Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 18.
Published in final edited form as: Annu Rev Med. 2022 Jan 27;73:575–585. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-042120-014904

Table 1.

Comparison of reportable variant types detected by different genetic testing assays

Genetic
test
SNVs/Indels CNVs Mosaic
variants
Repeat
expansions
Balanced
and
complex
SVs
mtDNA Genes
tested
VUS
potentiala
Costa
Sanger Yes No Limited No No If included Single–few + $$
CMA No Yes Yes (CNV only) No No No Up to ~20,000 ++ $$
NGS panel Yes Yes Yes No No If included Few–hundreds ++ $
WES Yes Limited Limited (depends on coverage) No No If included ~20,000 (coding regions only) +++ $$$
WGS Yes Yes Limited (depends on coverage) Yes Yes Yes ~20,000 (coding and noncoding regions) ++++ $$$$
a

VUS potential and cost are compared on a scale from one symbol (lowest) to four (highest).

Abbreviations: CMA, chromosomal microarray; CNV, copy-number variation; Indel, small (<150 base pair) insertion/deletion; mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; NGS, next-generation sequencing; SNV, single-nucleotide variant; SV, structural variant; VUS, variant of uncertain significance; WES, whole-exome sequencing; WGS, whole-genome sequencing.