Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Feb 3.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet. 2024 Jan 11;403(10425):450–458. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02356-5

Table 2:

Incidence of the primary, secondary, and safety outcomes.*

Intent-to-Treat Analysis N=1950 Per Protocol Analysis N=1728
Primary Outcome Indomethacin + Stent N=975 Indomethacin Alone N=975 Indomethacin + Stent N=777 Indomethacin Alone N=951
Presence of Post-ERCP N (%) 110 (11.3%) 145 (14.9%) 90 (11.6%) 137 (14.4%)
Acute Pancreatitis 95% CI (9.3%, 13.3%) (12.6%, 17.1%) (9.3%, 13.8%) (12.2%, 16.6%)
RD (95% CI) 3.6% (0.6%, 6.6%) 2.8% (−0.3%, 6.0%)
Secondary and Safety Outcomes
Moderate-Severe Post-ERCP Pancreatitis1 58 (6.0%) 78 (8.0%) 45 (5.8%) 74 (7.8%)
RD (95% CI) 2.1% (−0.2%, 4.3%) 2.0% (−0.4%, 4.4%)
 Severe pancreatitis − n (%) 14 (1.4%) 20 (2.1%) 12 (1.5%) 19 (2.0%)
RD (95% CI) 0.6% (−0.5%, 1.8%) 0.5% (−0.8%, 1.7%)
 Pancreatitis-related Death − n (%) 0 (0%) 3 (0.3%) 0 (0%) 3 (0.3%)
RD (95% CI) 0.3% (0%, 0.7%) 0.3% (0%, 0.7%)
 ICU Admission− n (%) 39 (4.0%) 29 (3.0%) 27 (3.5%) 29 (3.0%)
RD (95% CI) −1% (−2.7%, 0.6%) −0.4% (−2.1%, 1.3%)
 Hospital length of stay N 975 975 777 951
Mean (SD) 2.9 (6.7) 3.2 (7.2) 2.8 (6.7) 3.2 (7.1)
Median (Min, Max) 0.0 (0.0, 71.0) 0.0 (0.0, 86.0) 0.0 (0.0, 62.0) 0.0 (0.0, 86.0)
Difference in Means (95% CI) 0.4 (−0.3, 1.0) 0.3 (−0.3, 1.0)
*

The intention-to-treat analysis included all randomized subjects; RD denotes risk difference for the indomethacin alone group minus the indomethacin plus stent group; CI denotes confidence interval.

*

The per protocol analysis excluded randomized subjects with any of the following predefined types of protocol deviations: eligibility violations, indomethacin not administered, treatment crossover, or missing outcome data.

1

Moderate-severe post-ERCP pancreatitis missing for 2 subjects (1 indomethacin + stent, 1 indomethacin alone) and excluded from percentage denominator.