Table 4.
Statistical analysis | PG | AMC | CFM | CTR | VAN | AZM | EM | TET | GEN | CM | NIT | CIP | LEV | CMX | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG | Pearson Correlation Coefficient | 1 | |||||||||||||
p-value (two tailed) | - | ||||||||||||||
AMC | Pearson Correlation Coefficient | 0.148* | 1 | ||||||||||||
p-value (two tailed) | 0.029 | ||||||||||||||
CFM | Pearson Correlation Coefficient | 0.811** | 0.120 | 1 | |||||||||||
p-value (two tailed) | < 0.001 | 0.077 | |||||||||||||
CTR | Pearson Correlation Coefficient | 0.341** | 0.434** | 0.276** | 1 | ||||||||||
p-value (two tailed) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||||||||||||
VAN | Pearson Correlation Coefficient | 0.329** | 0.450** | 0.267** | 0.966** | 1 | |||||||||
p-value (two tailed) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |||||||||||
AZM | Pearson Correlation Coefficient | 0.126 | 0.190** | 0.102 | 0.371** | 0.384** | 1 | ||||||||
p-value (two tailed | 0.062 | 0.005 | 0.131 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||||||||||
EM | Pearson Correlation Coefficient | 0.234** | 0.473** | 0.190** | 0.687** | 0.711** | 0.540** | 1 | |||||||
p-value (two tailed | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.005 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |||||||||
TET | Pearson Correlation Coefficient | 0.196** | 0.379** | 0.159* | 0.576** | 0.597** | 0.644** | 0.840** | 1 | ||||||
p-value (two tailed | 0.004 | < 0.001 | 0.019 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
GEN | Pearson Correlation Coefficient | -c | -c | -c | -c | -c | -c | -c | -c | -c | |||||
p-value (two tailed | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
CM | Pearson Correlation Coefficient | 0.126 | 0.190** | 0.102 | 0.371** | 0.384** | 1.000** | 0.540** | 0.644** | -c | 1 | ||||
p-value (two tailed | 0.062 | 0.005 | 0.131 | < .001 | < .001 | 0.000 | < .001 | < .001 | -c | ||||||
NIT | Pearson Correlation Coefficient | 0.232** | 0.468** | 0.188** | 0.680** | 0.704** | 0.545** | 0.991** | 0.847** | -c | 0.545** | 1 | |||
p-value (two tailed | < .001 | < .001 | 0.005 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | -c | < .001 | |||||
CIP | Pearson Correlation Coefficient | 0.161* | 0.288** | 0.131 | 0.473** | 0.490** | 0.784** | 0.689** | 0.820** | -c | 0.784** | 0.695** | 1 | ||
p-value (two tailed | 0.017 | < .001 | 0.054 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | -c | < .001 | < .001 | ||||
LEV | Pearson Correlation Coefficient | 0.143* | 0.237** | 0.166 | 0.419** | 0.434** | 0.886** | 0.610** | 0.727** | -c | 0.886** | 0.616** | 0.886** | 1 | |
p-value (two tailed | 0.035 | < .001 | 0.088 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | -c | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | |||
CMX | Pearson Correlation Coefficient | 0.431** | 0.343** | 0.350** | 0.790** | 0.763** | 0.293** | 0.543** | 0.455** | -c | 0.293** | 0.538** | 0.374** | 0.331** | 1 |
p-value (two tailed | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | -c | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | < .001 | - |
*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed), ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2 tailed), CCannot be computed because at least one of the variables is constant, PG Penicillin G, AMC Amoxicillin-Clavulanic acid, CFM Cefixime, CTR Ceftriaxone, VAN Vancomycin, AZM Azithromycin, EM Erythromycin, TET Tetracycline, GEN Gentamicin, CM Clindamycin, NIT Nitrofurantoin, CIP Ciprofloxacin, LEV Levofloxacin, CMX Co-Trimoxazole