucytosine 100 mg/kg/day in four divided doses (9). In 2018, Molloy et al. evaluated five antifungal combinations for induction therapy of cryptococcal meningitis in Zambia, Malawi, Cameroon, and Tanzania, including fluconazole (1,200 mg) plus flucytosine (100 mg/kg) for 14 days, deoxycholate amphotericin B (1 mg/kg) plus fluconazole (1,200 mg) or flucytosine (100 mg/kg) for 7 days, followed by fluconazole (1,200 mg) for 7 days, and deoxycholate amphotericin B plus fluconazole (1,200 mg) or flucytosine (100 mg/kg) for 14 days (27). They found that all combinations of therapy that included flucytosine were superior to non-flucytosine-containing regimens (Fig. 4). They also found that 1 week of deoxycholate amphotericin was non-inferior to 2 weeks of deoxycholate amphotericin and resulted in fewer severe and life-threatening toxicities (i.e., grades 3–5 adverse events). The 10-week mortality in the deoxycholate amphotericin plus flucytosine group was 31% compared to 45% in the deoxycholate amphotericin plus fluconazole group (P value = 0.002) (27). The 1-week deoxycholate amphotericin plus flucytosine group had a 24% mortality compared to 38.3% mortality in the 2-week deoxycholate amphotericin plus flucytosine group with a hazard ratio of 0.56 (95% CI = 0.35–0.91) (27). Finally, the all-oral regimen of 2 weeks flucytosine and fluconazole had a hazard ratio of 0.87 (95% CI = 0.6–1.27), which was non-inferior to the 2-week deoxycholate amphotericin and flucytosine group (27). The rate of grade 3 or 4 anemia in the 1-week deoxycholate amphotericin group was 13.8% compared to 26.3% in the 2-week deoxycholate amphotericin group (27). This high-quality trial confirmed the findings of many smaller studies that came before, that flucytosine is essential during the acute phase of cryptococcal infection for reducing mortality, and that a shorter course of amphotericin deoxycholate, with the appropriate partner drug, remains effective while reducing the incidence of drug-related adverse events. Flucytosine is a molecule that is taken up into the fungal cell and converted to 5-fluorouracil and acts as a potent RNA and DNA synthesis inhibitor. Because the mechanism requires intracellular access, medications that disrupt the fungal cell wall like amphotericin and fluconazole have been thought to potentiate the effect of flucytosine (25, 67, 68).

Fig 4.

Fig 4

10-week mortality by antifungal regimen for cryptococcal meningitis from the clinical trial by Molloy et al. in top section (separated by red line) and Jarvis et al. in bottom section (27, 28). Proportions dying by 10 weeks for each group are represented by diamonds and 95% CI is represented by error bars.

The WHO updated their guidelines in 2018 to recommend a 7-day regimen of amphotericin B deoxycholate (0.7–1.0 mg/kg/day) with flucytosine 100 mg/kg in four divided doses, followed by 7 days of high-dose fluconazole 1,200 mg/day as the preferred first-line induction therapy regimen (9). Two weeks of fluconazole (1,200 mg/day) plus flucytosine (100 mg/kg/day) or 2 weeks of amphotericin B deoxycholate (0.7–1.0 mg/kg/day) were acceptable alternatives if resources limit the availability of first-line therapy.

In 2022, Jarvis et al. published a phase 3, controlled, non-inferiority study in Botswana, Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe, that evaluated single-dose liposomal amphotericin B at 10 mg/kg in combination with flucytosine and fluconazole compared to the then-WHO-recommended first-line induction regimen of 1 week of amphotericin B deoxycholate plus flucytosine, followed by high dose fluconazole for 1 week (28). This study added single-dose liposomal amphotericin to the all-oral regimen, which had been found to be non-inferior to standard 2-week amphotericin (28). This was done in order to ensure that adequate therapy was being delivered even if single-dose amphotericin was ineffective and that flucytosine was not being used in the absence of a partner drug, since monotherapy is likely to induce resistance (69). They found that the single-dose liposomal amphotericin regimen had a 10-week mortality rate of 24.8% compared to 28.7% in the control group, which was statistically non-inferior (Fig. 4). The single-dose amphotericin group had a lower rate of grade 3 or 4 adverse events compared to the control group.

Following the evidence to support single-dose liposomal amphotericin, the WHO again updated the treatment guidelines in 2022 (10). The 2022 WHO guidelines recommended single-dose liposomal amphotericin B 10 mg/kg with flucytosine 100 mg/kg/day and fluconazole 1,200 mg/day for 14 days as the preferred first-line induction therapy where liposomal amphotericin is available (Fig. 5). US Health and Human Services Guidelines also recommend single-dose liposomal amphotericin as a co-equal first-line regimen along with traditional daily liposomal amphotericin with flucytosine for 14 days (15). However, despite these promising results, the Infectious Disease Society of America, the British HIV Association, and the European AIDS Clinical Society still recommend 14 days of liposomal amphotericin plus flucytosine, a regimen that has never been tested in rigorous clinical trials (15, 52, 70, 71). This regimen has been settled upon in high-income countries given the development of liposomal amphotericin, which is less toxic, based on the assumption that fungicidal activity will be equivalent between liposomal and deoxycholate amphotericin (69). However, in the only trial that compared liposomal and deoxycholate amphotericin, Hamill et al. compared liposomal versus deoxycholate amphotericin monotherapy and found that CSF sterility at 10 weeks was 60% in the commonly recommended dose of 3 mg/kg liposomal amphotericin compared to 79% in the deoxycholate amphotericin group (72). In addition, the AMBITION trial demonstrated a 77% culture sterility at 2 weeks (28, 69). Experts have suggested that the high initial dose of liposomal amphotericin may result in improved fungicidal effects compared to the daily dosing regimen (69). For these reasons, single-dose liposomal amphotericin is likely to be at least as fungicidal as the standard 14-day course with clear benefits in toxicity profile. Thus, we would recommend that single-dose liposomal amphotericin regimens should be preferred in low- and high-income settings when treating cryptococcal meningitis in people with HIV.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

2022 WHO antifungal treatment recommendations for cryptococcal meningitis. Single-dose liposomal amphotericin is preferred when available; otherwise, amphotericin B deoxycholate for 7 days is an acceptable alternative. Therapeutic lumbar punctures and electrolyte supplementation are critical during the first 2-week period.

There have been numerous studies of alternative adjunctive therapies for cryptococcal meningitis, including interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), sertraline, tamoxifen, and dexamethasone, each found to have varying clinical utility. IFN-γ is an essential component of the host CD4+ T-cell helper response to intracellular pathogens including Cryptococcus spp. IFN-γ secreted by type-1 helper T-cells directs the immune response to more effectively target and clear Cryptococcus. Jarvis et al. evaluated the associations of cryptococcal-specific CD4+ T-cell responses to various clinical outcomes and found that individuals with a predominantly IFN-γ response had a lower mortality rate compared to those with a more blunted response (73). In a small trial, they found that adding IFN-γ to the standard induction treatment regimen increased the rate of cryptococcal clearance from the CSF, but did not reduce the mortality rate – in a trial not powered for mortality (22). While these data are promising and merit further study, a better understanding of the host response during cryptococcal disease progression is needed to determine the appropriate targets and timing to intervene.

Sertraline, the most commonly prescribed antidepressant with good neurotropic effects, is also fungicidal against naturally occurring Cryptococcal isolates in vitro (67). In mouse models, sertraline alone or with fluconazole reduced the burden of Cryptococcus in the brain, kidney, and spleen (68). However, a phase 3 clinical trial in Uganda evaluating the use of adjunctive sertraline compared to the standard of care found no significant differences in the rate of fungal clearance or 18-week mortality between the two groups (25).

Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor antagonist, commonly prescribed for breast cancer is a widely available, affordable medication that has also shown promise as a therapy for cryptococcal infection. Tamoxifen was found to have an in vitro median minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 4 mg/L, which is comparable to flucytosine or fluconazole (68, 74, 75). However, in a small open-label phase 2 trial, the addition of tamoxifen to standard of care (amphotericin + fluconazole) did not improve the rate of fungal clearance as compared to standard of care alone (76).

Dexamethasone is a beneficial therapy in tuberculous and pneumococcal meningitis (77, 78). Given the complex interplay of inflammation and fungal burden in cryptococcal meningitis, dexamethasone was thought to possibly be a beneficial adjunctive therapy. Beardsley et al. conducted a multisite randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the addition of dexamethasone for 6 weeks to the standard of care (79). The addition of dexamethasone to the standard of care for cryptococcal meningitis did not lead to a reduction in 10-week mortality (dexamethasone group 47% vs 41% placebo group; P = 0.45). In addition, the trial was stopped early for safety concerns as clinical adverse events were more common in the dexamethasone group (667 vs 494 total events), including an increased incidence of grade 3 or 4 infections, renal, and cardiac events (79). Furthermore, the EFA or rate of CSF fungal clearance was significantly lower in the dexamethasone group (0.21 vs 0.31 log10 CFU/mL/day). As we have discussed, this is associated with poorer mortality related to cryptococcosis (79). The findings from this trial emphasize the need to understand the host immune response during cryptococcal infection, such that an intervention is precisely timed on the damage-response framework (80, 81).

Consolidation antifungal therapy

The consolidation and maintenance phases of therapy are designed to continue clearance of Cryptococcus and prevent recurrence until there has been ART-related immune restoration. The consolidation phase of therapy typically starts 2 weeks after the start of induction therapy but can be altered depending on the individual’s rate of fungal clearance during the induction phase. Despite appropriate induction therapy, a subset of individuals will not have achieved CSF sterility by 2 weeks (6). In a study in Uganda and South Africa, 43% of individuals were CSF culture positive after 2 weeks of induction therapy (82). However, it is important to note that the induction regimen evaluated in this study was deoxycholate amphotericin B (0.7–1 mg/kg/day) plus fluconazole (800 mg/day) for 14 days, which has been since been shown to be a sub-standard regimen. Given the high percentage of positive CSF cultures at 2 weeks, a higher dose of fluconazole (800 mg/day) was used as an enhanced consolidation regimen for 3 weeks or until CSF sterility was achieved (82). Thus, fluconazole 800 mg/day for the duration of the consolidation period has become the standard recommendation. While itraconazole can be used as an alternative in rare clinical scenarios, it is less efficacious compared to fluconazole due to its limited CNS penetration (83, 84). Voriconazole achieves good CNS levels, has excellent in vitro and in vivo activity against Cryptococcus and has been shown to have good clinical efficacy (85). However, these data primarily evaluated immunocompetent individuals and have limited generalizability for most people affected by Cryptococcus. There are no established breakpoints for fluconazole or other drugs against Cryptococcus and the clinical relevance of MIC is yet to be determined (8688). Thus, MIC should not be used to routinely guide clinical decisions, except in cryptococcal relapse as discussed below.

Maintenance antifungal therapy

Individuals with advanced HIV disease are at risk of recurrent cryptococcal meningitis until immune function is restored. Following the completion of consolidation therapy, the WHO recommends fluconazole 200 mg/day (10). This should be continued for at least 1 year until the person is stable on ART, has a CD4 count >100 cells/µL and sustained HIV viral suppression or a CD4 count >200 cells/µL in case no HIV viral load monitoring is available. In the event that an individual has immunological failure underlined by interruption of ART or CD4 count falls below 100 cells/µL, fluconazole maintenance therapy should be resumed. These recommendations stem from a major study in 1991, which observed high rates of cryptococcal relapse when maintenance therapy was discontinued early (89). In a placebo-controlled double-blind study comparing fluconazole maintenance therapy to placebo, the placebo group had a 37% recurrence rate compared to 3% in the fluconazole group (89). The use of weekly amphotericin or daily itraconazole for maintenance therapy is not as efficacious as fluconazole in preventing cryptococcal meningitis relapse (90, 91).

