Skip to main content
. 2005 May;71(5):2467–2472. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2467-2472.2005

TABLE 1.

Comparison of the microbiota recovered from demineralized dentine sampled from enamel caries lesions (initial sample) and 5 months later following removal of the restoration (final sample)a

Parameter Initial sample (n = 10)
Final sample (n = 10)
Mean ± SE Median Mean ± SE Median
Total microbial counts
    Anaerobic count 4.6 ± 0.2b 4.7 2.2 ± 0.1b 2.2
    Aerobic count 4.6 ± 0.2 4.6 2.2 ± 0.1 2.2
    Count (pH 4.8) MPN 2.9 ± 0.3 3.1 0.6 ± 0.1 0.7
    Count (pH 5.2) MPN 3.1 ± 0.3 3.3 0.9 ± 0.1 0.9
    Count (pH 7.0) MPN 4.5 ± 0.2 4.4 2.1 ± 0.1 2.1
Proportion of total anaerobic count
    Lactobacilli 14.8 ± 5.5 (8)c 9.7 NDd ND
    Veillonella spp. 0.2 ± 0.2 (5) <0.01 ND ND
    Total streptococci 4.4 ± 1.1 (10) 3.8 39.0 ± 2.1 (10)c 37.8
    S. parasanguinis 1.9 ± 0.6 (8) 1.61 ND ND
    S. gordonii 0.2 ± 0.01 (4) <0.01 ND ND
    S. oralis 0.5 ± 0.2 (7) 1.7 37.9 ± 1.8 (10) 37.7
    S. mitis 0.2 ± 0.01 (6) <0.01 0.6 ± 0.4 (2) <0.01
    S. intermedius 0.3 ± 0.1 (6) 0.2 0.5 ± 0.5 (1) <0.01
    S. anginosus 0.7 ± 0.3 (8) 0.2 ND ND
    S. mutans 1.4 ± 0.4 (9) 1.1 ND ND
    S. sobrinus 0.01 ± 0.01 (3) <0.01 ND ND
    Gram-positive pleomorphic rods 80.7 ± 5.4 (10) 87.1 61.0 ± 2.1 (10) 62.2
    A. naeslundii 44.4 ± 2.8 (10) 46.6 61.0 ± 2.1 (10) 62.2
    A. israelii 13.0 ± 4.0 (10) 9.5 ND ND
    A. gerencseriae 23.4 ± 3.3 (10) 22.9 ND ND
Proportion of MPN count at pH 7.0
    Total count (pH 4.8) MPN 3.5 ± 0.8 3.1 2.7 ± 0.3 2.8
    Total count (pH 5.2) MPN 6.2 ± 1.7 4.9 5.3 ± 0.5 5.8
a

Numbers in boldface indicate significant differences between initial and final samples (P < 0.05).

b

Log10 (CFU per sample + 1) ± SE.

c

Proportion (number of samples positive for the microorganism).

d

ND, not detected.