Table 3.
Variance analysis of the impact of methods on the accuracy of GEBV for fleece traits in Inner Mongolia Cashmere Goats.
Trait | Source | DF | SS | MS | F | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FL | Methods | 4 | 0.0400 | 0.0100 | 2.17 | >0.05 |
Error | 70 | 0.3222 | 0.0046 | |||
Corrected total | 74 | 0.3623 | ||||
CL | Methods | 4 | 0.0363 | 0.0091 | 2.89 | <0.05 |
Error | 70 | 0.2192 | 0.0031 | |||
Corrected total | 74 | 0.2555 | ||||
CP | Methods | 4 | 0.0513 | 0.0128 | 5.24 | <0.01 |
Error | 70 | 0.1713 | 0.0024 | |||
Corrected total | 74 | 0.2225 | ||||
CD | Methods | 4 | 0.0817 | 0.0204 | 2.08 | >0.05 |
Error | 70 | 0.6866 | 0.0098 | |||
Corrected total | 74 | 0.7683 |
p < 0.01: the difference is extremely significant; p < 0.05: the difference is significant; p > 0.05: the difference is not significant; DF, degree of freedom; SS, sum of square; MS, mean square.