Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 6;47(3):261–270. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01389-y

Table 2.

Description of the cohort of case reports

Total
186 (100%)
Training
93 (100%)
Validation
93 (100%)
Expert assessment
Poor 30 (16.1%) 9 (9.7%) 21 (22.6%)
Moderate 35 (18.8%) 14 (15.1%) 21 (22.6%)
Good 55 (29.6%) 30 (32.3%) 25 (26.9%)
Excellent 66 (35.5%) 40 (43.0%) 26 (28.0%)
Source
Spontaneous reports 25 (13.4%) 17 (18.3%) 8 (8.6%)
Literature reports 23 (12.4%) 9 (9.7%) 14 (15.1%)
TIS (UK) 28 (15.1%) 10 (10.8%) 18 (19.4%)
TIS (Switzerland) 27 (14.5%) 17 (18.3%) 10 (10.8%)
The Dutch Pregnancy Drug Register 30 (16.1%) 12 (12.9%) 18 (19.4%)
Gilenya pregnancy registry 28 (15.1%) 15 (16.1%) 13 (14.0%)
Enhanced PV programme 25 (13.4%) 13 (14.0%) 12 (12.9%)
Clinical scenario
Pregnancy loss 33 (17.7%) 19 (20.4%) 14 (15.1%)
Congenital anomalies or chromosomal defects 37 (19.9%) 18 (19.4%) 19 (20.4%)
Foetal or neo-natal complications 35 (18.8%) 18 (19.4%) 17 (18.3%)
Infant or child complications 3 (1.6%) 0 3 (3.2%)
Maternal pregnancy-related complications 33 (17.7%) 18 (19.4%) 15 (16.1%)
No adverse outcomes or complications 43 (23.1%) 19 (20.4%) 24 (25.8%)
Other 2 (1.1%) 1 (1.1%) 1 (1.1%)

PV pharmacovigilance, TIS Teratology Information Services