Table 2.
Interrater reliability of Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) ratings
| Quadratic-weighted kappa | 95% CI | n | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||
| Between ordinal CFS (1–9) | ||||
| TC – ST | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 850 |
| TC – geriED-TN | 0.75 | 0.66 | 0.82 | 105 |
| ST – geriED-TN | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.81 | 125 |
| Between frailty categories (CFS 1–4 = non-frail to vulnerable, CFS 5–6 = mild to moderate frailty, CFS 7–9 = severe frailty to terminally ill) | ||||
| TC – ST | 0.70 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 850 |
| TC – geriED-TN | 0.70 | 0.59 | 0.79 | 105 |
| ST – geriED-TN | 0.67 | 0.55 | 0.77 | 125 |
Interrater reliability of Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) ratings between the TC, the ST and the geriED-TN. The IRR is calculated for ordinal CFS ratings and categorized CFS ratings (CFS 1–4 = non-frail to vulnerable, CFS 5–6 = mild to moderate frailty, CFS 7–9 = severe frailty to terminally ill). Data are reported as kappa values and 95% CI. 95% CI were calculated using a bootstrap method.
CFS clinical frailty scale, ST study team, TC triage clinicians, geriED-TN geriatric Emergency Department trained nurses