Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 18;20:31. doi: 10.1186/s13007-024-01152-z

Table 2.

Advantages and inconveniences of methods, alternative to portable MRI, used to measure water content, plant structure, xylem and phloem fluxes, and cavitation

Parameter measured Method Advantages Disadvantages
Anatomy Microscopy Affordable; easy to perform; high spatial resolution (from a few hundredths of a nanometer for electronic to a couple of tenths of a micrometer for optic) Destructive; Limited to laboratory; only a small portion of sample can be observed at once
X-ray (µ)radiography High spatial (~ 50–100 μm) and temporal (~ tens of seconds per scan) resolution; non-invasive Limited to laboratory; possible impact of ionizing radiation; expensive; not easily accessible
Neutron radiography High spatial (~ 100 μm) and temporal (~ tens of seconds per scan) resolution; non-invasive; adapted to dense materials Limited to laboratory; expensive; not easily accessible; possible impact of neutron radiation on plant tissue; limited to plants that fit in a thin container
Dye tracing Affordable; easy to perform; portable Destructive
Air-coupled ultrasound Non-invasive; high temporal resolution (a few seconds per scan); easy to perform; affordable; portable Indirect; large variation in results
Laser-based guided waves High temporal resolution (~ a few seconds per scan); easy to perform; portable Indirect; large variation in results; laser beam can cause tissue damage
High-field MRI Non-invasive; high spatial (~ 100 μm) and temporal (from a few minutes to a few hours depending upon the experiment) resolution Limited to laboratory; expensive equipment and maintenance; not easily accessible; mainly horizontal orientation; limited plant size and shape
Water content Fresh weight/Dry weight Affordable; Easy to perform Limited to laboratory; Destructive; time consuming (overnight drying required)
NIRS Non-invasive; portable; affordable; easy to perform Indirect, results must be interpreted through models (problem of genericity); calibration particularities for a given species and/or context; limited to outermost layers of sample
THz spectroscopy Non-invasive; easy to perform; affordable; portable Indirect; results must be interpreted through models; limited to outermost layers of sample
High-field MRI Non-invasive; high spatial (~ 100 μm) and temporal (from a few minutes to a few hours depending upon the experiment) resolution Limited to laboratory; expensive equipment and maintenance; not easily accessible; mainly horizontal orientation; limited plant size and shape
Xylem flux Sap flow meters Portable; affordable; easy to perform Invasive; limited to organs with sufficient diameter
Porometers Portable; affordable; easy to perform Indirect, large margin of error in estimating sap flow due to variation between leaves
2D light transmission Non-invasive; affordable; spatial resolution (~ 200–500 μm), offers real-time data on water uptake by roots Indirect, limited to laboratory; limited to certain plants that fit in a thin container and sandy soil; no other light sources than the instrument during measurement
Gravimetric Affordable; portable; easy to perform; non-invasive Indirect
Isotopic tracing Portable Destructive; results must be interpreted through models; can be expensive (cost of radiotracers and mass spectroscopy analyses)
Dye tracing Affordable; easy to perform; portable Destructive
High-field MRI Non-invasive; high spatial (~ 100 μm) and temporal (from a few minutes to a few hours depending upon the experiment) resolution Limited to laboratory; expensive equipment and maintenance; not easily accessible; mainly horizontal orientation; limited plant size and shape
Phloem flux Aphids Affordable Limited to laboratory; Indirect, limited to certain plant species; approximative with large margin of error; can be complicated to execute
11C PET imaging Non-invasive; sufficient spatial resolution to capture water dynamics (a couple of millimeters) and high temporal (a few minutes) resolution Limited to laboratory; expensive and cumbersome equipment; possible impact of ionizing radiation
High-field MRI Non-invasive, high spatial (~ 100 μm) and temporal (from a few minutes to a few hours depending upon the experiment) resolution Limited to laboratory; expensive equipment and maintenance; not easily accessible; mainly horizontal orientation; limited plant size and shape
Cavitation Acoustic emissions Portable; easy to perform; affordable Indirect, more qualitative than quantitative, can be destructive
Dye tracing Affordable; easy to perform; portable Destructive
Xylem Embolism Meter Affordable; easy to perform Indirect, Destructive; limited to laboratory; not suitable for very small (fine roots) or large samples (> 10 cm diameter)
Microscopy Affordable; easy to perform; high spatial resolution (from a few hundredths of a nanometer for electronic to a couple of tenths of a micrometer for optic) Destructive; Limited to laboratory; only a small portion of sample can be observed at once
X-ray (µ)radiography High spatial (~ 50–100 μm) and temporal (~ tens of seconds per scan) resolution; non-invasive Limited to laboratory; possible impact of ionizing radiation; expensive; not easily accessible
Neutron radiography High spatial (~ 100 μm) and temporal (~ tens of seconds per scan) resolution; non-invasive; adapted to dense materials Limited to laboratory; expensive; not easily accessible; possible impact of neutron radiation on plant tissue; limited to plants that fit in a thin container
High-field MRI Non-invasive; high spatial (~ 100 μm) and temporal (from a few minutes to a few hours depending upon the experiment) resolution Limited to laboratory; expensive equipment and maintenance; not easily accessible; mainly horizontal orientation; limited plant size and shape