Skip to main content
. 2005 May;49(5):1915–1926. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.5.1915-1926.2005

TABLE 2.

Validation of microarray-based expression profiles by real-time RT-PCR

Gene Product/function Antibiotica Condition (MIC, time [min]) Relative expression levelb at:
Validationc
Microarray Real-time PCR
rplF Ribosomal protein L6 Cm 0.25×, 15 3.8 7.3 Yes
Em 0.25×, 15 1.5 3.9 Yes
Em 0.25×, 60 0.6 0.7 Yes
Gm 0.25×, 5 2.2 4.3 Yes
Gm 0.25×, 60 0.5 0.3 Yes
rbsB Ribose ABC transporters; ribose-binding protein Cm 0.25×, 15 3.8 4.4 Yes
Em 0.25×, 15 0.5 0.3 Yes
Em 0.25×, 60 1.7 1.6 Yes
Gm 0.25×, 15 0.4 0.4 Yes
groES Class I heat shock protein Cm 0.25×, 15 0.3 0.3 Yes
Cm 0.25×, 60 0.3 0.4 Yes
Em 0.25×, 15 0.5 0.3 Yes
Em 0.25×, 60 1.6 0.1 No
Gm 0.25×, 60 3.9 9.8 Yes
clpP Class III heat shock protein Cm 0.25×, 15 0.6 0.6 Yes
Gm 0.1×, 60 2.0 2.3 Yes
Gm 0.25×, 60 3.8 4.0 Yes
Gm 0.4×, 60 4.3 4.7 Yes
cspB Cold shock protein Cm 0.4×, 60 3.4 6.5 Yes
cspD Cold shock protein Em 0.25×, 15 2.9 4.4 Yes
a

Cm, chloramphenicol; Em, erythromycin; Gm, gentamicin.

b

Values shown are the relative transcript levels of treated sample over untreated sample. The same RNA samples were used for both microarray and RT-PCR experiments. Values more than one indicate induction and values less than one indicate repression in the antibiotic-treated samples.

c

“Yes” indicates validation of microarray data of up- or downregulation.