Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 17;25:151. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07268-6

Table 2.

Comparison among the internal structures of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (n = 335)

Structures Chi-square/DF CFI TLI RMSEA (90% CI) AIC BIC
Structure 1 6.28 0.687 0.642 0.126 (0.117, 0.135) 15,762.366 15,892.046
Structure 2 4.98 0.846 0.807 0.109 (0.095, 0.124) 10,260.713 10,274.837
Structure 3 4.25 0.877 0.843 0.099 (0.084, 0.114) 10,232.692 10,320.417
Structure 4 2.75 0.950 0.931 0.072 (0.053, 0.093) 8351.278 8423.747

Structure 1: 1 domain and all 17 items; Structure 2: 1 domain and 11 items (1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 15 and 17); Structure 3: 2 domains and 11 items (domain 1: items 1, 2, 10, 13, 15 and 17; domain 2: items 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11); Structure 4: 2 domains and 9 items (domain 1: items 1, 10, 13 and 17; domain 2: items 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11)

DF degree of freedom: CFI comparative fit index: TLI Tucker-Lewis index: RMSEA root mean square error of approximation: CI confidence interval: AIC Akaike information criterion: BIC Bayesian information criterion