Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 3;110(2):1126–1138. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000857

Table 2.

Results of meta-analysis comparison of LLR and RLR.

Outcomes of interest Number of studies Number of patients I2 (%) Model Overall effect size 95% CI of overall effect size P
Primary outcomes
 Overall complications 21 4908 41 Fixed OR=0.99 [0.86, 1.14] 0.91
 Severe complications 20 4880 0 Fixed OR=0.76 [0.61, 0.95] 0.02
 R0 14 3399 0 Fixed OR=1.28 [1.00, 1.63] 0.05
Secondary outcomes
 Operating time (min) 19 4502 68 Random SMD=0.07 [−0.05, 0.18] 0.25
 Blood loss (ml) 17 3912 84 Random SMD=−0.31 [−0.48, −0.14] 0.0005
 Transfusion 17 4350 29 Fixed OR=0.96 [0.78, 1.19] 0.72
 Pringle applied 16 4399 91 Random OR=0.73 [0.44, 1.22] 0.23
 Pringle duration (min) 13 2964 85 Random SMD=−0.01 [−0.22, 0.19] 0.89
 Open conversion 19 4894 45 Fixed OR=0.46 [0.37, 0.58] <0.0001
 Hospital stay (day) 18 4361 62 Random SMD=−0.02 [−0.13, 0.08] 0.66
 Reoperation 14 3914 0 Fixed OR=0.67 [0.38, 1.18] 0.20
 30-day readmission 14 3950 0 Fixed OR=1.12 [0.83, 1.51] 0.47
 30-day mortality 13 3769 0 Fixed OR=1.11 [0.55, 2.24] 0.77
 90-day mortality 15 4545 0 Fixed OR=0.79 [0.47, 1.34] 0.38

Statistically significant results are shown in bold.

LLR, laparoscopic liver resection; RLR, robotic liver resection; SMD/OR, standard mean difference/odds ratio.