Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 19;4:21. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00446-6

Table 5.

Generalisation of density prediction performance across imaging techniques

Training set 4-Class Accuracy (95% CI)
FFDM test set 2DS test set
FFDM-only 80.5% (79.7–81.4) 79.4% (78.5–80.2)
FFDM/2DS 82.3% (81.4–83.0) 82.3% (81.3–83.1)

First row shows performance for a model trained on FFDM studies only. Second row is a model trained on FFDM and 2DS.

FFDM full-field digital mammography, 2DS two-dimensional synthetic.