Management of intracranial pressure

While pharmacological interventions are essential, equally important in the treatment of acute cryptococcal meningitis is the prompt management of elevated ICP. Approximately 50–75% of individuals present with elevated ICP, defined as CSF opening pressures >20 cmH2O (5, 92, 93). The ICP should be measured on the initial diagnostic lumbar puncture and those with an initial pressure >20 cmH2O should proceed with therapeutic CSF drainage on the same lumbar puncture. The goal is to reduce the ICP to <20 cmH2O (10). Some guidelines recommend to only reduce by 50% on the initial lumbar puncture in cases of extreme elevation (10, 52); however, extensive clinical experience and several studies have demonstrated a survival benefit when reducing ICP to <20 cmH2O (93, 94). Repeat lumbar puncture should be done daily for those with elevated ICP on opening pressure until it is normalized. Clinical symptoms of elevated ICP include headache, nausea, vomiting, confusion, papilledema, and visual acuity loss (95). Individuals with severely elevated opening pressure (>35 cmH2O) have higher mortality even after receiving repeat lumbar punctures (93). Because of this, individuals with severely elevated ICP despite appropriate management after 1 week should be considered for ventricular or lumbar drain placement. The use of pharmacotherapeutics such as mannitol, acetazolamide, or corticosteroids to lower ICP is not recommended and may even cause harm (96, 97). The initial lumbar puncture is often done under emergent conditions and opening pressure is not measured. Lack of initial opening pressure is associated with fewer lumbar punctures during cryptococcal management and worse outcomes (11, 82, 94). Thus, we recommend a repeat lumbar puncture be done within 24 h to measure opening pressure if not measured on the initial lumbar puncture. In addition, individuals with normal ICP on the initial lumbar puncture generally get fewer lumbar punctures over the course of treatment. In a study in Uganda, 30-day mortality for persons with an initial opening pressure of <20 cmH2O was similar to those with an opening pressure of >35 cmH2O (93). Therefore, we also recommend that persons with normal initial opening pressure have a repeat lumbar puncture within the first week of therapy, regardless of symptoms as there is a survival benefit associated with therapeutic lumbar punctures (Fig. 6) (94). Among those with a baseline CSF opening pressure of <25 cm H2O who received a second lumbar puncture, the ~10-day mortality was 0% (0/21) versus 16% (11/77) mortality for those who survived >24 h and did not receive a second lumbar puncture (94).

Fig 6.

Fig 6

Cumulative survival in Ugandan and South African individuals with cryptococcal meningitis who did or did not receive a therapeutic lumbar puncture. The adjusted relative risk of mortality in those who received a therapeutic lumbar puncture was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.12–0.82), implying a 69% relative risk of mortality reduction with a lumbar puncture conducted in the first week (94). The median time to the second lumbar puncture was ~2 days (IQR: 1–4). (Based on data from reference 87.)

Management of amphotericin-related toxicities

In the past few years, studies discussed in this review by Molloy et al. and Jarvis et al. have greatly improved the induction therapy regimen to limit the side effects of amphotericin B (27, 28). Both the single-dose liposomal amphotericin B and the 7-day amphotericin B deoxycholate regimens are better tolerated than the 14-day amphotericin deoxycholate course. However, management of amphotericin B-related toxicities remains a crucial factor in the appropriate management of cryptococcal meningitis. In a regional referral hospital in Uganda, universal, standardized amphotericin management improved 14-day survival (98). Unfortunately, the cost of monitoring, which requires regular renal function tests and full blood counts, and the nursing staff for safe administration of amphotericin with pre- and post-load fluids can be difficult in resource-limited settings.

Toxicities related to amphotericin B include infusion-related reactions (local or systemic), renal impairment, anemia, and electrolyte abnormalities, especially hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia (98100). The 2022 WHO treatment guidelines outline a detailed approach to laboratory monitoring, electrolyte and blood product repletion and management of infusion-related reactions (10). In general, peripheral IV lines should be routinely flushed and rotated to prevent phlebitis. Persons should be given pre- and post-infusion fluids, supplemented with potassium, if reasonable in the clinical situation. This is routine for single-dose or daily dose infusion of liposomal or deoxycholate formulations of amphotericin B. Individuals receiving single-dose liposomal amphotericin B should receive supplementation of potassium chloride and magnesium or close monitoring for the first 3 days (10, 28). For those receiving 7 days of amphotericin, potassium and magnesium should be supplemented or closely monitored daily, while those receiving 14 days of amphotericin may need supplementation for up to 3 days after treatment completion (10). Electrolyte, renal function, and hemoglobin monitoring are essential throughout treatment in order to tailor supplementation to the individual needs of each person. Close monitoring for infusion-related reactions, phlebitis and secondary skin infections are also crucial to ensure rapid intervention.

Acute kidney injury and anemia are more common with cumulative doses of amphotericin B (27, 100). In the event of renal injury, doses of amphotericin B may be held or adjusted and additional fluids can be delivered (10, 98). Red blood cell transfusions are critical and potentially lifesaving for people with significant anemia and should be given to all those with a hemoglobin <7 g/dL or with symptomatic anemia. If red blood cell transfusions are not available, or significant renal toxicity develops the benefits of continued amphotericin beyond 7 days do not outweigh the risks of worsening toxicity (27, 101).

Management of other treatment-related toxicities

While the management of amphotericin B toxicities is the most intensive and difficult, especially in resource-limited settings, other treatment-related toxicities are also important to keep in mind. Flucytosine can cause significant bone marrow suppression including anemia and leukopenia as well as hepatic impairment (102, 103). Laboratory monitoring can follow the same approach as that for amphotericin described above with the addition of liver function monitoring. People with underlying hematologic disorders or who have received radiation or myelosuppressive medications are at higher risk of bone marrow suppression, and should be monitored more closely (102). In the event significant and sustained leukopenia occurs, decreased doses or switching to fluconazole should be considered; however, there is limited evidence to guide these decisions.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of flucytosine can be useful in managing and preventing toxicities, when available (104). Higher peak concentrations of flucytosine have been linked to worsened myelotoxicity and hepatotoxicity (104, 105). In one clinical trial, serum flucytosine levels > 100 µg/mL were significantly associated with higher rates of toxicity (105). Monitoring can also be useful in trying to minimize the development of resistance, which has been shown to develop in Candida when exposed to lower concentrations lower concentrations of flucytosine (106). Thus therapeutic monitoring to ensure peak levels <100 µg/mL and troughs >20–40 µg/mL can be considered, when available (104). It is also essential to adjust flucytosine dosing levels based on creatinine clearance (CrCl), especially if therapeutic monitoring is unavailable. In general, no adjustment is needed for CrCl >40 mL/min, but the dose should be reduced by 50% for every 50% reduction in CrCl <40 mL/min (15, 52).

Fluconazole and voriconazole may be used as alternative agents during induction therapy or during consolidation and maintenance phases. Fluconazole, even at high doses used during induction therapy, is relatively safe compared to the other therapies discussed. However, hepatotoxicity and increased serum transaminases can rarely occur and should be routinely monitored (107). Hepatotoxicity is a greater concern in voriconazole as the frequency of occurrence is more common (107). Fluconazole and voriconazole are both associated with prolonged QT and cardiac arrhythmias (108). Voriconazole is associated with visual disturbances and hallucinations (109, 110). Dose reduction or switching to an alternative agent is usually effective in resolving these adverse events (108).

Identifying novel antifungal therapeutics

While the addition of single-dose liposomal amphotericin to the regimen for induction therapy of cryptococcal meningitis is the first major innovation in many years, there are multiple clinical trials investigating novel approaches to cryptococcal meningitis management. There is an ongoing trial using preemptive treatment with single-dose liposomal amphotericin B of CrAg-positive persons, which aims to improve the efficacy of screening and treatment of persons with asymptomatic cryptococcal meningitis. A second trial is investigating adjunctive flucytosine added to fluconazole for asymptomatic CrAg-positive persons.

Novel therapeutics include an orally bioavailable formulation of amphotericin B (111). This innovative formulation uses a lipid nanocrystal (LNC) to encase the amphotericin B to be orally bioavailable and delivered to monocytes and macrophages (111, 112). In mouse models, the experimental oral amphotericin with flucytosine was found to be equally efficacious compared to the intravenous formulation with flucytosine (112). LNC-amphotericin B has the potential to be used in lieu of intravenous amphotericin for induction therapy, with the goal of maintaining efficacy and improving the safety profile even further (113). The phase 1 trial for oral amphotericin B showed a promising safety profile (111). When given in four to six divided doses up to 2.0 g/day, 95% of participants completed all doses without grade 3 or worse adverse events (111). In a qualitative survey of participants, 96% preferred their experience with oral amphotericin compared to previous IV amphotericin (111). The phase 2 trial was recently completed and enrolled a total of 80 participants to receive LNC-amphotericin B (40 received two loading doses of IV amphotericin B and 40 received all oral LNC-amphotericin B) and 41 control participants received IV amphotericin B and flucytosine (114). They found a similar EFA amongst all groups with 0.41 log10 Cryptococcus CFU/mL/day for the all-oral LNC-amphotericin B group, 0.42 log10 Cryptococcus CFU/mL/day for the oral LNC-amphotericin B with IV loading dose, and 0.46 log10 Cryptococcus CFU/mL/day for the control group (114). The 18-week survival was 85% for the all-oral LNC-amphotericin B group, 90% for the oral amphotericin B with IV loading dose and 85% for the control group (114). Grades 3–4 adverse events occurred in 41% of participants for the oral LNC-amphotericin B groups and 61% in the control group (P = 0.05) (114). This trial provides promising evidence for this novel oral amphotericin B and phase 3 trials are being planned.

Multiple promising potential compounds are in pre-clinical development as of 2023 but have yet to enter human phase 1 trials (115). Some of these include the repurposing of old drugs, such as the antihelminthic benzimidazoles or the antibacterial macrolide antibiotics. The benzimidazole, fenbendazole has in vitro activity against C. neoformans and C. gattii and similar findings were shown in a mouse model. This drug was found to reduce growth, macrophage inhibition, and reduced animal mortality related to cryptococcosis similar to amphotericin B (116). Macrolides were shown to reduce capsule formation of C. gattii in vitro which may promote the innate immune response (117). Clofazamine, a broad-spectrum antifungal and antimycobacterial agent, has also been shown to work synergistically with other antifungals by inducing cell membrane stress (115). Even more novel approaches have identified new compounds and monoclonal antibodies to target various essential components of the Cryptococcus cell wall or metabolism. The monoclonal antibody 18B7 has been identified in mouse models and binds to a cryptococcal polysaccharide that enhances antifungal immune system activity by activating the complement pathway (118). A novel agent called APX001 is an N-phosphonoxymethyl prodrug that is completely metabolized to an active agent by systemic alkaline phosphatases. APX001 targets a fungal enzyme that is essential in the localization of cell wall mannoproteins and thus fungal cell wall integrity (119). It has in vitro and in vivo activity that reduces the cryptococcal fungal burden comparable to currently used therapies (119). Finally, lenalidomide is a TNF-α inhibitor that is already in use as an anti-neoplastic agent and is being considered as an immunomodulatory agent that may improve outcomes in cryptococcal meningitis (120). A recent small interventional study, conducted on 14 people with HIV and cryptococcal meningitis, was given lenalidomide after successful induction therapy for cryptococcal meningitis. Eleven of the 14 participants completed follow-up, of whom all had sustained clinical remission and rapid resolution of symptoms by week 4 of follow-up. However, there was no control group or comparison making it difficult to determine whether lenalidomide was essential in the outcomes of these participants. While these compounds demonstrate varying degrees of promise, all are yet to enter into human clinical trials and would not be recommended for therapeutic use at this time.

