Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Cardiol. 2023 Oct 26;45(2):331–339. doi: 10.1007/s00246-023-03313-8

Table 3.

Clinical features of patients by whether LV dysfunction resolved during follow-up

Characteristics Overall
n = 32
LVD resolved
n = 26
LVD unresolved
n = 6
p-value
Age group 0.37
 Age: < 1 year 12 (38%) 11 (42%) 1 (17%)
 Age: ≥ 1 years 20 (62%) 15 (58%) 5 (83%)
Age at presentation, years 10 (0, 17) 8 (0, 17) 13 (4, 16) 0.62
Qualitative assessment of LV dysfunction at presentation1 >0.90
 Mild 10 (31%) 8 (31%) 2 (33%)
 Mild to moderate or moderate 10 (31%) 8 (31%) 2 (33%)
 Greater than moderate 12 (38%) 10 (38%) 2 (33%)
Etiology of hypertension >0.90
 Renal 19 (59%) 15 (58%) 4 (67%)
 Renovascular 6 (19%) 5 (19%) 1 (17%)
 Others 7 (22%) 6 (23%) 1 (27%)
LV hypertrophy >0.90
 Hypertrophy 9 (28%) 7 (27%) 2 (33%)
 No hypertrophy 23 (72%) 19 (73%) 4 (67%)
LV dilation 0.15
 Dilation 24 (75%) 21 (81%) 3 (50%)
 No dilation 8 (25%) 5 (19%) 3 (50%)
Symptomatic at diagnosis >0.65
 Asymptomatic 12 (38%) 9 (35%) 3 (50%)
 Symptomatic 20 (62%) 17 (65%) 3 (50%)
Time to blood pressure control, days 16.5 (5, 69) 17.5 (5.5, 73.5) 4 (1, 17) 0.12

Categorical variables are summarized as count and percentage. Continuous variables are summarized as median and interquartile range. Fisher’s exact test was performed for categorical variable and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for continuous variable, respectively.

1

LV dysfunction at presentation was combined into three groups when performing statistical tests given limited sample size.