Table 2.
ACMG/AMP Criterion | ACMG/AMP criterion description | Specification | Strength | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
BA1 | Common in population databases. | Disease-specific | Stand alone | Highest minor allele frequency >0.01 (>1%) in any continental population in gnomAD with >2000 alleles. |
BS1 | Allele frequency greater than expected for disease. | Disease-specific | Strong | Highest minor allele frequency >0.005 (>0.5%) in any continental population in gnomAD with >2000 alleles. |
BS3 | Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function. | Disease-specific, strength | Supporting | >50% activity when the variant is expressed in a heterologous cell type, or >30% activity if there is also evidence of normal synthesis and processing. |
BS4 | Lack of segregation in affected members of a family. | Not used | N/A | N/A |
BP1 | Missense variant in gene where only LOF causes disease. | Not used | N/A | N/A |
BP2 | Observed in cis with a pathogenic variant. | None | Supporting | No changes |
BP3 | In-frame deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known function. | Not used | N/A | N/A |
BP4 | Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product. | Gene-specific | Supporting | • REVEL score <0.5 for missense variants. • In-frame deletion or insertion predicted benign by 2 out of 3 tools (e.g. PROVEAN, MutationTaster, and MutPred-InDel). • No predicted impact on splicing by SpliceAI (score <0.2) |
BP5 | Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease. | Not used | N/A | N/A |
BP6 | Reputable source recently reports the variant as benign but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation. | Not used | N/A | N/A60 |
BP7 | A synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence nor the creation of a new splice site AND the nucleotide is not highly conserved. | None | Supporting | No changes |