TIMING OF ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY INITIATION

In general, immune restoration with early ART initiation has been the preferred strategy in the management of HIV/AIDS-related opportunistic infections. This has been shown in large clinical trials to improve mortality (121). However, in cryptococcal meningitis, the general approach to timing of ART initiation is not nearly as clear. Determining the optimal time for ART initiation involves balancing the survival benefit of reconstituting the immune system against the risk of paradoxical cryptococcal IRIS. Paradoxical cryptococcal IRIS is defined as the worsening or recurrence of cryptococcal symptoms in the same or new anatomic sites after successful cryptococcal therapy and ART initiation (6, 122, 123). This occurs in up to one third of persons treated for cryptococcal meningitis and has a mortality rate of up to 36% (122, 124).

In two small clinical trials, early ART initiation was demonstrated to result in an increased incidence of paradoxical cryptococcal IRIS and an overall increase in mortality (125, 126). Boulware et al. completed a landmark Cryptococcal Optimal ART Timing (COAT) trial in Uganda and South Africa to better understand how best to optimize the timing of ART initiation while balancing these risks (65). The trial randomized individuals with cryptococcal meningitis to initiate ART 1–2 weeks versus 4–6 weeks after starting antifungal therapy. They found that those with a delayed ART initiation had a ~15% lower 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year mortality compared to the earlier ART initiation group (65). In this trial, no persons were lost to follow-up through 1 year. In 2023, publication of a smaller case-control study from pooled cohorts in high-income countries demonstrated the absence of an increased mortality risk when starting ART immediately (127). In this case-control study, 69% of participants with cryptococcal meningitis were either lost within 30 days or excluded from analysis, which fundamentally casts doubts on the validity of the analysis (128). International guidelines and cryptococcal experts continue to recommend ART initiation at approximately 4–6 weeks after initial antifungal treatment.

SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES

Cryptococcus gattii infection

Cryptococcus gattii is a separate species from the more commonly recognized C. neoformans infection that we have been discussing thus far. It causes a similar clinical syndrome to C. neoformans with meningitis being the predominant and most severe form of the disease, especially in those who are infected with HIV (129). Mortality rates in people infected with HIV are comparable to cases of C. neoformans infections and have been recorded up to 36% in a South African hospital and no different than meningitis due to C. neoformans in a hospital in Botswana (129, 130). However, C. gattii infections occur more commonly in immunocompetent people (131, 132). While C. gattii has been noted to be endemic in tropical and subtropical regions of the world, recent decades have seen its emergence in British Columbia, Canada, and the Pacific Northwest region of the United States (133136).

Treatment of C. gatii infections is generally extrapolated from data on C. neoformans and expert opinion as there are no robust clinical trials evaluating the most appropriate treatment regimen. For treatment of meningitis due to C. gattii, the IDSA guidelines recommend following the same induction, consolidative, and suppressive regimens as that used for C. neoformans (52). Cryptococcomas and hydrocephalus, which are more common in C. gattii should be monitored more closely with diagnostic imaging and follow-up (52). Others have suggested a more prolonged course of induction therapy of up to 6 weeks depending on the individual clinical circumstances (137). In a cohort of Australian patients, 88% received amphotericin B and 78% received flucytosine for a median of 6 weeks (137). This group had a similar mortality but improved clinical response at 12-month follow-up compared to those who received alternative regimens (137). Serial lumbar punctures to manage elevated intracranial pressures remain a cornerstone of treatment for C. gattii neurologic infections (138).

Cryptococcal meningitis during pregnancy

High-dose fluconazole and flucytosine are both potentially teratogenic compounds, making the therapy of cryptococcal meningitis particularly challenging during pregnancy. In a 2011 safety announcement, the FDA classified fluconazole at doses over 400 mg/day as category D, which indicates positive evidence of human fetal risk (139). Flucytosine is considered category C, which indicates evidence exists in animal studies of teratogenicity, but there is insufficient human data to determine the risk (140). Amphotericin B, on the other hand, is considered category B, which indicates that no risk of teratogenicity has been observed in animal or human data (140). In a large Danish cohort involving more than 8,000 pregnancies exposed to fluconazole and over 968,000 non-exposed pregnancies, doses of fluconazole ranging from 150 to 300 mg were generally safe in all stages of pregnancy (141). There was three times increased odds of tetralogy of Fallot; however, this still only occurred in 0.1% of exposed pregnancies (141). The risks and benefits of antifungal therapy and under-treated cryptococcosis need to be weighed on an individual person level.

With any critical illness, maternal mortality and fetal demise are unfortunately common, thus low absolute risks of teratogenicity need to be put in the context of a highly lethal infection. Pastick et al. described the largest case series to date of 12 cases of cryptococcosis during pregnancy or the postpartum period (142). The maternal meningitis survival rate at hospital discharge was 75% (9/12) with amphotericin B induction monotherapy, and neonatal/fetal survival rate was 44% (4/9) among the mothers who survived (142). In general, induction therapy with amphotericin and flucytosine should be completed regardless of the trimester. Consolidation therapy during the first trimester can be continued with weekly amphotericin B. In the second or third trimesters of pregnancy, the benefit of fluconazole used as consolidation therapy at 400 mg/day doses generally outweigh the risks (142). Given the risk of recurrent cryptococcal meningitis in those not treated with fluconazole, the benefit of fluconazole doses of 200 mg/day for maintenance therapy likely outweighs the risks in all stages of pregnancy. For pregnant women detected with subclinical cryptococcal antigenemia, we recommend a customized approach. Those with low plasma CrAg LFA titers of ≤1:80, we recommend fluconazole 200 mg/day for 4 weeks with immediate ART-initiation. For those with moderate titers of 1:160 to 1:320, we recommend a 10-week fluconazole duration. For those with plasma CrAg LFA titers ≥1:640, we recommend excluding meningitis and giving liposomal amphotericin 10 mg/kg once with fluconazole 200 mg/day for 10 weeks. This strategy is currently being validated in clinical trials.

Cryptococcal meningitis relapse

Individuals who have symptoms of cryptococcal meningitis after appropriate management and initial improvement must be distinguished from five clinical entities: (i) persistent cryptococcal meningitis inadequately initially treated; (ii) culture-positive microbiological relapse; (iii) paradoxical IRIS; (iv) complications of persistent elevated intracranial pressure in the absence of inflammation or relapse; and (v) different CNS infection. Persistent cryptococcal meningitis applies to those whose CSF culture remains positive during the course of treatment while relapse occurs in those who had sterile CSF and subsequent culture-positive CSF. Paradoxical IRIS occurs in those who have a recurrence of cryptococcal symptoms, typically accompanied with increased CSF pleocytosis without positive CSF culture. Persistent infection is generally defined as positive CSF culture beyond 4 weeks of appropriate therapy and is managed similarly to relapse infection (52).

Early studies of cryptococcal meningitis relapse in New York demonstrated that the strain of Cryptococcus responsible for disease relapse was the same strain during primary cryptococcal infection rather than a reinfection with a new strain (143). The serial isolates were not found to have increased antimicrobial resistance (144); however, resistance is possible. Similar findings were demonstrated in Uganda, using the same genetic typing techniques, individuals with serial positive CSF cryptococcal cultures had identical sequential isolates and low rates of fluconazole resistance (137, 145). Still, if fluconazole monotherapy is used for the induction regimen, fluconazole resistance has been shown to be as high as 76% in one study that defined resistance as fluconazole MIC ≥64 µg/mL (146). Relapse isolates should have fluconazole susceptibility profiles checked. Treatment-emergent resistance to amphotericin B is rare.

Individuals presenting with symptoms of cryptococcal meningitis relapse or persistent infection beyond 4 weeks of therapy should first be evaluated for appropriate therapeutic regimen and adherence to fluconazole during the consolidation and maintenance phases (10). Lumbar puncture should be performed to assess for elevated opening pressure, obtain cryptococcal cultures (which should be incubated for at least 2 weeks), and to rule out concomitant infections. In those with positive cryptococcal cultures, induction therapy should be re-initiated. The consolidation and maintenance phases should use a higher dose of fluconazole (e.g., 1,200 mg/day), if tolerated. If antifungal susceptibility testing is available, fluconazole resistance testing should be done. Itraconazole, voriconazole, or weekly amphotericin B can be considered for salvage therapy for consolidation and maintenance phases in those with fluconazole resistance.

This testing can be time and resource-intensive as the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommends broth microdilution to determine the MIC (68). MIC testing for fungal infections has been shown to poorly correlate with clinical outcomes, following what is known as the “90–60 rule” (147). This rule states that infections due to susceptible isolates will respond to therapy ~90% of the time, while those due to resistant isolates will respond to therapy ~60% of the time (147). In addition, there are no established breakpoints by the CLSI or European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Neither CLSI nor EUCAST has established breakpoints for antifungals specifically in Cryptococcus (87, 88). These factors make interpreting MIC data in Cryptococcus very difficult. However, epidemiologic cutoff (ECOFF) values are often used to infer resistance to antifungals for Cryptococcus (148). ECOFF is determined by describing the typical MIC distribution for a population and identifying the value at which resistance mutations are likely to exist (148). ECOFFs do not predict clinical success but can be used to determine if specific isolates are likely to carry resistance. Given these complexities, we do not recommend routine antifungal susceptibility testing to guide therapy with the exception of relapse cases when fluconazole resistance may be playing an important role and alternative azole options are feasible.

Paradoxical immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome

Those with recurrence of cryptococcal symptoms despite appropriate therapy and initiation of ART, but negative CSF cultures are considered to have paradoxical IRIS. While there is a paucity of data to guide recommendations, management of elevated intracranial pressure is a critical aspect of cryptococcal IRIS (122, 123). Mild cases of IRIS, especially those with normal intracranial pressure usually improve without any specific interventions (52). The 2010 IDSA guidelines recommend those with severe IRIS including elevated ICP or neurological deterioration receive corticosteroids with 1 mg/kg/day of prednisone equivalent (52). Duration is dependent on clinical response, but generally the corticosteroids should be tapered over a 2-to-6-week period. Thalidomide, which is hypothesized to reduce TNF-alpha, was shown in a small case series to result in rapid clinical improvement in three cases of refractory, steroid-dependent cryptococcal IRIS (149). Anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies have also been used for refractory cases.

Unmasking disease

Unmasking cryptococcal disease is the phenomenon where asymptomatic or subclinical disease becomes manifest after the reconstitution of the immune system with ART (150). Unmasked cryptococcal meningitis is common in sub-Saharan Africa and is associated with higher mortality (151). In a large prospective cohort in Uganda, 46% of all persons presenting with cryptococcal meningitis were receiving ART at presentation with a median of 17 weeks since initiation (151). While overall mortality did not differ between ART-naive and ART-experienced groups, those who initiated ART within 14 days had a much higher 2-week mortality of 47% compared to 23% for those who initiated ART more than 14 days prior to diagnosis. Improving these poor outcomes is a primary goal of “test and treat” strategies discussed above.

