Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 15;14(2):e074370. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074370

Table 2.

Summary of findings

Intervention (1st, 2nd, 3rd tiers) SRs (n) SRs (low confidence SRs in parenthesis) Overall findings*
1st tier 2nd tier 3rd tier
A. Caregiver-oriented interventions AA. Information and education AA1. Sustained sensitisation and education campaigns 1 (34) None (low confidence evidence)
AA2. Short-term sensitisation and education campaigns 12 6 8 9 11 12 35 (36–41 Positive and statistically significant
AA3. Public information campaigns 3 (41–43) None (low confidence evidence)
AB. Incentives and motivation AB1. Material/monetary incentives for caregivers 12 11 44 45 (36 38 46–52) Mixed effects
AB3. Automated voice messages to caregivers 1 (53) None (low confidence evidence)
AB4. Written or pictorial messages (SMS, stickers, flyers, etc) to caregivers 13 5 10 54–57 (36 38 39 48 53 58 59) Positive and statistically significant
AB5. Changes to health system user fees 1 (60) None (low confidence evidence)
B. Health system oriented BA. Education and training BA1. Formal health worker training and education 3 11 (38 51) Limited evidence
BB. Planning, implementation, monitoring BB5. Outreach to vulnerable populations (hard to reach, etc) 3 11 (36 43) Limited evidence
BB7. Home visits 5 11 61 (41 62 63) Positive
BC. Supplementary immunisation activities BC1. National/subnational immunisation days 2 (37 62) None (low confidence evidence)
BD. Incentives and motivation BD1. Material/monetary incentives for health workers 1 (41) None (low confidence evidence)
BD4. Written or pictorial messages to health workers 1 (46) None (low confidence evidence)
BD5. Pay-for-performance schemes 5 7 64 (46 65 66) Mixed effects
BF. Health system governance, policies and financing BF1. Health system strategic planning 7 11 (43 46 48 67–69) Limited evidence
BF4. Health system financing 3 70 71 (72) Inconclusive
BG. Technology and mHealth BG1. New Health Management Information System (HMIS) /dashboard systems 3 (39 73 74) None (low confidence evidence)
C. Other community member oriented CA. Other community member oriented CA1. Faith-based outreach/outreach using local leaders 1 (38) None (low confidence evidence)
D. Community level DA. Communication and dialogue DA1. Collaborating with whole community 1 75 Limited evidence
DA2. Collaborating with selected community groups and networks 1 76 Limited evidence
F. Multicomponent 1† 29 30 Positive and statistically significant

*In the last column, ‘overall findings’ are summarised from evidence as reported in the systematic reviews, qualitative and quantitative findings, and quantitative findings from review of reviews (RoR). Kindly refer to online supplemental appendix 9 for the expanded version of this table.

†Apart from Jain et al,29 30 there were 25 systematic reviews that assessed the effects of more than one intervention that are not part of this table. Of these reviews, the majority (18) were low confidence SRs and the intervention components were heterogenous. We provide a summary of Jain et al29 30 in this table because it is one of the only included SRs that assessed community engagement interventions. Intervention and outcome codes are taken from online supplemental appendix 1.

SMS, short message service; SR, systematic review.