Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2023 Dec 6;1232:123954. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2023.123954

Table 4:

Recovery of Analytes in 250 uL Breastmilk

Analysis Theoreticala ng/mL Measured
ng/mL (n)
Intra-assay
%CVb (n)
Inter-assay
%CVb (n)
REc (%) EEd(%) MEe (%)
25OHD3-S
Spike, solvent 4.7 4.68 ± 0.34 (6) 3 (3) 7.2 (6) −0.4 67 ± 11 -
Baseline Breastmilk - <0.2 <LOQ <LOQ - - -
Spiked Breastmilk 4.84 6.81 ± 0.75 (15) 6.4 (9) 11.0 (15) 41 - 139 ± 17
VitD3-S
Spike, solvent 4.7 5.35 ± 0.3 (6) 5.0 (3) 5.4 (6) 14 59 ± 8 -
Baseline Breastmilk - 1.70 ± 0.23 (15) 8.8 (9) 13.5 (15) - - -
Spiked Breastmilk 6.40 6.87 ± 0.92 (15) 9.3 (9) 13.5 (15) 7.3 - 94 ± 20
IS [1,25(OH)2D3-G]
Solvent - - 15.7 (n=4) 20.4 (12) - 60 ± 6 -
Breastmilk - - 7.5 (n=9) 8.4 (17) - - 169 ± 22

Statistical data are means ± SD. Replicates are derived from a common pooled sample.

a

Theoretical concentration is baseline measurement + 4.7 ng/mL of analyte.

b

Coefficient of variation (CV).

c

Relative error (RE) is [(measured - theoretical) /theoretical]*100%.

d

Extraction efficiency (EE) is [(with extraction) /(without extraction)]*100%.

e

Matrix effect (ME) is ([spike]breastmilk / [spike]solvent)*100%.