Cerebral cryptococcoma

Cerebral cryptococcoma is a rare phenomenon of cryptococcosis that is characterized by localization of Cryptococcus in the brain parenchyma. Cryptococcomas may appear as a mass or ring-enhancing lesion on neuroimaging and can be confused with other pathogens such as toxoplasmosis or CNS tumor (52). Cryptococcomas are exceedingly rare in people living with HIV who are not receiving effective ART. However, cryptococcomas may present as an “unmasking” manifestation in persons with previously unrecognized disseminated cryptococcal infection who are started on ART without first receiving antifungal therapy. Failure to respond to antifungal therapy should prompt a biopsy of the lesion to rule out other causes. The therapeutic regimen consists of an extended induction regimen with amphotericin B and flucytosine for six weeks, followed by fluconazole for a consolidation and maintenance period of up to 18 months (52). Individuals with extensive surrounding edema should receive adjunctive corticosteroids. Large (≥3 cm), accessible lesions that cause mass effect should be referred for neurological intervention (52).

Symptomatic neurologic cryptococcal antigenemia

A subset of individuals with HIV-associated cryptococcal disease have cryptococcal antigenemia with meningitis symptoms, but CSF CrAg is negative (152). This presentation is on the continuum of cryptococcal disease progression from asymptomatic cryptococcal antigenemia to overt cryptococcal meningoencephalitis. Without evidence of CNS disease, management of these individuals with fluconazole monotherapy resulted in 32% mortality (152). Many individuals with CrAg antigenemia have hyponatremia, which is an independent risk factor for progression to meningitis and mortality (153). Combination antifungal therapy with single-dose liposomal amphotericin, followed by fluconazole and flucytosine is currently being investigated as a treatment option for individuals with cryptococcal antigenemia with or without symptoms of meningitis. Individuals with neurologic symptomatic cryptococcal antigenemia are likely to have early cryptococcal meningoencephalitis given that metagenomic next-generation sequencing detected Cryptococcus in some of these individuals (154).

CONCLUSION

Cryptococcal meningitis continues to be a leading cause of meningitis globally. It is also a significant cause of mortality in people with HIV and advanced HIV disease with a disproportionate burden of disease following on those in resource-limited countries. Prompt diagnosis and therapeutic intervention are essential to reducing the mortality associated with cryptococcosis. In addition, campaigns to screen at-risk populations with cryptococcal antigen testing can prevent progression to severe CNS disease and reduce mortality on a population scale.

Recent large, high-quality clinical trials have led to marked changes in our understanding of the optimal induction therapy. A shorter, 7-day course of deoxycholate amphotericin B is as effective as a 14-day course with improved safety outcomes; and a single high-dose of liposomal amphotericin B in combination with flucytosine and fluconazole is as effective as the 7-day course of deoxycholate amphotericin B and flucytosine. Flucytosine is a critical adjunctive therapy that has a survival benefit. Therapeutic lumbar punctures are an essential aspect of management and improve survival when implemented appropriately. We recommend therapeutic lumbar punctures on all persons with cryptococcal meningitis at days 3 and 7 of therapy, regardless of baseline opening pressure (93). Given the severe nature of IRIS in the central nervous system, delayed initiation of ART remains preferred, generally 4–6 weeks after antifungal therapy has been initiated. Relapse of cryptococcal meningitis or paradoxical IRIS cannot be clinically distinguished and requires lumbar punctures with CSF culture, with distinct approaches to management.

While there now exists a rich body of evidence to guide diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in managing cryptococcal meningitis, significant gaps in knowledge still exist. The best approach to screening is still under investigation as CrAg testing has greatly improved early diagnosis of cryptococcosis. However, all the regimens studied thus far have not shown a significant benefit in reducing cryptococcal-related mortality. A clinical trial evaluating single-dose amphotericin followed by fluconazole is underway in Uganda (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03945448). The optimal approach to therapeutic lumbar punctures is still not clear. While we present compelling evidence for multiple lumbar punctures to be performed, regardless of initial opening pressure, we are unable to suggest the best approach beyond this general recommendation. The AMBITION trial, which demonstrated the benefit of single-dose amphotericin B, has already revolutionized care of cryptococcosis in resource-limited settings. However, its use in high-income settings has been resisted. We discuss compelling reasons that this regimen is likely to be generalizable to these settings, as outlined by Harrison et al. (69). Further studies of this regimen in these settings are likely to improve its acceptability by practitioners. Finally, the new frontier of cryptococcal management is likely to be better understanding of the inflammatory response that is responsible for a significant amount of disease. Further immunological studies to describe the pathophysiology will improve our ability to identify new therapeutics.

Biographies

graphic file with name cmr.00156-22.f007.gif

Thomas McHale is an infectious disease doctor in his final year of fellowship training at the University of Minnesota. He completed internal medicine training at Montefiore Medical Center in the Bronx, New York during the COVID-19 pandemic. He has an interest in improving access to care for underserved populations and better understanding neglected diseases with a particular interest in spatial epidemiology, public health, and fungal infections. Since 2021 he has worked with a clinical trials team focusing on cryptococcal meningitis in Uganda and completed several projects to better understand the resistance profile and pharmacodynamics of flucytosine.

graphic file with name cmr.00156-22.f008.gif

David Boulware is an infectious disease physician-scientist and Professor of Medicine at the University of Minnesota. While he may best be known for the pioneering of remote, internet-based COVID-19 clinical trials on hydroxychloroquine testing post-exposure prophylaxis, early treatment, and pre-exposure prophylaxis, the actual focus of his research is meningitis in resource-limited areas including diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and quality improvement initiatives incorporating cost-effectiveness analyses in order to translate knowledge into improved care to impact guidelines. His collaborative team has particular interest in TB meningitis and in cryptococcal meningitis as Cryptococcus is the most common cause of adult meningitis in Sub-Saharan Africa causing 15-20% of AIDS-related mortality globally.

graphic file with name cmr.00156-22.f009.gif

John Kasibante is a research medical doctor and clinical immunologist at the Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University. He has four years of research experience in HIV-associated meningitis clinical trials in Uganda. Among the groundbreaking clinical trials he has worked on is the AMBITION-cm clinical trial. This trial provided evidence of the efficacy of single-dose amphotericin B for the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis which has since been adopted for the updated 2022 World Health Organisation cryptococcal meningitis treatment guidelines. He has also worked on EnACT clinical trial, the first oral amphotericin B clinical trial for the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in sub-Saharan Africa. He has extensive research experience in managing tuberculous meningitis and has worked on two tuberculous meningitis clinical trials. Dr Kasibante conducts translational laboratory research describing cellular and cytokine immunophenotypes and antibody repertoires in HIV-associated meningitis and how these parameters are applicable for diagnosis, prognosis, and immunotherapy targeting.

graphic file with name cmr.00156-22.f010.gif

Kenneth Ssebambulidde serves as a medical officer at the Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, and holds a visiting Postdoctoral fellowship in the Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology of the National Institute Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the U.S. National Institutes of Health. He is a valued member of a collaborative team dedicated to conducting clinical trials focused on HIV-associated cryptococcal, and tuberculosis meningitis based in Uganda. These clinical trials have yielded crucial insights into the prevention, screening, and management of advanced HIV disease-associated meningitis. His special interests are immunological mechanisms underlying diseases particularly the intricate connections between communicable and non-communicable central nervous system disorders.

graphic file with name cmr.00156-22.f011.gif

Caleb Skipper is an infectious diseases doctor with an assistant professor position at the University of Minnesota, focusing on an academic clinical research tract. He is interested in improving healthcare in resource limited settings through impactful clinical research focused on infectious diseases, particularly those related to HIV/AIDS. He is currently working toward developing a diverse skillset that will build the foundation needed to be a successful independent researcher in global health. His specific focuses are on the impact of viral co-infections on persons with advanced HIV and concomitant opportunistic infections, and designing clinical trials that are feasible and relevant in sub-Saharan Africa.

graphic file with name cmr.00156-22.f012.gif

Mahsa Abassi is an infectious disease doctor and assistant professor at the University of Minnesota. Her research focuses on HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis with a particular interest in understanding the pathophysiology of neurological impairment. In 2018, she won the Peter G. Pappas Young Investigators Award. She has extensive experience working on clinical trials in Uganda and her future work will look at targeting neuropathogenesis of altered mental status to improve survival in cryptococcal meningitis.

Contributor Information

Thomas C. McHale, Email: mchal053@umn.edu.

