Table 2. Evaluation of methodological quality using Bogardus method.
Study | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aydemir et al.21 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
Härtel et al.9 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
Abu-Maziad et al.22 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | no |
Auriti et al.23 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
Koroglu et al.24 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
Spiegler et al.25 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
Abdel-Hady et al.26 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
Bertalan et al.27 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | no |
Reiman et al.28 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
Dzwonek et al.29 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
van Der Zwet et al.30 | no | yes | yes | no | no | no | yes |
Schueller et al.31 | no | yes | yes | yes | no | yes | yes |
Derzbach et al.32 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | no |
Härtel et al.33 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
Baier et al.34 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Göpel et al.35 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
John Baier et al.36 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | no |
Hedberg et al.37 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | no |
Ahrens et al.38 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
Bessler et al.39 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
Harding et al.40 | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
Treszl et al.41 | no | yes | yes | yes | yes | no | yes |
1 = reproducibility; 2 = definition of cases; 3 = adequacy of cases; 4 = definition of control; 5 = adequacy of control; 6 = objectivity; 7 = quantification of results.