Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 21;79(3):674–689. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000607

TABLE 2.

Change from baseline in the primary and secondary outcome measures at week 48 in the ITT population

Placebo (n = 56) Aldafermin 1 mg (n = 42) Aldafermin 3 mg (n = 55)
Primary end point
ELF score 0.3 (0.1) 0.2 (0.1) −0.1 (0.1)
  Difference vs. placebo −0.1 (0.1) −0.5 (0.1)
   p value vs. placebo 0.31 0.0003
 Individual components of ELF
  Hyaluronic acid, ng/mL 44.1 (23.8) 46.5 (27.1) 29.0 (24.9)
  Difference vs. placebo 2.4 (32.7) −15.1 (31.0)
   p value vs. placebo 0.94 0.63
  PIIINP, ng/mL 3.2 (1.1) 0.7 (1.3) −2.7 (1.2)
  Difference vs. placebo −2.5 (1.7) −5.9 (1.6)
   p value vs. placebo 0.14 0.0003
  TIMP-1, ng/mL 17.8 (13.2) 6.8 (15.3) −14.9 (13.8)
  Difference vs. placebo −11.0 (18.7) −32.7 (17.8)
   p value vs. placebo 0.56 0.068
Secondary end points
Liver histology
  Fibrosis improvement of ≥ 1 stage (NASH CRN criteria) 15% 21% 23%
   Difference vs. placebo (95% CI) 7% (−10 to 24) 8% (−8 to 23)
    p value vs. placebo 0.39 0.36
  Fibrosis improvement of ≥ 1 stage without NASH worsening 13% 16% 20%
   Difference vs. placebo (95% CI) 4% (−11 to 20) 7% (−8 to 22)
    p value vs. placebo 0.54 0.37
Markers of target engagement
  C4, ng/mL −10.2 (2.8) −33.8 (3.3) −37.7 (3.0)
   Difference vs. placebo −23.6 (4.1) −27.5 (3.9)
    p value vs. placebo <0.0001 <0.0001
  C4, %, relative −1.8% (7.7) −66.8% (9.4) −73.5% (8.5)
   Difference vs. placebo −65.1% (11.6) −71.8% (11.0)
    p value vs. placebo <0.0001 <0.0001
  TBA, µmol/L 0.9 (1.8) −4.7 (2.1) −5.4 (1.9)
   Difference vs. placebo −5.6 (2.4) −6.3 (2.2)
    p value vs. placebo 0.022 0.0053
  TBA, %, relative 31.7% (14.7) −35.5% (17.4) −50.5% (15.4)
   Difference vs. placebo −67.3% (19.5) −82.3% (18.1)
    p value vs. placebo 0.0008 <0.0001
Liver enzymes
  ALT, U/L −5.7 (2.3) −19.2 (2.6) −22.7 (2.4)
   Difference vs. placebo −13.5 (3.3) −17.0 (3.1)
    p value vs. placebo 0.0001 <0.0001
  ALT, %, relative −6.3% (4.0) −35.9% (4.7) −41.5% (4.3)
   Difference vs. placebo −29.6% (5.8) −35.2% (5.6)
    p value vs. placebo <0.0001 <0.0001
  AST, U/L −2.4 (2.1) −9.7 (2.5) −13.9 (2.3)
   Difference vs. placebo −7.3 (3.0) −11.6 (2.9)
    p value vs. placebo 0.018 0.0001
  AST, %, relative −0.4% (4.5) −19.2% (5.2) −28.3% (4.7)
   Difference vs. placebo −18.8% (6.4) −27.9% (6.1)
    p value vs. placebo 0.0043 <0.0001
 Fibrogenesis marker
  Pro-C3, ng/mL 12.7 (6.2) −9.3 (7.2) −13.1 (6.6)
   Difference vs. placebo −22.1 (9.1) −25.9 (8.7)
    p value vs. placebo 0.017 0.0034
  Pro-C3, %, relative 47.6% (19.2) −6.3% (22.3) −12.1% (20.3)
   Difference vs. placebo −54.0% (29.2) −59.7% (27.6)
    p value vs. placebo 0.067 0.032
Liver stiffness by FibroScan
  LSM, kPa 0.9 (1.7) −3.2 (1.9) −1.3 (1.8)
   Difference vs. placebo −4.1 (2.3) −2.3 (2.2)
    p value vs. placebo 0.078 0.32
  LSM, %, relative 15.0% (10.1) −15.1% (11.7) −6.3% (11.0)
   Difference vs. placebo −30.1% (14.2) −21.3% (13.7)
    p value vs. placebo 0.036 0.12

Values are LS mean (SE) or proportions of patients (%).

Fibrosis improvement was defined as ≥1 stage decrease in NASH CRN fibrosis score; no worsening of NASH was defined as no increase in NAS for ballooning, no increase in inflammation, and no increase in steatosis.

Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; C4, 7alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one; ELF, Enhanced Liver Fibrosis; ITT, intention-to-treat; LS, least-squares; LSM, liver stiffness measure; NAS, NAFLD activity score; NASH CRN, NASH clinical research network; PIIINP, N-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen; Pro-C3, neoepitope-specific N-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen; TBA, total bile acids.