Graeme N. Forrest, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois, USA

REFERENCES

  • 1. Ellis J, Bangdiwala AS, Cresswell FV, Rhein J, Nuwagira E, Ssebambulidde K, Tugume L, Rajasingham R, Bridge SC, Muzoora C, Meya DB, Boulware DR. 2019. The changing epidemiology of HIV-associated adult meningitis, Uganda 2015-2017. Open Forum Infect Dis 6:ofz506. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Rajasingham R, Govender NP, Jordan A, Loyse A, Shroufi A, Denning DW, Meya DB, Chiller TM, Boulware DR. 2022. The global burden of HIV-associated cryptococcal infection in adults in 2020: a modelling analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 22:1748–1755. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00499-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rajasingham R, Smith RM, Park BJ, Jarvis JN, Govender NP, Chiller TM, Denning DW, Loyse A, Boulware DR. 2017. Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: an updated analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 17:873–881. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30243-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Rajasingham R, Boulware DR. 2020. Cryptococcal antigen screening and preemptive treatment-how can we improve survival? Clin Infect Dis 70:1691–1694. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Jarvis JN, Bicanic T, Loyse A, Namarika D, Jackson A, Nussbaum JC, Longley N, Muzoora C, Phulusa J, Taseera K, Kanyembe C, Wilson D, Hosseinipour MC, Brouwer AE, Limmathurotsakul D, White N, van der Horst C, Wood R, Meintjes G, Bradley J, Jaffar S, Harrison T. 2014. Determinants of mortality in a combined cohort of 501 patients with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: implications for improving outcomes. Clin Infect Dis 58:736–745. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kambugu A, Meya DB, Rhein J, O’Brien M, Janoff EN, Ronald AR, Kamya MR, Mayanja-Kizza H, Sande MA, Bohjanen PR, Boulware DR. 2008. Outcomes of cryptococcal meningitis in Uganda before and after the availability of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis 46:1694–1701. doi: 10.1086/587667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hevey MA, Presti RM, OʼHalloran JA, Larson L, Raval K, Powderly WG, Spec A. 2019. Mortality after cryptococcal infection in the modern antiretroviral therapy era. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 82:81–87. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Carlson RD, Rolfes MA, Birkenkamp KE, Nakasujja N, Rajasingham R, Meya DB, Boulware DR. 2014. Predictors of neurocognitive outcomes on antiretroviral therapy after cryptococcal meningitis: a prospective cohort study. Metab Brain Dis 29:269–279. doi: 10.1007/s11011-013-9476-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. World Helath Organization . 2018. Guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention and management of cryptococcal disease in HIV-infected adults, adolescents and children. WHO. Geneva. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550277. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. World Health Organization . 2022. Guidelines for diagnosing, preventing and managing cryptococcal disease among adults, adolescents and children living with HIV. World Health Organization. Geneva. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/357088. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Graybill JR, Sobel J, Saag M, van der Horst C, Powderly W, Cloud G, Riser L, Hamill R, Dismukes W, NIAID Mycoses Study Group and AIDS Cooperative Treatment Groups . 2000. Diagnosis and management of increased intracranial pressure in patients with AIDS and cryptococcal meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 30:47–54. doi: 10.1086/313603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Brouwer AE, Rajanuwong A, Chierakul W, Griffin GE, Larsen RA, White NJ, Harrison TS. 2004. Combination antifungal therapies for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: a randomised trial. Lancet 363:1764–1767. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16301-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ssebambulidde K, Skipper C, Rhein J. 2019. Culture-negative cryptococcal meningitis. Lancet Infect Dis 19:929–930. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30442-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Boulware DR, Rolfes MA, Rajasingham R, von Hohenberg M, Qin Z, Taseera K, Schutz C, Kwizera R, Butler EK, Meintjes G, Muzoora C, Bischof JC, Meya DB. 2014. Multisite validation of cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay and quantification by laser thermal contrast. Emerg Infect Dis 20:45–53. doi: 10.3201/eid2001.130906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. NIH . 2021. Cryptococcosis. Available from: https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/en/guidelines/hiv-clinical-guidelines-adult-and-adolescent-opportunistic-infections/cryptococcosis. Retrieved 15 Apr 2023.
  • 16. Boulware DR, Meya DB, Bergemann TL, Wiesner DL, Rhein J, Musubire A, Lee SJ, Kambugu A, Janoff EN, Bohjanen PR. 2010. Clinical features and serum biomarkers in HIV immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome after cryptococcal meningitis: a prospective cohort study. PLoS Med 7:e1000384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Pullen MF, Hullsiek KH, Rhein J, Musubire AK, Tugume L, Nuwagira E, Abassi M, Ssebambulidde K, Mpoza E, Kiggundu R, Akampurira A, Nabeta HW, Schutz C, Evans EE, Rajasingham R, Skipper CP, Pastick KA, Williams DA, Morawski BM, Bangdiwala AS, Meintjes G, Muzoora C, Meya DB, Boulware DR. 2020. Cerebrospinal fluid early fungicidal activity as a surrogate endpoint for cryptococcal meningitis survival in clinical trials. Clin Infect Dis 71:e45–e49. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Dyal J, Akampurira A, Rhein J, Morawski BM, Kiggundu R, Nabeta HW, Musubire AK, Bahr NC, Williams DA, Bicanic T, Larsen RA, Meya DB, Boulware DR, ASTRO-CM Trial Team . 2016. Reproducibility of CSF quantitative culture methods for estimating rate of clearance in cryptococcal meningitis. Med Mycol 54:361–369. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myv104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Day JN, Chau TTH, Lalloo DG. 2013. Combination antifungal therapy for cryptococcal meningitis. N Engl J Med 368:2522–2523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1305981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Loyse A, Wilson D, Meintjes G, Jarvis JN, Bicanic T, Bishop L, Rebe K, Williams A, Jaffar S, Bekker L-G, Wood R, Harrison TS. 2012. Comparison of the early fungicidal activity of high-dose fluconazole, voriconazole, and flucytosine as second-line drugs given in combination with amphotericin B for the treatment of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 54:121–128. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Muzoora CK, Kabanda T, Ortu G, Ssentamu J, Hearn P, Mwesigye J, Longley N, Jarvis JN, Jaffar S, Harrison TS. 2012. Short course amphotericin B with high dose fluconazole for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis. J Infect 64:76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2011.10.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Jarvis JN, Meintjes G, Rebe K, Williams GN, Bicanic T, Williams A, Schutz C, Bekker L-G, Wood R, Harrison TS. 2012. Adjunctive interferon-γ immunotherapy for the treatment of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: a randomized controlled trial. AIDS 26:1105–1113. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283536a93 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Jackson AT, Nussbaum JC, Phulusa J, Namarika D, Chikasema M, Kanyemba C, Jarvis JN, Jaffar S, Hosseinipour MC, van der Horst C, Harrison TS. 2012. A phase II randomised controlled trial adding oral flucytosine to high dose fluconazole, with short-course amphotericin B, for cryptococcal meningitis. AIDS 26:1363–1370. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328354b419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Longley N, Muzoora C, Taseera K, Mwesigye J, Rwebembera J, Chakera A, Wall E, Andia I, Jaffar S, Harrison TS. 2008. Dose response effect of high-dose fluconazole for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis in southwestern Uganda. Clin Infect Dis 47:1556–1561. doi: 10.1086/593194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Rhein J, Morawski BM, Hullsiek KH, Nabeta HW, Kiggundu R, Tugume L, Musubire A, Akampurira A, Smith KD, Alhadab A, Williams DA, Abassi M, Bahr NC, Velamakanni SS, Fisher J, Nielsen K, Meya DB, Boulware DR, ASTRO-CM Study Team . 2016. Efficacy of adjunctive sertraline for the treatment of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: an open-label dose-ranging study. Lancet Infect Dis 16:809–818. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00074-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Nussbaum JC, Jackson A, Namarika D, Phulusa J, Kenala J, Kanyemba C, Jarvis JN, Jaffar S, Hosseinipour MC, Kamwendo D, van der Horst CM, Harrison TS. 2010. Combination flucytosine and high-dose fluconazole compared with fluconazole monotherapy for the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis: a randomized trial in Malawi. Clin Infect Dis 50:338–344. doi: 10.1086/649861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Molloy SF, Kanyama C, Heyderman RS, Loyse A, Kouanfack C, Chanda D, Mfinanga S, Temfack E, Lakhi S, Lesikari S, et al. 2018. Antifungal combinations for treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in Africa. N Engl J Med 378:1004–1017. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1710922 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Jarvis JN, Lawrence DS, Meya DB, Kagimu E, Kasibante J, Mpoza E, Rutakingirwa MK, Ssebambulidde K, Tugume L, Rhein J, et al. 2022. Single-dose liposomal amphotericin B treatment for cryptococcal meningitis. N Engl J Med 386:1109–1120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Snow RM, Dismukes WE. 1975. Cryptococcal meningitis: diagnostic value of cryptococcal antigen in cerebrospinal fluid. Arch Intern Med 135:1155–1157. doi: 10.1001/archinte.135.9.1155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Chabrol A, Doumbia A, Landman R, Fontanet A, Eholie SP, Niyongabo T, Nizigama L, Laureillard D, Sylla B, Menan H, Padoin C, Brun S, Alloui C, Gibowski S, Kakou A, Bouchaud O, Anrs Study Grp . 2017. High mortality despite high-dose oral fluconazole (1600 mg) and flucytosine, and serial lumbar punctures, for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: ANRS 12257 study in Burundi and Ivory coast. J Int AIDS Soc 20:91. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Binnicker MJ, Jespersen DJ, Bestrom JE, Rollins LO. 2012. Comparison of four assays for the detection of cryptococcal antigen. Clin Vaccine Immunol 19:1988–1990. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00446-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Jarvis JN, Percival A, Bauman S, Pelfrey J, Meintjes G, Williams GN, Longley N, Harrison TS, Kozel TR. 2011. Evaluation of a novel point-of-care cryptococcal antigen test on serum, plasma, and urine from patients with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 53:1019–1023. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Kwizera R, Omali D, Tadeo K, Kasibante J, Rutakingirwa MK, Kagimu E, Ssebambulidde K, Williams DA, Rhein J, Boulware D, Meya DB. 2021. Evaluation of the dynamiker cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay for the diagnosis of HIV-associated cryptococcosis. J Clin Microbiol 59:e02421-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02421-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Mpoza E, Mukaremera L, Kundura DA, Akampurira A, Luggya T, Tadeo KK, Pastick KA, Bridge SC, Tugume L, Kiggundu R, Musubire AK, Williams DA, Muzoora C, Nalintya E, Rajasingham R, Rhein J, Boulware DR, Meya DB, Abassi M. 2018. Evaluation of a point-of-care immunoassay test kit “StrongStep” for cryptococcal antigen detection. PLoS One 13:e0190652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Skipper C, Tadeo K, Martyn E, Nalintya E, Rajasingham R, Meya DB, Kafufu B, Rhein J, Boulware DR. 2020. Evaluation of serum cryptococcal antigen testing using two novel semiquantitative lateral flow assays in persons with cryptococcal antigenemia. J Clin Microbiol 58:e02046-19. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02046-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Williams DA, Kiiza T, Kwizera R, Kiggundu R, Velamakanni S, Meya DB, Rhein J, Boulware DR. 2015. Evaluation of fingerstick cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay in HIV-infected persons: a diagnostic accuracy study. Clin Infect Dis 61:464–467. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Lourens A, Jarvis JN, Meintjes G, Samuel CM. 2014. Rapid diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis by use of lateral flow assay on cerebrospinal fluid samples: influence of the high-dose “hook” effect. J Clin Microbiol 52:4172–4175. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01683-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Tadeo KK, Nimwesiga A, Kwizera R, Apeduno L, Martyn E, Okirwoth M, Nalintya E, Rajasingham R, Williams DA, Rhein J, Meya DB, Kafufu B, Boulware DR, Skipper CP. 2021. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of a semiquantitative cryptococcal antigen point-of-care assay among HIV-infected persons with cryptococcal meningitis. J Clin Microbiol 59:e0086021. