Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 16.
Published in final edited form as: Nanotoxicology. 2024 Jan 18;17(10):669–686. doi: 10.1080/17435390.2023.2297048

Table 2.

BAL cell differential after exposure to PMET731, PMET885, and PMET540 thermal spray coating aerosols.

Treatment Groups Time (Days Post-Exposure) BAL Alveolar Macrophages (106) BAL Neutrophils (106) BAL Eosinophils (106)

Air PMET731 Day 4 4.87±0.41 0.008±0.008 0.00±0.00
5.68±0.27 0.46±0.12 0.00±0.00
Air PMET731 Day 30 4.38±0.20 0.008+0.005 0.00±0.00
5.07±0.53 0.38±0.12 0.00±0.00
Air PMET885 Day 4 4.68±0.52 0.020±0.001 0.03±0.02
12.7±1.9* 4.15±0.43* 2.29±0.74*
Air PMET885 Day 30 4.42±0.28 0.128±0.12 0.00±0.00
91.1±8.3* 18.5±3.8* 3.07±1.06*
Air PMET540 Day 4 4.61±0.17 0.005±0.005 0.00±0.00
7.81+0.60* 0.33±0.08 0.010+0.01
Air PMET540 Day 30 5.36±0.50 0.008±0.003 0.00±0.00
6.19 ±0.46 0.030±0.010 0.020±0.02

Note. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=6/treatment group within a time point) were exposed to a target concentration of 25mg/m3 × 4hr/d × 4 d. For BAL cell differential analysis, 200 cells/rat were counted.

*

Significantly different from corresponding air control within a time point (p<0.05).