Skip to main content
. 2005 May;71(5):2467–2472. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2467-2472.2005

TABLE 2.

Comparison of the microbiota recovered from demineralized dentine sampled from enamel caries lesions (initial sample) and 5 months later (final sample) in media adjusted to pH 4.8, 5.2, and 7.0

Microbial taxon Initial sample (n = 10)
Final sample (n = 10)
pH 4.8 pH 5.2 pH 7.0 pH 4.8 pH 5.2 pH 7.0
Lactobacilli 62.0 (7)a 22.9 (7) 1.7 (5) NDb ND ND
Streptococci 12.1 (7) 21.7 (8) 25.8 (9) 100 (10) 98.3 (10) 12.0 (8)
S. parasanguinis 0.6 (2) 4.8 (3) 19.8 (8) ND ND ND
S. gordonii 1.5 (2) 1.7 (2) ND ND ND ND
S. oralis 6.8 (4) 15.0 (7) 6.0 (4) 2.7 (1) 84.2 (10) 7.3 (7)
S. mitis ND ND ND ND 1.3 (2) ND
S. intermedius 3.3 (3) 0.3 (1) ND 97.3 (10) 12.8 (8) 4.7 (5)
Gram-positive pleomorphic rods 26.0 (8) 55.34 (10) 72.5 (10) ND 1.7 (2) 88.0 (10)
A. naeslundii 0.3 (1) 3.4 (5) 44.1 (10) ND 1.7 (2) 88.0 (10)
A. israelii 20.7 (4) 17.0 (3) 2.9 (4) ND ND ND
A. gerencseriae 5.0 (4) 35.03 (8) 25.5 (10) ND ND ND
No. identified/no. subcultured 339/339 354/354 349/356 150/150 234/234 317/317
a

Percentage of isolates (number of samples positive).

b

ND, not detected.