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00860-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Brouwer AE, Teparrukkul P, Pinpraphaporn S, Larsen RA, Chierakul W, Peacock S, Day N, White NJ, Harrison TS. 2005. Baseline correlation and comparative kinetics of cerebrospinal fluid colony-forming unit counts and antigen titers in cryptococcal meningitis. J Infect Dis 192:681–684. doi: 10.1086/432073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kabanda T, Siedner MJ, Klausner JD, Muzoora C, Boulware DR. 2014. Point-of-care diagnosis and prognostication of cryptococcal meningitis with the cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay on cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Infect Dis 58:113–116. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Powderly WG, Cloud GA, Dismukes WE, Saag MS. 1994. Measurement of cryptococcal antigen in serum and cerebrospinal fluid: value in the management of AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 18:789–792. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.5.789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Antinori S, Ridolfo A, Fasan M, Magni C, Galimberti L, Milazzo L, Sollima S, Adorni F, Giuliani G, Galli M, Corbellino M, Parravicini C. 2009. AIDS-associated cryptococcosis: a comparison of epidemiology, clinical features and outcome in the pre- and post-HAART eras. Experience of a single centre in Italy. HIV Med 10:6–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2008.00645.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Liechty CA, Solberg P, Were W, Ekwaru JP, Ransom RL, Weidle PJ, Downing R, Coutinho A, Mermin J. 2007. Asymptomatic serum cryptococcal antigenemia and early mortality during antiretroviral therapy in rural Uganda. Trop Med Int Health 12:929–935. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01874.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Levin AE, Bangdiwala AS, Nalintya E, Kagimu E, Kasibante J, Rutakingirwa MK, Mpoza E, Jjunju S, Nuwagira E, Naluyima R, Kirumira P, Hou C, Ssebambulidde K, Musubire AK, Williams DA, Abassi M, Muzoora C, Hullsiek KH, Rajasingham R, Meya DB, Boulware DR, Skipper CP. 2023. Outpatient cryptococcal antigen screening is associated with favorable baseline characteristics and improved survival in persons with cryptococcal meningitis in Uganda. Clin Infect Dis 76:e759–e765. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Mfinanga S, Chanda D, Kivuyo SL, Guinness L, Bottomley C, Simms V, Chijoka C, Masasi A, Kimaro G, Ngowi B, Kahwa A, Mwaba P, Harrison TS, Egwaga S, Jaffar S, REMSTART trial team . 2015. Cryptococcal meningitis screening and community-based early adherence support in people with advanced HIV infection starting antiretroviral therapy in Tanzania and Zambia: an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 385:2173–2182. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60164-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Rhein J, Bahr NC, Morawski BM, Schutz C, Zhang Y, Finkelman M, Meya DB, Meintjes G, Boulware DR. 2014. Detection of high cerebrospinal fluid levels of (1→3)-β-d-glucan in cryptococcal meningitis. Open Forum Infect Dis 1:fu105. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofu105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Litvintseva AP, Lindsley MD, Gade L, Smith R, Chiller T, Lyons JL, Thakur KT, Zhang SX, Grgurich DE, Kerkering TM, Brandt ME, Park BJ. 2014. Utility of (1–3)-β-d-glucan testing for diagnostics and monitoring response to treatment during the multistate outbreak of fungal meningitis and other infections. Clin Infect Dis 58:622–630. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. U.S. Food and Drug Administration . 2021. Serological assays for the detection of beta-glucan - class II special controls guidance document for industry and FDA staff. FDA. [Google Scholar]
  • 49. MiraVista Diagnostics . 2023. Beta-D-glucan assay diagnostic test. MiraVista Diagn. Available from: https://miravistalabs.com/medical-fungal-infection-testing/antigen-detection/beta-d-glucan-test. Retrieved 7 Apr 2023. [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Rhein J, Bahr NC, Hemmert AC, Cloud JL, Bellamkonda S, Oswald C, Lo E, Nabeta H, Kiggundu R, Akampurira A, Musubire A, Williams DA, Meya DB, Boulware DR, ASTRO-CM Team . 2016. Diagnostic performance of a multiplex PCR assay for meningitis in an HIV-infected population in Uganda. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 84:268–273. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.11.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Van TT, Kim TH, Butler-Wu SM. 2020. Evaluation of the biofire filmarray meningitis/encephalitis assay for the detection of Cryptococcus neoformans/gattii. Clin Microbiol Infect 26:1375–1379. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Perfect JR, Dismukes WE, Dromer F, Goldman DL, Graybill JR, Hamill RJ, Harrison TS, Larsen RA, Lortholary O, Nguyen M-H, Pappas PG, Powderly WG, Singh N, Sobel JD, Sorrell TC. 2010. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis 50:291–322. doi: 10.1086/649858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Skipper C, Abassi M, Boulware DR. 2019. Diagnosis and management of central nervous system cryptococcal infections in HIV-infected adults. J Fungi (Basel) 5:65. doi: 10.3390/jof5030065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Tang L-M. 1990. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt in cryptococcal meningitis with hydrocephalus. Surg Neurol 33:314–319. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(90)90198-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Ford N, Shubber Z, Jarvis JN, Chiller T, Greene G, Migone C, Vitoria M, Doherty M, Meintjes G. 2018. CD4 cell count threshold for cryptococcal antigen screening of HIV-infected individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 66:S152–S159. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Wake RM, Govender NP, Omar T, Nel C, Mazanderani AH, Karat AS, Ismail NA, Tiemessen CT, Jarvis JN, Harrison TS. 2020. Cryptococcal-related mortality despite fluconazole preemptive treatment in a cryptococcal antigen screen-and-treat program. Clin Infect Dis 70:1683–1690. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Meya DB, Manabe YC, Castelnuovo B, Cook BA, Elbireer AM, Kambugu A, Kamya MR, Bohjanen PR, Boulware DR. 2010. Cost-effectiveness of serum cryptococcal antigen screening to prevent deaths among HIV-infected persons with a CD4+ cell count < or = 100 cells/microL who start HIV therapy in resource-limited settings. Clin Infect Dis 51:448–455. doi: 10.1086/655143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Meya DB, Kiragga AN, Nalintya E, Morawski BM, Rajasingham R, Park BJ, Mubiru A, Kaplan JE, Manabe YC, Boulware DR. 2019. Reflexive laboratory-based cryptococcal antigen screening and preemptive fluconazole therapy for cryptococcal antigenemia in HIV-infected individuals with CD4 <100 cells/µL: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 80:182–189. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Beyene T, Zewde AG, Balcha A, Hirpo B, Yitbarik T, Gebissa T, Rajasingham R, Boulware DR. 2017. Inadequacy of high-dose fluconazole monotherapy among cerebrospinal fluid cryptococcal antigen (CrAg)-positive human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons in an ethiopian crag screening program. Clin Infect Dis 65:2126–2129. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Faini D, Kalinjuma AV, Katende A, Mbwaji G, Mnzava D, Nyuri A, Glass TR, Furrer H, Hatz C, Boulware DR, Letang E. 2019. Laboratory-reflex cryptococcal antigen screening is associated with a survival benefit in Tanzania. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 80:205–213. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Nalintya E, Meya DB, Lofgren S, Huppler Hullsiek K, Boulware DR, Rajasingham R. 2018. A prospective evaluation of a multisite cryptococcal screening and treatment program in HIV clinics in Uganda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 78:231–238. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001669 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Wake RM, Britz E, Sriruttan C, Rukasha I, Omar T, Spencer DC, Nel JS, Mashamaite S, Adelekan A, Chiller TM, Jarvis JN, Harrison TS, Govender NP. 2018. High cryptococcal antigen titers in blood are predictive of subclinical cryptococcal meningitis among human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Clin Infect Dis 66:686–692. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Govender N, St. George’s University of . 2023. Effect trial: treatment of cryptococcal antigen-positive patients identified through screening using fluconazole plus flucytosine vs fluconazole alone. Available from: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN30579828. Retrieved 14 Apr 2023.
  • 64. Meya D. 2023. Evaluation of CrAg screening with enhanced antifungal therapy for asymptomatic CrAg+ persons. NCT03945448. Clinical trial registration. clinicaltrials.gov
  • 65. Boulware DR, Meya DB, Muzoora C, Rolfes MA, Huppler Hullsiek K, Musubire A, Taseera K, Nabeta HW, Schutz C, Williams DA, Rajasingham R, Rhein J, Thienemann F, Lo MW, Nielsen K, Bergemann TL, Kambugu A, Manabe YC, Janoff EN, Bohjanen PR, Meintjes G. 2014. Timing of antiretroviral therapy after diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis. N Engl J Med 371:1166–1167. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1409052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Rajasingham R, Wake RM, Beyene T, Katende A, Letang E, Boulware DR. 2019. Cryptococcal meningitis diagnostics and screening in the era of point-of-care laboratory testing. J Clin Microbiol 57:e01238-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01238-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Nayak R, Xu J. 2010. Effects of sertraline hydrochloride and fluconazole combinations on Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii. Mycology 1:99–105. doi: 10.1080/21501203.2010.487054 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Zhai B, Wu C, Wang L, Sachs MS, Lin X. 2012. The antidepressant sertraline provides a promising therapeutic option for neurotropic cryptococcal infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:3758–3766. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00212-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Harrison TS, Lawrence DS, Mwandumba HC, Boulware DR, Hosseinipour MC, Lortholary O, Meintjes G, Mosepele M, Jarvis JN. 2023. How applicable is the single-dose ambition regimen for human immunodeficiency virus–associated cryptococcal meningitis to high-income settings? Clin Infect Dis 76:944–949. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Nelson M, Dockrell D, Edwards S, Angus B, Barton S, Beeching N, Bergin C, Boffito M, Breen R, Cartledge J, et al. 2011. British HIV association and British infection association guidelines for the treatment of opportunistic infection in HIV-seropositive individuals 2011. HIV Med 12 Suppl 2:1–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2011.00944_1.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Ryom L, Cotter A, De Miguel R, Béguelin C, Podlekareva D, Arribas JR, Marzolini C, Mallon P, Rauch A, Kirk O, Molina JM, Guaraldi G, Winston A, Bhagani S, Cinque P, Kowalska JD, Collins S, Battegay M, EACS Governing Board . 2020. 2019 update of the European AIDS clinical society guidelines for treatment of people living with HIV version 10.0. HIV Med 21:617–624. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Hamill RJ, Sobel JD, El-Sadr W, Johnson PC, Graybill JR, Javaly K, Barker DE. 2010. Comparison of 2 doses of liposomal amphotericin B and conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate for treatment of AIDS-associated acute cryptococcal meningitis: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial of efficacy and safety. Clin Infect Dis 51:225–232. doi: 10.1086/653606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Jarvis JN, Casazza JP, Stone HH, Meintjes G, Lawn SD, Levitz SM, Harrison TS, Koup RA. 2013. The phenotype of the Cryptococcus-specific CD4+ memory T-cell response is associated with disease severity and outcome in HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis. J Infect Dis 207:1817–1828. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Bii CC, Makimura K, Abe S, Taguchi H, Mugasia OM, Revathi G, Wamae NC, Kamiya S. 2007. Antifungal drug susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans from clinical sources in Nairobi, Kenya. Mycoses 50:25–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2006.01293.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Nyazika TK, Herkert PF, Hagen F, Mateveke K, Robertson VJ, Meis JF. 2016. In vitro antifungal susceptibility profiles of Cryptococcus species isolated from HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis patients in Zimbabwe. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 86:289–292. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Ngan NTT, Thanh Hoang Le N, Vi Vi NN, Van NTT, Mai NTH, Van Anh D, Trieu PH, Lan NPH, Phu NH, Chau NVV, Lalloo DG, Hope W, Beardsley J, White NJ, Geskus R, Thwaites GE, Krysan D, Tai LTH, Kestelyn E, Binh TQ, Hung LQ, Tung NLN, Day JN. 2021. An open label randomized controlled trial of tamoxifen combined with amphotericin B and fluconazole for cryptococcal meningitis. Elife 10:e68929. doi: 10.7554/eLife.68929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. de Gans J, van de Beek D, European Dexamethasone in Adulthood Bacterial Meningitis Study Investigators . 2002. Dexamethasone in adults with bacterial meningitis. N Engl J Med 347:1549–1556. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Thwaites GE, Nguyen DB, Nguyen HD, Hoang TQ, Do TTO, Nguyen TCT, Nguyen QH, Nguyen TT, Nguyen NH, Nguyen TNL, Nguyen NL, Nguyen HD, Vu NT, Cao HH, Tran THC, Pham PM, Nguyen TD, Stepniewska K, White NJ, Tran TH, Farrar JJ. 2004. Dexamethasone for the treatment of tuberculous meningitis in adolescents and adults. N Engl J Med 351:1741–1751. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040573 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Beardsley J, Wolbers M, Kibengo FM, Ggayi A-B, Kamali A, Cuc NTK, Binh TQ, Chau NVV, Farrar J, Merson L, et al. 2016. Adjunctive dexamethasone in HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis. N Engl J Med 374:542–554. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Pirofski L-A, Casadevall A. 2017. Immune-mediated damage completes the parabola: Cryptococcus neoformans pathogenesis can reflect the outcome of a weak or strong immune response. mBio 8:e02063-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02063-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Pirofski L-A, Casadevall A. 2018. The damage-response framework as a tool for the physician-scientist to understand the pathogenesis of infectious diseases. J Infect Dis 218:S7–S11. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Rolfes MA, Rhein J, Schutz C, Taseera K, Nabeta HW, Huppler Hullsiek K, Akampuira A, Rajasingham R, Musubire A, Williams DA, Thienemann F, Bohjanen PR, Muzoora C, Meintjes G, Meya DB, Boulware DR. 2015. Cerebrospinal fluid culture positivity and clinical outcomes after amphotericin-based induction therapy for cryptococcal meningitis. Open Forum Infect Dis 2:fv157. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofv157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. van der Horst CM, Saag MS, Cloud GA, Hamill RJ, Graybill JR, Sobel JD, Johnson PC, Tuazon CU, Kerkering T, Moskovitz BL, Powderly WG, Dismukes WE. 1997. Treatment of cryptococcal meningitis associated with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. National institute of allergy and infectious diseases mycoses study group and AIDS clinical trials group. N Engl J Med 337:15–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199707033370103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Mootsikapun P, Chetchotisakd P, Anunnatsiri S, Choksawadphinyo K. 2003. The efficacy of fluconazole 600 mg/day versus itraconazole 600 mg/day as consolidation therapy of cryptococcal meningitis in AIDS patients. J Med Assoc Thail Chotmaihet Thangphaet 86:293–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Yao Y, Zhang JT, Yan B, Gao T, Xing XW, Tian CL, Huang XS, Yu SY. 2015. Voriconazole: a novel treatment option for cryptococcal meningitis. Infect Dis (Lond) 47:694–700. doi: 10.3109/23744235.2015.1044260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Cheong JWS, McCormack J. 2013. Fluconazole resistance in cryptococcal disease: emerging or intrinsic? Med Mycol 51:261–269. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2012.715763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Alexander BD, Procop GW, Dufresne P, Fuller J, Ghannoum M, Hanson K, Holliday D, Holliday N, Kovanda L, Lockhart S, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Scheutz A, Wiederhold N, Zelazny A. 2017. M27: reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. In Clin lab stand Inst, 4th edition. https://clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/documents/m27. [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Arendrup MC, Barchiesi F, Bille J, Chryssanthou E, Cuenca-Estrella M, Dannaoui E, Denning DW, Donnelly JP, Dromer F, Fegeler W, Lass-Flörl C, Moore C, Richardson M, Sandven P, Velegraki A, Verweij P. 2008. EUCAST definitive document EDef 7.1: method for the determination of broth dilution MICs of antifungal agents for fermentative yeasts: subcommittee on antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) of the ESCMID European committee for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (EUCAST)∗. Clin Microbiol Infect 14:398–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01935.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Bozzette SA, Larsen RA, Chiu J, Leal MAE, Jacobsen J, Rothman P, Robinson P, Gilbert G, McCutchan JA, Tilles J, Leedom JM, Richman DD, Meng TC, Large K, McCarthy M, Fegan C, Fitzgibbons S, Buell DN. 1991. A placebo-controlled trial of maintenance therapy with fluconazole after treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med 324:580–584. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199102283240902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Powderly WG, Saag MS, Cloud GA, Robinson P, Meyer RD, Jacobson JM, Graybill JR, Sugar AM, McAuliffe VJ, Follansbee SE, Tuazon CU, Stern JJ, Feinberg J, Hafner R, Dismukes WE, the NIAID AIDS Clinical Trials Group, the NIAID Mycoses Study Group* . 1992. A controlled trial of fluconazole or amphotericin B to prevent relapse of cryptococcal meningitis in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med 326:793–798. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199203193261203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Saag MS, Powderly WG, Cloud GA, Robinson P, Grieco MH, Sharkey PK, Thompson SE, Sugar AM, Tuazon CU, Fisher JF. 1992. Comparison of amphotericin B with fluconazole in the treatment of acute AIDS-associated cryptococcal meningitis. The NIAID mycoses study group and the AIDS clinical trials group. N Engl J Med 326:83–89. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199201093260202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Bicanic T, Brouwer AE, Meintjes G, Rebe K, Limmathurotsakul D, Chierakul W, Teparrakkul P, Loyse A, White NJ, Wood R, Jaffar S, Harrison T. 2009. Relationship of cerebrospinal fluid pressure, fungal burden and outcome in patients with cryptococcal meningitis undergoing serial lumbar punctures. AIDS 23:701–706. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32832605fe [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Kagimu E, Engen N, Ssebambulidde K, Kasibante J, Kiiza TK, Mpoza E, Tugume L, Nuwagira E, Nsangi L, Williams DA, Hullsiek KH, Boulware DR, Meya DB, Rhein J, Abassi M, Musubire AK. 2022. Therapeutic lumbar punctures in human immunodeficiency virus-associated cryptococcal meningitis: should opening pressure direct management? Open Forum Infect Dis 9:fac416. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Rolfes MA, Hullsiek KH, Rhein J, Nabeta HW, Taseera K, Schutz C, Musubire A, Rajasingham R, Williams DA, Thienemann F, Muzoora C, Meintjes G, Meya DB, Boulware DR. 2014. The effect of therapeutic lumbar punctures on acute mortality from cryptococcal meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 59:1607–1614. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Loyse A, Moodley A, Rich P, Molloy SF, Bicanic T, Bishop L, Rae WID, Bhigjee AI, Loubser ND, Michowicz AJ, Wilson D, Harrison TS. 2015. Neurological, visual, and MRI brain scan findings in 87 South African patients with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningoencephalitis. J Infect 70:668–675. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Orem J, Tindyebwa L, Twinoweitu O, Mukasa B, Tomberland M, Mbidde EK. 2005. Feasibility study of serial lumbar puncture and acetazolamide combination in the management of elevated cerebrospinal fluid pressure in AIDS patients with cryptococcal meningitis in Uganda. Trop Doct 35:19–21. doi: 10.1258/0049475053001967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Newton PN, Thai LH, Tip NQ, Short JM, Chierakul W, Rajanuwong A, Pitisuttithum P, Chasombat S, Phonrat B, Maek-A-Nantawat W, Teaunadi R, Lalloo DG, White NJ. 2002. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of acetazolamide for the treatment of elevated intracranial pressure in cryptococcal meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 35:769–772. doi: 10.1086/342299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Bahr NC, Rolfes MA, Musubire A, Nabeta H, Williams DA, Rhein J, Kambugu A, Meya DB, Boulware DR. 2014. Standardized electrolyte supplementation and fluid management improves survival during amphotericin therapy for cryptococcal meningitis in resource-limited settings. Open Forum Infect Dis 1:ofu070. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofu070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Khoo SH, Bond J, Denning DW. 1994. Administering amphotericin B--a practical approach. J Antimicrob Chemother 33:203–213. doi: 10.1093/jac/33.2.203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Bicanic T, Bottomley C, Loyse A, Brouwer AE, Muzoora C, Taseera K, Jackson A, Phulusa J, Hosseinipour MC, van der Horst C, Limmathurotsakul D, White NJ, Wilson D, Wood R, Meintjes G, Harrison TS, Jarvis JN. 2015. Toxicity of amphotericin B deoxycholate-based induction therapy in patients with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:7224–7231. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01698-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Tugume L, Morawski BM, Abassi M, Bahr NC, Kiggundu R, Nabeta HW, Hullsiek KH, Taseera K, Musubire AK, Schutz C, Muzoora C, Williams DA, Rolfes MA, Meintjes G, Rhein J, Meya DB, Boulware DR. 2017. Prognostic implications of baseline anaemia and changes in haemoglobin concentrations with amphotericin B therapy for cryptococcal meningitis. HIV Medicine 18:13–20. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Vermes A, Guchelaar HJ, Dankert J. 2000. Flucytosine: a review of its pharmacology, clinical indications, pharmacokinetics, toxicity and drug interactions. J Antimicrob Chemother 46:171–179. doi: 10.1093/jac/46.2.171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Vermes A, Guchelaar H-J, van Kuilenburg ABP, Dankert J. 2002. 5-fluorocytosine-related bone-marrow depression and conversion to fluorouracil: a pilot study. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 16:39–47. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-8206.2002.00064.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Ashbee HR, Barnes RA, Johnson EM, Richardson MD, Gorton R, Hope WW. 2014. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antifungal agents: guidelines from the British society for medical mycology. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:1162–1176. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Stamm AM, Diasio RB, Dismukes WE, Shadomy S, Cloud GA, Bowles CA, Karam GH, Espinel-Ingroff A. 1987. Toxicity of amphotericin I3 plus flucytosine in I94 patients with cryptococcal meningitis. Am J Med 83:236–242. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90691-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Normark S, Schönebeck J. 1972. In vitro studies of 5-fluorocytosine resistance in Candida albicans and Torulopsis glabrata. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2:114–121. doi: 10.1128/AAC.2.3.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Lo Re V, Carbonari DM, Lewis JD, Forde KA, Goldberg DS, Reddy KR, Haynes K, Roy JA, Sha D, Marks AR, Schneider JL, Strom BL, Corley DA. 2016. Oral azole antifungal medications and risk of acute liver injury, overall and by chronic liver disease status. Am J Med 129:283–291. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.10.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Benitez LL, Carver PL. 2019. Adverse effects associated with long-term administration of azole antifungal agents. Drugs 79:833–853. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-01127-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Bayhan GI, Garipardic M, Karaman K, Akbayram S. 2016. Voriconazole-associated visual disturbances and hallucinations. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 35:80–82. doi: 10.3109/15569527.2015.1020544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Zonios DI, Gea-Banacloche J, Childs R, Bennett JE. 2008. Hallucinations during voriconazole therapy. Clin Infect Dis 47:e7–e10. doi: 10.1086/588844 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Skipper CP, Atukunda M, Stadelman A, Engen NW, Bangdiwala AS, Hullsiek KH, Abassi M, Rhein J, Nicol MR, Laker E, Williams DA, Mannino R, Matkovits T, Meya DB, Boulware DR. 2020. Phase I enACT trial of the safety and tolerability of a novel oral formulation of amphotericin B. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e00838-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00838-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Lu R, Hollingsworth C, Qiu J, Wang A, Hughes E, Xin X, Konrath KM, Elsegeiny W, Park Y-D, Atakulu L, Craft JC, Tramont EC, Mannino R, Williamson PR, Huffnagle GB, Levitz S, Kozel T. 2019. Efficacy of oral encochleated amphotericin B in a mouse model of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis. mBio 10:e00724-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00724-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov . 2023. Encochleated oral amphotericin for cryptococcal meningitis trial 3. Available from: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05541107. Retrieved 18 Aug 2023.
  • 114. Boulware DR, Atukunda M, Kagimu E, Musubire AK, Akampurira A, Tugume L, Ssebambulidde K, Kasibante J, Nsangi L, Mugabi T, et al. 2023. Oral lipid nanocrystal amphotericin B for cryptococcal meningitis: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Infect Dis:ciad440. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Iyer KR, Revie NM, Fu C, Robbins N, Cowen LE. 2021. Treatment strategies for cryptococcal infection: challenges, advances and future outlook. 7. Nat Rev Microbiol 19:454–466. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00511-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. de Oliveira HC, Joffe LS, Simon KS, Castelli RF, Reis FCG, Bryan AM, Borges BS, Medeiros LCS, Bocca AL, Del Poeta M, Rodrigues ML. 2020. Fenbendazole controls in vitro growth, virulence potential, and animal infection in the Cryptococcus model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e00286-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00286-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Nakamura S, Ikeda-Dantsuji Y, Jin L, Higashi Y, Abe M, Inukai T, Nagi M, Urai M, Miyazaki Y. 2019. Macrolides inhibit capsule formation of highly virulent Cryptococcus gattii and promote innate immune susceptibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e02364-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02364-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Casadevall A, Cleare W, Feldmesser M, Glatman-Freedman A, Goldman DL, Kozel TR, Lendvai N, Mukherjee J, Pirofski LA, Rivera J, Rosas AL, Scharff MD, Valadon P, Westin K, Zhong Z. 1998. Characterization of a murine monoclonal antibody to Cryptococcus neoformans polysaccharide that is a candidate for human therapeutic studies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:1437–1446. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.6.1437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Shaw KJ, Schell WA, Covel J, Duboc G, Giamberardino C, Kapoor M, Moloney M, Soltow QA, Tenor JL, Toffaletti DL, Trzoss M, Webb P, Perfect JR. 2018. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of APX001A/APX001 and other Gwt1 inhibitors against Cryptococcus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00523-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00523-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Wan Z, Tao R, Hui J, Liu X, Peng X, Guo Y, Zhu X, Huang Y, Zhu B. 2023. Efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis patients with persistent intracranial inflammation: an open-label, single-arm, prospective interventional study. J Neuroinflammation 20:38. doi: 10.1186/s12974-023-02717-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Zolopa A, Andersen J, Powderly W, Sanchez A, Sanne I, Suckow C, Hogg E, Komarow L. 2009. Early antiretroviral therapy reduces AIDS progression/death in individuals with acute opportunistic infections: a multicenter randomized strategy trial. PLoS One 4:e5575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Haddow LJ, Colebunders R, Meintjes G, Lawn SD, Elliott JH, Manabe YC, Bohjanen PR, Sungkanuparph S, Easterbrook PJ, French MA, Boulware DR, International Network for the Study of HIV-associated IRIS (INSHI) . 2010. Cryptococcal immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in HIV-1-infected individuals: proposed clinical case definitions. Lancet Infect Dis 10:791–802. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70170-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Shelburne SA, Darcourt J, White AC, Greenberg SB, Hamill RJ, Atmar RL, Visnegarwala F. 2005. The role of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in AIDS-related Cryptococcus neoformans disease in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis 40:1049–1052. doi: 10.1086/428618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Longley N, Harrison TS, Jarvis JN. 2013. Cryptococcal immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Curr Opin Infect Dis 26:26–34. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32835c21d1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Bisson GP, Molefi M, Bellamy S, Thakur R, Steenhoff A, Tamuhla N, Rantleru T, Tsimako I, Gluckman S, Ravimohan S, Weissman D, Tebas P. 2013. Early versus delayed antiretroviral therapy and cerebrospinal fluid fungal clearance in adults with HIV and cryptococcal meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 56:1165–1173. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Makadzange AT, Ndhlovu CE, Takarinda K, Reid M, Kurangwa M, Gona P, Hakim JG. 2010. Early versus delayed initiation of antiretroviral therapy for concurrent HIV infection and cryptococcal meningitis in Sub‐Saharan Africa. Clin Infect Dis 50:1532–1538. doi: 10.1086/652652 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Ingle SM, Miro JM, May MT, Cain LE, Schwimmer C, Zangerle R, Sambatakou H, Cazanave C, Reiss P, Brandes V, et al. 2023. Early antiretroviral therapy not associated with higher cryptococcal meningitis mortality in people with human immunodeficiency virus in high-income countries: an international collaborative cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 77:64–73. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Boulware DR, Jarvis JN. 2023. Timing of antiretroviral therapy in cryptococcal meningitis: what we can (and cannot) learn from observational data. Clin Infect Dis 77:74–76. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Morgan J, McCarthy KM, Gould S, Fan K, Arthington-Skaggs B, Iqbal N, Stamey K, Hajjeh RA, Brandt ME, Gauteng Cryptococcal Surveillance Initiative Group . 2006. Cryptococcus gattii infection: characteristics and epidemiology of cases identified in a South African province with high HIV seroprevalence, 2002–2004. Clin Infect Dis 43:1077–1080. doi: 10.1086/507897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Steele KT, Thakur R, Nthobatsang R, Steenhoff AP, Bisson GP. 2010. In-hospital mortality of HIV-infected cryptococcal meningitis patients with C. gattii and C. neoformans infection in Gaborone, Botswana. Med Mycol 48:1112–1115. doi: 10.3109/13693781003774689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Chen S, Sorrell T, Nimmo G, Speed B, Currie B, Ellis D, Marriott D, Pfeiffer T, Parr D, Byth K. 2000. Epidemiology and host- and variety-dependent characteristics of infection due to Cryptococcus neoformans in Australia and New Zealand. Australasian cryptococcal study group. Clin Infect Dis 31:499–508. doi: 10.1086/313992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Mitchell DH, Sorrell TC, Allworth AM, Heath CH, McGregor AR, Papanaoum K, Richards MJ, Gottlieb T. 1995. Cryptococcal disease of the CNS in immunocompetent hosts: influence of cryptococcal variety on clinical manifestations and outcome. Clin Infect Dis 20:611–616. doi: 10.1093/clinids/20.3.611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Stephen C, Lester S, Black W, Fyfe M, Raverty S. 2002. Multispecies outbreak of cryptococcosis on southern Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Can Vet J 43:792–794. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Hoang LMN, Maguire JA, Doyle P, Fyfe M, Roscoe DL. 2004. Cryptococcus neoformans infections at Vancouver hospital and health sciences centre (1997-2002): epidemiology, microbiology and histopathology. J Med Microbiol 53:935–940. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.05427-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Galanis E, Macdougall L, Kidd S, Morshed M, British Columbia Cryptococcus gattii Working Group . 2010. Epidemiology of Cryptococcus gattii, British Columbia, Canada, 1999-2007. Emerg Infect Dis 16:251–257. doi: 10.3201/eid1602.090900 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Datta K, Bartlett KH, Baer R, Byrnes E, Galanis E, Heitman J, Hoang L, Leslie MJ, MacDougall L, Magill SS, Morshed MG, Marr KA, Cryptococcus gattii Working Group of the Pacific Northwest . 2009. Spread of Cryptococcus gattii into Pacific Northwest Region of the United States. Emerg Infect Dis 15:1185–1191. doi: 10.3201/eid1508.081384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Chen SC-A, Korman TM, Slavin MA, Marriott D, Byth K, Bak N, Currie BJ, Hajkowicz K, Heath CH, Kidd S, McBride WJH, Meyer W, Murray R, Playford EG, Sorrell TC, Australia and New Zealand Mycoses Interest Group (ANZMIG) Cryptococcus Study . 2013. Antifungal therapy and management of complications of cryptococcosis due to Cryptococcus gattii. Clin Infect Dis 57:543–551. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Chen SC-A, Slavin MA, Heath CH, Playford EG, Byth K, Marriott D, Kidd SE, Bak N, Currie B, Hajkowicz K, Korman TM, McBride WJH, Meyer W, Murray R, Sorrell TC, Australia and New Zealand Mycoses Interest Group (ANZMIG)-Cryptococcus Study . 2012. Clinical manifestations of Cryptococcus gattii infection: determinants of neurological sequelae and death. Clin Infect Dis 55:789–798. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. US Food and Drug Administration . 2011. FDA drug safety communication: use of long-term, high-dose diflucan (fluconazole) during pregnancy may be associated with birth defects in infants
  • 140. Pilmis B, Jullien V, Sobel J, Lecuit M, Lortholary O, Charlier C. 2015. Antifungal drugs during pregnancy: an updated review. J Antimicrob Chemother 70:14–22. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Mølgaard-Nielsen D, Pasternak B, Hviid A. 2013. Use of oral fluconazole during pregnancy and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med 369:2061–2062. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1312226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Pastick KA, Nalintya E, Tugume L, Ssebambulidde K, Stephens N, Evans EE, Ndyetukira JF, Nuwagira E, Skipper C, Muzoora C, Meya DB, Rhein J, Boulware DR, Rajasingham R. 2020. Cryptococcosis in pregnancy and the postpartum period: case series and systematic review with recommendations for management. Med Mycol 58:282–292. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myz084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Spitzer ED, Spitzer SG, Freundlich LF, Casadevall A. 1993. Persistence of initial infection in recurrent Cryptococcus neoformans meningitis. Lancet 341:595–596. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90354-j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Casadevall A, Spitzer ED, Webb D, Rinaldi MG. 1993. Susceptibilities of serial Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from patients with recurrent cryptococcal meningitis to amphotericin B and fluconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37:1383–1386. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.6.1383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Pfaller M, Zhang J, Messer S, Tumberland M, Mbidde E, Jessup C, Ghannoum M. 1998. Molecular epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from Ugandan AIDS patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 32:191–199. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(98)00095-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Bicanic T, Harrison T, Niepieklo A, Dyakopu N, Meintjes G. 2006. Symptomatic relapse of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis after initial fluconazole monotherapy: the role of fluconazole resistance and immune reconstitution. Clin Infect Dis 43:1069–1073. doi: 10.1086/507895 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Rex JH, Pfaller MA. 2002. Has antifungal susceptibility testing come of age? Clin Infect Dis 35:982–989. doi: 10.1086/342384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Berkow EL, Lockhart SR, Ostrosky-Zeichner L. 2020. Antifungal susceptibility testing: current approaches. Clin Microbiol Rev 33:e00069-19. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00069-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Brunel A-S, Reynes J, Tuaillon E, Rubbo P-A, Lortholary O, Montes B, Le Moing V, Makinson A. 2012. Thalidomide for steroid-dependent immune reconstitution inflammatory syndromes during AIDS. AIDS 26:2110–2112. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328358daea [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Abassi M, Rhein J, Meya DB, Boulware DR. 2018. Cryptococcal disease in the era of "test and treat": is there cause for concern? Open Forum Infect Dis 5:fx274. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Rhein J, Hullsiek KH, Evans EE, Tugume L, Nuwagira E, Ssebambulidde K, Kiggundu R, Mpoza E, Musubire AK, Bangdiwala AS, Bahr NC, Williams DA, Abassi M, Muzoora C, Meya DB, Boulware DR, ASTRO-CM study team . 2018. Detrimental outcomes of unmasking cryptococcal meningitis with recent ART initiation. Open Forum Infect Dis 5:ofy122. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Ssebambulidde K, Bangdiwala AS, Kwizera R, Kandole TK, Tugume L, Kiggundu R, Mpoza E, Nuwagira E, Williams DA, Lofgren SM, Abassi M, Musubire AK, Cresswell FV, Rhein J, Muzoora C, Hullsiek KH, Boulware DR, Meya DB, Adjunctive Sertraline for Treatment of HIV-associated Cryptococcal Meningitis Team . 2019. Symptomatic cryptococcal antigenemia presenting as early cryptococcal meningitis with negative cerebral spinal fluid analysis. Clin Infect Dis 68:2094–2098. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Lehman A, Nalintya E, Wele A, Kirumira P, Naluyima R, Namuli T, Turya Musa F, Skipper CP, Meya DB, Boulware DR, Rajasingham R. 2023. Hyponatremia as a predictor of cryptococcal meningitis and death among asymptomatic persons with HIV and cryptococcal antigenemia. Open Forum Infect Dis 10:fad156. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Ramachandran PS, Cresswell FV, Meya DB, Langelier C, Crawford ED, DeRisi JL, Boulware DR, Wilson MR. 2019. Detection of Cryptococcus DNA by metagenomic next-generation sequencing in symptomatic cryptococcal antigenemia. Clin Infect Dis 68:1978–1979. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy1024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Microbiology Reviews are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES